Jade D Rae, Angela Devine, Chanapat Patekkham, Aung Myint Thu, Gilles Delmas, Daniel M Parker, Richard J Maude, Jacher Wiladphaingern, Ladda Kajeechiwa, May Myo Thwin, Saw Win Tun, Julie A Simpson, François H Nosten
{"title":"大规模筛查和治疗干预措施对疟疾发病率和流行率的影响:缅甸东部消除疟疾规划的回顾性分析,以及系统评价和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jade D Rae, Angela Devine, Chanapat Patekkham, Aung Myint Thu, Gilles Delmas, Daniel M Parker, Richard J Maude, Jacher Wiladphaingern, Ladda Kajeechiwa, May Myo Thwin, Saw Win Tun, Julie A Simpson, François H Nosten","doi":"10.1186/s12936-025-05392-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Targeted interventions are often needed to accelerate malaria elimination efforts. Mass screening and treatment (MSAT) involves testing all eligible and consenting individuals in an area for malaria and treating all positive individuals simultaneously. However, there are concerns regarding the impact of MSAT. This study evaluates the impact of MSAT on malaria incidence in Karen State, Myanmar, using routine surveillance data, and investigates the impact of MSAT in other settings through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To investigate the impact of MSAT in Karen State, we retrospectively analysed routine malaria surveillance data collected in 10 villages where MSAT was done in 2018. Pre- and post-MSAT malaria incidences were compared, and a negative binomial mixed-effects model was used to estimate the relative change in monthly incidence for each additional year since MSAT. To investigate the impact of MSAT in other settings, we searched Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science (end date 11th July 2022) for studies assessing the impact of MSAT interventions on the incidence or prevalence of malaria infections. Studies were summarized, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed on studies grouped according to study design and the comparator used to assess the impact of MSAT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 10 villages in Karen State, there was an overall reduction in P. falciparum incidence following MSAT (Incidence Rate Ratio 0.37; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.73). However, this is likely due to the ongoing impact of early diagnosis and treatment services offered in these communities, as shown by an overall reduction in incidence in the surrounding area. Results from nine studies identified in the systematic review demonstrate the variable impact of MSAT, which is likely influenced by a variety of factors, including intervention coverage and uptake, baseline malaria endemicity, and methods used for MSAT delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective analysis and systemic review highlights the complexities behind the success of targeted interventions for malaria elimination. While these interventions are important drivers for achieving elimination goals, particularly in high-burden settings, it is important that various factors be considered when determining their suitability and how to optimize implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18317,"journal":{"name":"Malaria Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of mass screening and treatment interventions on malaria incidence and prevalence: a retrospective analysis of a malaria elimination programme in eastern Myanmar, and systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jade D Rae, Angela Devine, Chanapat Patekkham, Aung Myint Thu, Gilles Delmas, Daniel M Parker, Richard J Maude, Jacher Wiladphaingern, Ladda Kajeechiwa, May Myo Thwin, Saw Win Tun, Julie A Simpson, François H Nosten\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12936-025-05392-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Targeted interventions are often needed to accelerate malaria elimination efforts. Mass screening and treatment (MSAT) involves testing all eligible and consenting individuals in an area for malaria and treating all positive individuals simultaneously. However, there are concerns regarding the impact of MSAT. This study evaluates the impact of MSAT on malaria incidence in Karen State, Myanmar, using routine surveillance data, and investigates the impact of MSAT in other settings through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To investigate the impact of MSAT in Karen State, we retrospectively analysed routine malaria surveillance data collected in 10 villages where MSAT was done in 2018. Pre- and post-MSAT malaria incidences were compared, and a negative binomial mixed-effects model was used to estimate the relative change in monthly incidence for each additional year since MSAT. To investigate the impact of MSAT in other settings, we searched Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science (end date 11th July 2022) for studies assessing the impact of MSAT interventions on the incidence or prevalence of malaria infections. Studies were summarized, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed on studies grouped according to study design and the comparator used to assess the impact of MSAT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 