常规实验室检查和专家MTB/RIF在结核病诊断中的表现。

IF 1.1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Natalia Zaporojan, Ramona Hodișan, Andreea Atena Zaha, Claudiu Zaporojan, Dana Carmen Zaha
{"title":"常规实验室检查和专家MTB/RIF在结核病诊断中的表现。","authors":"Natalia Zaporojan, Ramona Hodișan, Andreea Atena Zaha, Claudiu Zaporojan, Dana Carmen Zaha","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2025.3394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) represents a continuous challenge due to the variability and complexity of the required clinical samples. Although molecular technologies have considerably improved diagnostic accuracy, their combined use with traditional methods like microscopy and bacterial culture remains a subject of debate. This study aims to compare the performance of microscopy, bacterial culture on Löwenstein-Jensen medium, and the molecular Xpert MTB/RIF test in diagnosing pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB. In this retrospective study, conducted over a period from January 2016 to January 2023, data were collected from pulmonary TB and extrapulmonary TB samples of patients hospitalized in the pneumonology departments of the Bihor County Emergency Hospital. The study included 1796 patients, of whom 85.2% had samples collected from the respiratory tract. The variability of sensitivity and specificity depending on the type of sample indicates the need for a differentiated approach in diagnosis. The results show that the Xpert MTB/RIF test detected a higher number of positive cases (16%) compared to microscopy (9%) and bacterial culture (15%). Statistical analysis revealed a high sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF, suggesting superior accuracy compared to traditional methods. Our conclusions underline the importance of the Xpert MTB/RIF as a valuable tool in the diagnosis of TB, but it is recommended to use it in combination with other methods to ensure a complete and efficient diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of conventional laboratory tests and Xpert MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Zaporojan, Ramona Hodișan, Andreea Atena Zaha, Claudiu Zaporojan, Dana Carmen Zaha\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/monaldi.2025.3394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) represents a continuous challenge due to the variability and complexity of the required clinical samples. Although molecular technologies have considerably improved diagnostic accuracy, their combined use with traditional methods like microscopy and bacterial culture remains a subject of debate. This study aims to compare the performance of microscopy, bacterial culture on Löwenstein-Jensen medium, and the molecular Xpert MTB/RIF test in diagnosing pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB. In this retrospective study, conducted over a period from January 2016 to January 2023, data were collected from pulmonary TB and extrapulmonary TB samples of patients hospitalized in the pneumonology departments of the Bihor County Emergency Hospital. The study included 1796 patients, of whom 85.2% had samples collected from the respiratory tract. The variability of sensitivity and specificity depending on the type of sample indicates the need for a differentiated approach in diagnosis. The results show that the Xpert MTB/RIF test detected a higher number of positive cases (16%) compared to microscopy (9%) and bacterial culture (15%). Statistical analysis revealed a high sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF, suggesting superior accuracy compared to traditional methods. Our conclusions underline the importance of the Xpert MTB/RIF as a valuable tool in the diagnosis of TB, but it is recommended to use it in combination with other methods to ensure a complete and efficient diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于所需临床样本的多变性和复杂性,结核病的实验室诊断是一项持续的挑战。尽管分子技术大大提高了诊断的准确性,但它们与显微镜和细菌培养等传统方法的结合使用仍然是一个有争议的话题。本研究旨在比较显微镜、Löwenstein-Jensen培养基细菌培养和Xpert MTB/RIF分子检测在诊断肺结核和肺外结核中的作用。在2016年1月至2023年1月期间进行的这项回顾性研究中,收集了比霍尔县急诊医院肺病科住院患者的肺结核和肺外结核样本的数据。该研究包括1796例患者,其中85.2%的患者采集了呼吸道样本。敏感性和特异性的变化取决于样本的类型,这表明需要在诊断中采取区分的方法。结果表明,与显微镜(9%)和细菌培养(15%)相比,Xpert MTB/RIF试验检出的阳性病例数(16%)更高。统计分析显示,Xpert MTB/RIF具有较高的敏感性和特异性,与传统方法相比具有更高的准确性。我们的结论强调了Xpert MTB/RIF作为一种有价值的结核病诊断工具的重要性,但建议将其与其他方法结合使用,以确保完整和有效的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of conventional laboratory tests and Xpert MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

The laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) represents a continuous challenge due to the variability and complexity of the required clinical samples. Although molecular technologies have considerably improved diagnostic accuracy, their combined use with traditional methods like microscopy and bacterial culture remains a subject of debate. This study aims to compare the performance of microscopy, bacterial culture on Löwenstein-Jensen medium, and the molecular Xpert MTB/RIF test in diagnosing pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB. In this retrospective study, conducted over a period from January 2016 to January 2023, data were collected from pulmonary TB and extrapulmonary TB samples of patients hospitalized in the pneumonology departments of the Bihor County Emergency Hospital. The study included 1796 patients, of whom 85.2% had samples collected from the respiratory tract. The variability of sensitivity and specificity depending on the type of sample indicates the need for a differentiated approach in diagnosis. The results show that the Xpert MTB/RIF test detected a higher number of positive cases (16%) compared to microscopy (9%) and bacterial culture (15%). Statistical analysis revealed a high sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF, suggesting superior accuracy compared to traditional methods. Our conclusions underline the importance of the Xpert MTB/RIF as a valuable tool in the diagnosis of TB, but it is recommended to use it in combination with other methods to ensure a complete and efficient diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信