择期成人心脏手术后持续心包冲洗可降低术后出血风险——一项研究水平的荟萃分析

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Shubham N Jain, Hiral S Jhala, Mohsin Uzzaman, Keith G Buchan
{"title":"择期成人心脏手术后持续心包冲洗可降低术后出血风险——一项研究水平的荟萃分析","authors":"Shubham N Jain, Hiral S Jhala, Mohsin Uzzaman, Keith G Buchan","doi":"10.1186/s13019-025-03428-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retained blood syndrome contributes to higher morbidity and mortality post cardiac surgery. We investigate the benefits of continuous postoperative pericardial flushing (CPPF) over standard care chest drainage in elective adult cardiac surgery patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Various online databases were screened for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observations studies comparing CPPF to standard care.</p><p><strong>Primary outcomes: </strong>12-hour and total blood loss, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp (ACC) times; surgical re-intervention for bleeding, mortality, sternal wound infections and pericardial or pleural fluid re-accumulation at discharge.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>perioperative blood transfusion, time to extubation and total hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>586 patients from four studies with matched characteristics were included. CPPF was associated with less blood loss at 12 h and in total: Odds Ratio (OR) (95% CI) 0.71 (-0.91 to 0.51) and 0.49 (-0.67 to -0.32) (both p < 0.00001). CPPF had lower need for transfusion of blood products RR 0.57 (0.36-0.89) (p = 0.01)). There were no significant differences in surgical re-intervention rates, overall mortality, CPB, ACC times, length of hospital stay, time until extubation or sternal wound infections. Risk of pericardial or pleural fluid re-accumulation was lower in the CPPF groups RR 0.88 (0.80-0.97) (p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CPPF has shown promising results in reducing postoperative blood loss and fluid re-accumulation with fewer blood transfusions, and lower surgical re-intervention rates across all ranges of cardiac surgical procedures. It is safe, feasible and effective in all types of cardiac surgery, however further studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"195"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous postoperative pericardial flushing to reduce the risk of postoperative bleeding after elective adult cardiac surgery - a study-level meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shubham N Jain, Hiral S Jhala, Mohsin Uzzaman, Keith G Buchan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13019-025-03428-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retained blood syndrome contributes to higher morbidity and mortality post cardiac surgery. We investigate the benefits of continuous postoperative pericardial flushing (CPPF) over standard care chest drainage in elective adult cardiac surgery patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Various online databases were screened for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observations studies comparing CPPF to standard care.</p><p><strong>Primary outcomes: </strong>12-hour and total blood loss, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp (ACC) times; surgical re-intervention for bleeding, mortality, sternal wound infections and pericardial or pleural fluid re-accumulation at discharge.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>perioperative blood transfusion, time to extubation and total hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>586 patients from four studies with matched characteristics were included. CPPF was associated with less blood loss at 12 h and in total: Odds Ratio (OR) (95% CI) 0.71 (-0.91 to 0.51) and 0.49 (-0.67 to -0.32) (both p < 0.00001). CPPF had lower need for transfusion of blood products RR 0.57 (0.36-0.89) (p = 0.01)). There were no significant differences in surgical re-intervention rates, overall mortality, CPB, ACC times, length of hospital stay, time until extubation or sternal wound infections. Risk of pericardial or pleural fluid re-accumulation was lower in the CPPF groups RR 0.88 (0.80-0.97) (p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CPPF has shown promising results in reducing postoperative blood loss and fluid re-accumulation with fewer blood transfusions, and lower surgical re-intervention rates across all ranges of cardiac surgical procedures. It is safe, feasible and effective in all types of cardiac surgery, however further studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993965/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03428-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03428-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:保留血综合征是心脏手术后较高的发病率和死亡率的原因之一。我们研究了选择性成人心脏手术患者术后持续心包冲洗(CPPF)比标准护理胸腔引流的益处。方法:筛选各种在线数据库,比较CPPF与标准治疗的随机对照试验(rct)和观察性研究。主要结局:12小时和总失血量、体外循环(CPB)和主动脉交叉钳夹(ACC)次数;对出血、死亡、胸骨伤口感染和出院时心包或胸膜积液再进行手术干预。次要结局:围手术期输血、拔管时间和总住院时间。结果:来自4项研究的586例患者具有匹配的特征。CPPF与12小时和总出血量减少相关:优势比(OR) (95% CI) 0.71(-0.91至0.51)和0.49(-0.67至-0.32)(均为p)结论:CPPF在减少输血和降低手术再干预率的情况下,在减少术后出血量和液体再积聚方面显示出有希望的结果。它在所有类型的心脏手术中都是安全、可行和有效的,但需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuous postoperative pericardial flushing to reduce the risk of postoperative bleeding after elective adult cardiac surgery - a study-level meta-analysis.

Background: Retained blood syndrome contributes to higher morbidity and mortality post cardiac surgery. We investigate the benefits of continuous postoperative pericardial flushing (CPPF) over standard care chest drainage in elective adult cardiac surgery patients.

Methods: Various online databases were screened for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observations studies comparing CPPF to standard care.

Primary outcomes: 12-hour and total blood loss, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp (ACC) times; surgical re-intervention for bleeding, mortality, sternal wound infections and pericardial or pleural fluid re-accumulation at discharge.

Secondary outcomes: perioperative blood transfusion, time to extubation and total hospital stay.

Results: 586 patients from four studies with matched characteristics were included. CPPF was associated with less blood loss at 12 h and in total: Odds Ratio (OR) (95% CI) 0.71 (-0.91 to 0.51) and 0.49 (-0.67 to -0.32) (both p < 0.00001). CPPF had lower need for transfusion of blood products RR 0.57 (0.36-0.89) (p = 0.01)). There were no significant differences in surgical re-intervention rates, overall mortality, CPB, ACC times, length of hospital stay, time until extubation or sternal wound infections. Risk of pericardial or pleural fluid re-accumulation was lower in the CPPF groups RR 0.88 (0.80-0.97) (p = 0.01).

Conclusions: CPPF has shown promising results in reducing postoperative blood loss and fluid re-accumulation with fewer blood transfusions, and lower surgical re-intervention rates across all ranges of cardiac surgical procedures. It is safe, feasible and effective in all types of cardiac surgery, however further studies are needed to validate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信