{"title":"运动干预对自闭症谱系障碍儿童平衡和执行功能的影响:一项meta分析。","authors":"Haixia Li, Ruiyun Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13102-025-01142-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study primarily evaluated the the effects of exercise intervention on balance and executive function in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search for eligible studies through four databases, and then proceed with screening. The inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) Children with ASD; (2) Age 3-18 years; (3) Randomised Controlled Trial; (4) The intervention group received exercise training; (5) Conducted pre- and post-test, which include balance and executive function. Use the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool to evaluate the quality of the selected study. Select Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) as the appropriate effect scale index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve of the selected articles involved 288 males and 108 females. The findings demonstrated that the exercise group (EG) benefited more from the improved balance than its control group (CG) counterpart [SMD = 0.86 (0.56, 1.16), p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 37%]. Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed that exercise interventions lasting over eight weeks significantly enhanced balance [SMD = 1.19 (0.79, 1.58), p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 17%]. However, exercise interventions lasting less than or equal to 8 weeks did not have a significant impact on balance [SMD = 0.41 (- 0.06, 0.87), p = 0.09, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise interventions can better improve the balance and behavioural inhibition of children with ASD compared to CG. Nevertheless, physical training prescribed for more than eight weeks led to a more significant improvement in balance than interventions performed for shorter periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"17 1","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11987222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of exercise intervention on balance and executive function in children with autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Haixia Li, Ruiyun Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13102-025-01142-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study primarily evaluated the the effects of exercise intervention on balance and executive function in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search for eligible studies through four databases, and then proceed with screening. The inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) Children with ASD; (2) Age 3-18 years; (3) Randomised Controlled Trial; (4) The intervention group received exercise training; (5) Conducted pre- and post-test, which include balance and executive function. Use the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool to evaluate the quality of the selected study. Select Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) as the appropriate effect scale index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve of the selected articles involved 288 males and 108 females. The findings demonstrated that the exercise group (EG) benefited more from the improved balance than its control group (CG) counterpart [SMD = 0.86 (0.56, 1.16), p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 37%]. Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed that exercise interventions lasting over eight weeks significantly enhanced balance [SMD = 1.19 (0.79, 1.58), p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 17%]. However, exercise interventions lasting less than or equal to 8 weeks did not have a significant impact on balance [SMD = 0.41 (- 0.06, 0.87), p = 0.09, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise interventions can better improve the balance and behavioural inhibition of children with ASD compared to CG. Nevertheless, physical training prescribed for more than eight weeks led to a more significant improvement in balance than interventions performed for shorter periods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11987222/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01142-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01142-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究主要评价运动干预对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童平衡和执行功能的影响。方法:通过四个数据库检索符合条件的研究,然后进行筛选。纳入标准如下:(1)ASD患儿;(2)年龄3-18周岁;(3)随机对照试验;(4)干预组进行运动训练;(5)进行前后测试,包括平衡和执行功能。使用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具评价所选研究的质量。选择标准平均差(SMD)作为合适的效应标度指标。结果:入选文献12篇,男性288篇,女性108篇。研究结果表明,运动组(EG)比对照组(CG)从平衡改善中获益更多[SMD = 0.86 (0.56, 1.16), p 2 = 37%]。此外,亚组分析显示,持续超过8周的运动干预显著提高了平衡性[SMD = 1.19 (0.79, 1.58), p 2 = 17%]。然而,少于或等于8周的运动干预对平衡没有显著影响[SMD = 0.41 (- 0.06, 0.87), p = 0.09, I2 = 0%]。结论:与CG相比,运动干预能更好地改善ASD患儿的平衡能力和行为抑制能力。然而,八周以上的体育锻炼比短时间的干预更能显著改善平衡感。
The effect of exercise intervention on balance and executive function in children with autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis.
Objective: This study primarily evaluated the the effects of exercise intervention on balance and executive function in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Methods: Search for eligible studies through four databases, and then proceed with screening. The inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) Children with ASD; (2) Age 3-18 years; (3) Randomised Controlled Trial; (4) The intervention group received exercise training; (5) Conducted pre- and post-test, which include balance and executive function. Use the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool to evaluate the quality of the selected study. Select Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) as the appropriate effect scale index.
Results: Twelve of the selected articles involved 288 males and 108 females. The findings demonstrated that the exercise group (EG) benefited more from the improved balance than its control group (CG) counterpart [SMD = 0.86 (0.56, 1.16), p < 0.05, I2 = 37%]. Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed that exercise interventions lasting over eight weeks significantly enhanced balance [SMD = 1.19 (0.79, 1.58), p < 0.05, I2 = 17%]. However, exercise interventions lasting less than or equal to 8 weeks did not have a significant impact on balance [SMD = 0.41 (- 0.06, 0.87), p = 0.09, I2 = 0%].
Conclusion: Exercise interventions can better improve the balance and behavioural inhibition of children with ASD compared to CG. Nevertheless, physical training prescribed for more than eight weeks led to a more significant improvement in balance than interventions performed for shorter periods.
期刊介绍:
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.