视频直接观察治疗改善儿童持续性哮喘患者吸入器技术。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Journal of Asthma Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-05 DOI:10.1080/02770903.2025.2499829
Lina Mahmood, Kasturi R Sarkar, Kaymon Neal, Rita C Brown, Andrew W Brown, Scott Stewart, Robert D Pesek, Akilah A Jefferson, Tamara T Perry
{"title":"视频直接观察治疗改善儿童持续性哮喘患者吸入器技术。","authors":"Lina Mahmood, Kasturi R Sarkar, Kaymon Neal, Rita C Brown, Andrew W Brown, Scott Stewart, Robert D Pesek, Akilah A Jefferson, Tamara T Perry","doi":"10.1080/02770903.2025.2499829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility of at-home video directly observed therapy (vDOT) among pediatric patients with asthma to learn and retain proper inhaler technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized pilot study with 22 children with persistent asthma aged 6-11 years who were newly prescribed an asthma controller inhaler. Patients underwent 1:1 randomization into one group receiving standard inhaler education during clinic and another receiving standard education plus vDOT for 30 days. vDOT is a method by which trained professionals observe patients self-administering medications through a virtual platform to monitor adherence and proper medication use. We measured inhaler technique, age-appropriate Asthma Control Test (ACT) score, symptom-free days, and healthcare utilization in both groups at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median inhaler technique accuracy percentage score was 88% (IQR 66, 100) for vDOT participants compared to 75% (IQR 38, 88) for controls (<i>p</i> = 0.11). Technique errors within the vDOT group included inadequate breath-holding (34%), inadequate breathing technique (29%), incorrect/no shaking of inhaler (22%) and failure to rinse mouth (15%). There was no difference between groups in change in ACT score, resource utilization or controller prescription refill rates. In the first 30 days, the median number of days until vDOT participants had no observed technique errors was 10 days (range 0-25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>vDOT is a viable technique to provide initial and continual education and real-time feedback on inhaler technique after the initial education provided in clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":15076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma","volume":" ","pages":"1591-1598"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12353540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Video directly observed therapy to improve inhaler technique among pediatric patients with persistent asthma.\",\"authors\":\"Lina Mahmood, Kasturi R Sarkar, Kaymon Neal, Rita C Brown, Andrew W Brown, Scott Stewart, Robert D Pesek, Akilah A Jefferson, Tamara T Perry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02770903.2025.2499829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility of at-home video directly observed therapy (vDOT) among pediatric patients with asthma to learn and retain proper inhaler technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized pilot study with 22 children with persistent asthma aged 6-11 years who were newly prescribed an asthma controller inhaler. Patients underwent 1:1 randomization into one group receiving standard inhaler education during clinic and another receiving standard education plus vDOT for 30 days. vDOT is a method by which trained professionals observe patients self-administering medications through a virtual platform to monitor adherence and proper medication use. We measured inhaler technique, age-appropriate Asthma Control Test (ACT) score, symptom-free days, and healthcare utilization in both groups at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median inhaler technique accuracy percentage score was 88% (IQR 66, 100) for vDOT participants compared to 75% (IQR 38, 88) for controls (<i>p</i> = 0.11). Technique errors within the vDOT group included inadequate breath-holding (34%), inadequate breathing technique (29%), incorrect/no shaking of inhaler (22%) and failure to rinse mouth (15%). There was no difference between groups in change in ACT score, resource utilization or controller prescription refill rates. In the first 30 days, the median number of days until vDOT participants had no observed technique errors was 10 days (range 0-25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>vDOT is a viable technique to provide initial and continual education and real-time feedback on inhaler technique after the initial education provided in clinic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asthma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1591-1598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12353540/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asthma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2025.2499829\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2025.2499829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨家用视频直接观察疗法(vDOT)对儿童哮喘患者学习和保留正确吸入器技术的可行性。方法:我们对22名6-11岁的持续性哮喘儿童进行了随机试验,这些儿童新开了哮喘控制吸入器。患者按1:1随机分组,一组在临床期间接受标准吸入器教育,另一组接受标准教育加vDOT治疗30天。vDOT是一种训练有素的专业人员通过虚拟平台观察患者自我管理药物的方法,以监测依从性和正确的药物使用。我们测量了吸入器技术、与年龄相适应的哮喘控制测试(ACT)评分、无症状天数和3个月时两组的医疗保健利用率。结果:vDOT参与者吸入器技术准确度百分比得分中位数为88% (IQR 66,100),而对照组为75% (IQR 38,88) (p = 0.11)。vDOT组的技术错误包括屏气不充分(34%),呼吸技术不充分(29%),吸入器不正确/没有摇晃(22%)和未能漱口(15%)。两组间在ACT评分、资源利用或对照者处方补充率的变化方面没有差异。在前30天,直到vDOT参与者没有观察到的技术错误的中位数天数是10天(范围0-25)。结论:vDOT技术是一种可行的方法,可以对吸入器技术进行初步和持续的教育,并在临床进行初步教育后进行实时反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Video directly observed therapy to improve inhaler technique among pediatric patients with persistent asthma.

Objective: To assess the feasibility of at-home video directly observed therapy (vDOT) among pediatric patients with asthma to learn and retain proper inhaler technique.

Methods: We conducted a randomized pilot study with 22 children with persistent asthma aged 6-11 years who were newly prescribed an asthma controller inhaler. Patients underwent 1:1 randomization into one group receiving standard inhaler education during clinic and another receiving standard education plus vDOT for 30 days. vDOT is a method by which trained professionals observe patients self-administering medications through a virtual platform to monitor adherence and proper medication use. We measured inhaler technique, age-appropriate Asthma Control Test (ACT) score, symptom-free days, and healthcare utilization in both groups at 3 months.

Results: Median inhaler technique accuracy percentage score was 88% (IQR 66, 100) for vDOT participants compared to 75% (IQR 38, 88) for controls (p = 0.11). Technique errors within the vDOT group included inadequate breath-holding (34%), inadequate breathing technique (29%), incorrect/no shaking of inhaler (22%) and failure to rinse mouth (15%). There was no difference between groups in change in ACT score, resource utilization or controller prescription refill rates. In the first 30 days, the median number of days until vDOT participants had no observed technique errors was 10 days (range 0-25).

Conclusion: vDOT is a viable technique to provide initial and continual education and real-time feedback on inhaler technique after the initial education provided in clinic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma
Journal of Asthma 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Providing an authoritative open forum on asthma and related conditions, Journal of Asthma publishes clinical research around such topics as asthma management, critical and long-term care, preventative measures, environmental counselling, and patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信