下肢复杂开放性骨折:从骨固定到皮瓣覆盖的最佳时间是什么?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Stephen F Parlamas, Kylie R Swiekatowski, Bora Kahramangil, Imran Rizvi, Mohin A Bhadkamkar, Yuewei Wu-Fienberg
{"title":"下肢复杂开放性骨折:从骨固定到皮瓣覆盖的最佳时间是什么?","authors":"Stephen F Parlamas, Kylie R Swiekatowski, Bora Kahramangil, Imran Rizvi, Mohin A Bhadkamkar, Yuewei Wu-Fienberg","doi":"10.1055/a-2596-5211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shorter delays from presentation to soft tissue coverage in patients with lower extremity open fractures are associated with fewer infections. Orthoplastic teams should know how long flaps can be safely delayed after internal fixation (IF), rather than presentation, because concurrent life-threatening injuries delay limb salvation. We compared infection rates (IRs) of flap coverage delays within 24, 24 to 72, and over 72 hours of IF.This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients in a Level I trauma center from 2011 to 2021. Patients sustained Gustilo III lower extremity fractures and received flap coverage after fixation. IRs between various delays of flap coverage were compared. A multivariate logistic regression model (including patient demographics, flap composition, bone fixation technique, perioperative antibiotics, three aforementioned time intervals, time from presentation to flap coverage, and time from fixation to flap coverage) was used to determine significant predictors of infections.Of 274 patients, 76 (27.7%) developed an infection. The average time between fixation and flap coverage was 84.9 hours and 106.6 hours in non-infected and infected patients (<i>p</i> = 0.074). IRs among the time intervals were 23.2%, 25.0%, and 31.5% (<i>p</i> = 0.40). Time from fixation to flap coverage was the only significant predictor of infection (<i>p</i> = 0.04).Time from fixation to flap placement is an effective predictor of wound infection. Although the IRs of the >72-hour group did not reach significance, we believe larger cohorts would yield statistical significance. We recommend soft tissue coverage within 72 hours of IF to mitigate infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex Open Fractures of the Lower Extremity: What is the Optimal Time from Bone Fixation to Flap Coverage?\",\"authors\":\"Stephen F Parlamas, Kylie R Swiekatowski, Bora Kahramangil, Imran Rizvi, Mohin A Bhadkamkar, Yuewei Wu-Fienberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2596-5211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Shorter delays from presentation to soft tissue coverage in patients with lower extremity open fractures are associated with fewer infections. Orthoplastic teams should know how long flaps can be safely delayed after internal fixation (IF), rather than presentation, because concurrent life-threatening injuries delay limb salvation. We compared infection rates (IRs) of flap coverage delays within 24, 24 to 72, and over 72 hours of IF.This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients in a Level I trauma center from 2011 to 2021. Patients sustained Gustilo III lower extremity fractures and received flap coverage after fixation. IRs between various delays of flap coverage were compared. A multivariate logistic regression model (including patient demographics, flap composition, bone fixation technique, perioperative antibiotics, three aforementioned time intervals, time from presentation to flap coverage, and time from fixation to flap coverage) was used to determine significant predictors of infections.Of 274 patients, 76 (27.7%) developed an infection. The average time between fixation and flap coverage was 84.9 hours and 106.6 hours in non-infected and infected patients (<i>p</i> = 0.074). IRs among the time intervals were 23.2%, 25.0%, and 31.5% (<i>p</i> = 0.40). Time from fixation to flap coverage was the only significant predictor of infection (<i>p</i> = 0.04).Time from fixation to flap placement is an effective predictor of wound infection. Although the IRs of the >72-hour group did not reach significance, we believe larger cohorts would yield statistical significance. We recommend soft tissue coverage within 72 hours of IF to mitigate infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2596-5211\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2596-5211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:下肢开放性骨折患者从出现到软组织覆盖的延迟时间越短,感染越少。骨科团队应该知道皮瓣在内固定(IF)后可以安全延迟多长时间,而不是时间,因为同时发生的危及生命的损伤会延迟肢体的拯救。我们比较了24小时、24-72小时和超过72小时皮瓣覆盖延迟的感染率(IR)。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2011年至2021年在某一级创伤中心的成年患者。患者持续Gustilo III型下肢骨折,固定后接受皮瓣覆盖。比较了不同皮瓣覆盖延迟间的IR。采用多变量logistic回归模型(包括患者人口统计学、皮瓣组成、骨固定技术、围手术期抗生素、上述三种时间间隔、从出现到皮瓣覆盖的时间、从固定到皮瓣覆盖的时间)来确定感染的显著预测因子。结果:274例患者中,76例(27.7%)发生感染。非感染和感染患者固定和皮瓣覆盖的平均时间分别为84.9小时和106.6小时(p=0.074)。时间间隔间IR分别为23.2%、25.0%和31.5% (p=0.40)。从固定到皮瓣覆盖的时间是感染的唯一显著预测因子(p=0.04)。结论:从固定到皮瓣放置的时间是伤口感染的有效预测指标。虽然bbb72小时组的IR没有达到显著性,但我们相信更大的队列将产生统计学意义。我们建议在72小时内覆盖软组织以减轻感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complex Open Fractures of the Lower Extremity: What is the Optimal Time from Bone Fixation to Flap Coverage?

Shorter delays from presentation to soft tissue coverage in patients with lower extremity open fractures are associated with fewer infections. Orthoplastic teams should know how long flaps can be safely delayed after internal fixation (IF), rather than presentation, because concurrent life-threatening injuries delay limb salvation. We compared infection rates (IRs) of flap coverage delays within 24, 24 to 72, and over 72 hours of IF.This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients in a Level I trauma center from 2011 to 2021. Patients sustained Gustilo III lower extremity fractures and received flap coverage after fixation. IRs between various delays of flap coverage were compared. A multivariate logistic regression model (including patient demographics, flap composition, bone fixation technique, perioperative antibiotics, three aforementioned time intervals, time from presentation to flap coverage, and time from fixation to flap coverage) was used to determine significant predictors of infections.Of 274 patients, 76 (27.7%) developed an infection. The average time between fixation and flap coverage was 84.9 hours and 106.6 hours in non-infected and infected patients (p = 0.074). IRs among the time intervals were 23.2%, 25.0%, and 31.5% (p = 0.40). Time from fixation to flap coverage was the only significant predictor of infection (p = 0.04).Time from fixation to flap placement is an effective predictor of wound infection. Although the IRs of the >72-hour group did not reach significance, we believe larger cohorts would yield statistical significance. We recommend soft tissue coverage within 72 hours of IF to mitigate infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信