10 villages in Karen State, there was an overall reduction in P. falciparum incidence following MSAT (Incidence Rate Ratio 0.37; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.73). However, this is likely due to the ongoing impact of early diagnosis and treatment services offered in these communities, as shown by an overall reduction in incidence in the surrounding area. Results from nine studies identified in the systematic review demonstrate the variable impact of MSAT, which is likely influenced by a variety of factors, including intervention coverage and uptake, baseline malaria endemicity, and methods used for MSAT delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective analysis and systemic review highlights the complexities behind the success of targeted interventions for malaria elimination. While these interventions are important drivers for achieving elimination goals, particularly in high-burden settings, it is important that various factors be considered when determining their suitability and how to optimize implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaria Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063463/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaria Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05392-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaria Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05392-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:为了加快消除疟疾的努力,往往需要有针对性的干预措施。大规模筛查和治疗(MSAT)涉及在一个地区对所有符合条件和同意的个人进行疟疾检测,并同时对所有阳性个体进行治疗。然而,有人担心MSAT的影响。本研究利用常规监测数据评估了MSAT对缅甸克伦邦疟疾发病率的影响,并通过系统回顾和荟萃分析调查了MSAT在其他情况下的影响。方法:为了调查MSAT对克伦邦的影响,我们回顾性分析了2018年开展MSAT的10个村庄的常规疟疾监测数据。比较了MSAT前后的疟疾发病率,并使用负二项混合效应模型来估计自MSAT以来每增加一年的月发病率的相对变化。为了研究MSAT在其他环境中的影响,我们检索了Scopus、Ovid MEDLINE和Web of Science(截止日期为2022年7月11日),以评估MSAT干预措施对疟疾感染发生率或流行率的影响。对研究进行总结,并根据研究设计和用于评估MSAT影响的比较器对研究进行随机效应荟萃分析。结果:克伦邦10个村实施MSAT后,恶性疟原虫发病率总体下降(发病率比0.37;95% ci: 0.19, 0.73)。然而,这可能是由于这些社区提供的早期诊断和治疗服务的持续影响,正如周围地区发病率总体下降所表明的那样。系统综述中确定的九项研究的结果表明,MSAT的影响是可变的,这可能受到多种因素的影响,包括干预措施的覆盖和吸收、基线疟疾流行以及用于提供MSAT的方法。结论:这项回顾性分析和系统评价突出了目标明确的消除疟疾干预措施成功背后的复杂性。虽然这些干预措施是实现消除目标的重要驱动因素,特别是在高负担环境中,但在确定其适用性和如何优化实施时,重要的是要考虑各种因素。
The impact of mass screening and treatment interventions on malaria incidence and prevalence: a retrospective analysis of a malaria elimination programme in eastern Myanmar, and systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Targeted interventions are often needed to accelerate malaria elimination efforts. Mass screening and treatment (MSAT) involves testing all eligible and consenting individuals in an area for malaria and treating all positive individuals simultaneously. However, there are concerns regarding the impact of MSAT. This study evaluates the impact of MSAT on malaria incidence in Karen State, Myanmar, using routine surveillance data, and investigates the impact of MSAT in other settings through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods: To investigate the impact of MSAT in Karen State, we retrospectively analysed routine malaria surveillance data collected in 10 villages where MSAT was done in 2018. Pre- and post-MSAT malaria incidences were compared, and a negative binomial mixed-effects model was used to estimate the relative change in monthly incidence for each additional year since MSAT. To investigate the impact of MSAT in other settings, we searched Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science (end date 11th July 2022) for studies assessing the impact of MSAT interventions on the incidence or prevalence of malaria infections. Studies were summarized, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed on studies grouped according to study design and the comparator used to assess the impact of MSAT.
Results: In the 10 villages in Karen State, there was an overall reduction in P. falciparum incidence following MSAT (Incidence Rate Ratio 0.37; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.73). However, this is likely due to the ongoing impact of early diagnosis and treatment services offered in these communities, as shown by an overall reduction in incidence in the surrounding area. Results from nine studies identified in the systematic review demonstrate the variable impact of MSAT, which is likely influenced by a variety of factors, including intervention coverage and uptake, baseline malaria endemicity, and methods used for MSAT delivery.
Conclusions: This retrospective analysis and systemic review highlights the complexities behind the success of targeted interventions for malaria elimination. While these interventions are important drivers for achieving elimination goals, particularly in high-burden settings, it is important that various factors be considered when determining their suitability and how to optimize implementation.
期刊介绍:
Malaria Journal is aimed at the scientific community interested in malaria in its broadest sense. It is the only journal that publishes exclusively articles on malaria and, as such, it aims to bring together knowledge from the different specialities involved in this very broad discipline, from the bench to the bedside and to the field.