Georgia Livieri, Eleni Mangina, Evangelos D Protopapadakis, Andrie G Panayiotou
{"title":"患者认为的数字卫生技术使用的差距和挑战:范围审查和叙事综合。","authors":"Georgia Livieri, Eleni Mangina, Evangelos D Protopapadakis, Andrie G Panayiotou","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1474956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital health has revolutionized the landscape of healthcare through personalized care, moving away from the traditional approach of treating symptoms and conditions. Digital devices provide diagnostic accuracy and treatment effectiveness while equipping patients with control over their health and well-being. Although the growth of technology provides unprecedented opportunities, there are also certain issues arising from the use of such technology. This scoping review aimed to explore perceived gaps and challenges in the use of digital technology by patients and meta-synthesize them. Identifying such gaps and challenges will encourage new insights and understanding, leading to evidence-informed policies and practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three electronic databases were searched (Cinahl EBSCO, Pubmed, and Web of Science) for papers published in English between January 2010 and December 2023. A narrative meta-synthesis was performed. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2009 checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 345 papers were retrieved and screened, with a noticeable increase in publication numbers after 2015. After the final selection, a total of 28 papers were included in the final meta-synthesis; these were published between 2015 and 2023. A total of 99 individual reports were included in the synthesis of these papers, comprising 25 identified gaps and 74 challenges.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our meta-synthesis revealed several gaps and challenges related to patients' use of digital technology in health, including generational differences in digital propensity and deficiencies in the work process. In terms of ethics, the lack of trust in technology and data ownership was highlighted, with the meta-synthesis identifying issues in the realm of disruption of human rights. We, therefore, propose building a model for ethically aligned technology development and acceptance that considers human rights a crucial parameter in the digital healthcare ecosystem.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1474956"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The gaps and challenges in digital health technology use as perceived by patients: a scoping review and narrative meta-synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Georgia Livieri, Eleni Mangina, Evangelos D Protopapadakis, Andrie G Panayiotou\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1474956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital health has revolutionized the landscape of healthcare through personalized care, moving away from the traditional approach of treating symptoms and conditions. Digital devices provide diagnostic accuracy and treatment effectiveness while equipping patients with control over their health and well-being. Although the growth of technology provides unprecedented opportunities, there are also certain issues arising from the use of such technology. This scoping review aimed to explore perceived gaps and challenges in the use of digital technology by patients and meta-synthesize them. Identifying such gaps and challenges will encourage new insights and understanding, leading to evidence-informed policies and practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three electronic databases were searched (Cinahl EBSCO, Pubmed, and Web of Science) for papers published in English between January 2010 and December 2023. A narrative meta-synthesis was performed. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2009 checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 345 papers were retrieved and screened, with a noticeable increase in publication numbers after 2015. After the final selection, a total of 28 papers were included in the final meta-synthesis; these were published between 2015 and 2023. A total of 99 individual reports were included in the synthesis of these papers, comprising 25 identified gaps and 74 challenges.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our meta-synthesis revealed several gaps and challenges related to patients' use of digital technology in health, including generational differences in digital propensity and deficiencies in the work process. In terms of ethics, the lack of trust in technology and data ownership was highlighted, with the meta-synthesis identifying issues in the realm of disruption of human rights. We, therefore, propose building a model for ethically aligned technology development and acceptance that considers human rights a crucial parameter in the digital healthcare ecosystem.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1474956\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983460/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1474956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1474956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导语:数字健康通过个性化护理彻底改变了医疗保健的面貌,摆脱了传统的治疗症状和疾病的方法。数字设备提供诊断准确性和治疗有效性,同时使患者能够控制自己的健康和福祉。虽然技术的发展提供了前所未有的机会,但在使用这种技术的过程中也产生了一些问题。本综述旨在探讨患者在使用数字技术方面的差距和挑战,并对其进行meta综合。确定这些差距和挑战将鼓励新的见解和理解,从而导致循证政策和做法。方法:检索2010年1月至2023年12月期间发表的英文论文(Cinahl EBSCO、Pubmed和Web of Science)。进行叙事元综合。该评价遵循了2009年系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)首选报告项目清单。结果:共检索筛选论文345篇,2015年后发文量明显增加。经过最终的筛选,共有28篇论文被纳入最终的meta-synthesis;这些报告发表于2015年至2023年之间。这些文件的综合中共包括99份单独的报告,其中包括25个已查明的差距和74个挑战。讨论:我们的荟萃综合揭示了与患者在健康中使用数字技术相关的一些差距和挑战,包括数字倾向的代际差异和工作过程中的缺陷。在道德方面,会议强调了对技术和数据所有权缺乏信任的问题,综合报告确定了破坏人权领域的问题。因此,我们建议建立一个符合伦理的技术开发和接受模型,将人权视为数字医疗生态系统中的一个关键参数。
The gaps and challenges in digital health technology use as perceived by patients: a scoping review and narrative meta-synthesis.
Introduction: Digital health has revolutionized the landscape of healthcare through personalized care, moving away from the traditional approach of treating symptoms and conditions. Digital devices provide diagnostic accuracy and treatment effectiveness while equipping patients with control over their health and well-being. Although the growth of technology provides unprecedented opportunities, there are also certain issues arising from the use of such technology. This scoping review aimed to explore perceived gaps and challenges in the use of digital technology by patients and meta-synthesize them. Identifying such gaps and challenges will encourage new insights and understanding, leading to evidence-informed policies and practices.
Methods: Three electronic databases were searched (Cinahl EBSCO, Pubmed, and Web of Science) for papers published in English between January 2010 and December 2023. A narrative meta-synthesis was performed. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2009 checklist.
Results: A total of 345 papers were retrieved and screened, with a noticeable increase in publication numbers after 2015. After the final selection, a total of 28 papers were included in the final meta-synthesis; these were published between 2015 and 2023. A total of 99 individual reports were included in the synthesis of these papers, comprising 25 identified gaps and 74 challenges.
Discussion: Our meta-synthesis revealed several gaps and challenges related to patients' use of digital technology in health, including generational differences in digital propensity and deficiencies in the work process. In terms of ethics, the lack of trust in technology and data ownership was highlighted, with the meta-synthesis identifying issues in the realm of disruption of human rights. We, therefore, propose building a model for ethically aligned technology development and acceptance that considers human rights a crucial parameter in the digital healthcare ecosystem.