基线时较低的语义语言流畅性表明未来主观认知能力下降。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frédérique Roy-Côté, Isabelle Rouleau, Émilie Delage, Marc-Antoine Akzam-Ouellette, Sven Joubert
{"title":"基线时较低的语义语言流畅性表明未来主观认知能力下降。","authors":"Frédérique Roy-Côté, Isabelle Rouleau, Émilie Delage, Marc-Antoine Akzam-Ouellette, Sven Joubert","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2497923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) refers to a condition in which older adults are concerned that they are experiencing a decline in cognitive function. The risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) is significantly higher in older adults with SCD, as a proportion of them will go on to develop the disease over the years. Despite overall normal function on cognitive tests, evidence suggests that some SCD individuals may have circumscribed deficits in specific cognitive domains or tests. This study aimed to investigate semantic function in SCD, specifically by comparing the performance of SCD progressors (SCDp) - who fulfilled MCI criteria at follow-up, and SCD non-progressors (SCDnp) - who either remained stable or reverted to normal cognition. The main hypothesis was that the SCDp group would show significantly lower semantic performance than the SCDnp group at baseline. We also expected the SCDp group to decline faster on semantic tests at the two-year follow-up assessment than SCDnp. Data from the CIMA-Q cohort were analyzed. The SCDp and SCDnp groups were formed by precisely matching 25 participants from each group based on age and education levels. Both groups were compared in terms of neuropsychological performance at baseline and follow-up. Independent samples t-tests or ANCOVAs were used to measure baseline performance in the semantic domain and other cognitive domains. To study longitudinal changes in cognitive performance at follow-up, two-factor ANOVAs were performed. At baseline, SCDp participants performed significantly worse than SCDnp participants on the Category (semantic) fluency test, although this difference was not maintained at follow-up. No difference was found in other cognitive domains at baseline. Longitudinal analyses showed that a significant decline in MoCA score was observed in the SCDp group only. The results of this study suggest that reduced verbal semantic fluency in older people with SCD may indicate a higher risk of future cognitive decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower semantic verbal fluency at baseline indicates future decline in subjective cognitive decline.\",\"authors\":\"Frédérique Roy-Côté, Isabelle Rouleau, Émilie Delage, Marc-Antoine Akzam-Ouellette, Sven Joubert\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2025.2497923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) refers to a condition in which older adults are concerned that they are experiencing a decline in cognitive function. The risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) is significantly higher in older adults with SCD, as a proportion of them will go on to develop the disease over the years. Despite overall normal function on cognitive tests, evidence suggests that some SCD individuals may have circumscribed deficits in specific cognitive domains or tests. This study aimed to investigate semantic function in SCD, specifically by comparing the performance of SCD progressors (SCDp) - who fulfilled MCI criteria at follow-up, and SCD non-progressors (SCDnp) - who either remained stable or reverted to normal cognition. The main hypothesis was that the SCDp group would show significantly lower semantic performance than the SCDnp group at baseline. We also expected the SCDp group to decline faster on semantic tests at the two-year follow-up assessment than SCDnp. Data from the CIMA-Q cohort were analyzed. The SCDp and SCDnp groups were formed by precisely matching 25 participants from each group based on age and education levels. Both groups were compared in terms of neuropsychological performance at baseline and follow-up. Independent samples t-tests or ANCOVAs were used to measure baseline performance in the semantic domain and other cognitive domains. To study longitudinal changes in cognitive performance at follow-up, two-factor ANOVAs were performed. At baseline, SCDp participants performed significantly worse than SCDnp participants on the Category (semantic) fluency test, although this difference was not maintained at follow-up. No difference was found in other cognitive domains at baseline. Longitudinal analyses showed that a significant decline in MoCA score was observed in the SCDp group only. The results of this study suggest that reduced verbal semantic fluency in older people with SCD may indicate a higher risk of future cognitive decline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2497923\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2497923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主观认知能力下降(SCD)是指老年人担心他们正在经历认知功能下降的一种状况。患有SCD的老年人患阿尔茨海默病(AD)的风险明显更高,因为他们中的一部分人会在多年后继续患上这种疾病。尽管认知测试的整体功能正常,但有证据表明,一些SCD患者可能在特定的认知领域或测试中存在有限的缺陷。本研究旨在研究SCD的语义功能,特别是通过比较随访时达到MCI标准的SCD进展者(SCDp)和保持稳定或恢复正常认知的SCD非进展者(SCDnp)的表现。主要假设是SCDp组在基线时的语义表现明显低于SCDnp组。我们还预计,在两年的随访评估中,SCDp组在语义测试上的下降速度比SCDnp组快。分析来自CIMA-Q队列的数据。SCDp组和SCDnp组是根据年龄和教育水平从每组精确匹配25名参与者形成的。两组在基线和随访时的神经心理表现进行比较。使用独立样本t检验或ancova来测量语义域和其他认知域的基线表现。为了研究随访时认知表现的纵向变化,采用双因素方差分析。在基线时,SCDp参与者在类别(语义)流畅性测试中的表现明显差于SCDnp参与者,尽管这种差异在随访中没有保持。在基线时,其他认知领域没有发现差异。纵向分析显示,仅在SCDp组观察到MoCA评分显著下降。这项研究的结果表明,老年SCD患者的语言语义流畅性降低可能表明未来认知能力下降的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lower semantic verbal fluency at baseline indicates future decline in subjective cognitive decline.

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) refers to a condition in which older adults are concerned that they are experiencing a decline in cognitive function. The risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) is significantly higher in older adults with SCD, as a proportion of them will go on to develop the disease over the years. Despite overall normal function on cognitive tests, evidence suggests that some SCD individuals may have circumscribed deficits in specific cognitive domains or tests. This study aimed to investigate semantic function in SCD, specifically by comparing the performance of SCD progressors (SCDp) - who fulfilled MCI criteria at follow-up, and SCD non-progressors (SCDnp) - who either remained stable or reverted to normal cognition. The main hypothesis was that the SCDp group would show significantly lower semantic performance than the SCDnp group at baseline. We also expected the SCDp group to decline faster on semantic tests at the two-year follow-up assessment than SCDnp. Data from the CIMA-Q cohort were analyzed. The SCDp and SCDnp groups were formed by precisely matching 25 participants from each group based on age and education levels. Both groups were compared in terms of neuropsychological performance at baseline and follow-up. Independent samples t-tests or ANCOVAs were used to measure baseline performance in the semantic domain and other cognitive domains. To study longitudinal changes in cognitive performance at follow-up, two-factor ANOVAs were performed. At baseline, SCDp participants performed significantly worse than SCDnp participants on the Category (semantic) fluency test, although this difference was not maintained at follow-up. No difference was found in other cognitive domains at baseline. Longitudinal analyses showed that a significant decline in MoCA score was observed in the SCDp group only. The results of this study suggest that reduced verbal semantic fluency in older people with SCD may indicate a higher risk of future cognitive decline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信