《无国界的残疾:冷战欧洲作为中立地带的盲目行动主义和技术的局限》。

IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Maria Cristina Galmarini
{"title":"《无国界的残疾:冷战欧洲作为中立地带的盲目行动主义和技术的局限》。","authors":"Maria Cristina Galmarini","doi":"10.1353/tech.2025.a956849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the Cold War, the European Regional Committee (ERC) of the World Council for the Welfare of the Blind sought to use assistive technologies as neutral tools for fostering depoliticized cooperation across the East-West ideological divide. This article examines the ERC's collaborative projects during the 1970s, arguing that although they facilitated connections between research centers and manufacturers across geopolitical borders, they were ultimately constrained by both activists' conflicting approaches to disability and Cold War political realities. By analyzing the intersections of disability, technology, and geopolitics, the article contributes to our understanding of how global technological collaboration was both enabled and restricted by broader political and cultural forces.</p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"66 2","pages":"381-410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability Without Borders: Blind Activism and the Limits of Technology as Neutral Ground in Cold War Europe.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Cristina Galmarini\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tech.2025.a956849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During the Cold War, the European Regional Committee (ERC) of the World Council for the Welfare of the Blind sought to use assistive technologies as neutral tools for fostering depoliticized cooperation across the East-West ideological divide. This article examines the ERC's collaborative projects during the 1970s, arguing that although they facilitated connections between research centers and manufacturers across geopolitical borders, they were ultimately constrained by both activists' conflicting approaches to disability and Cold War political realities. By analyzing the intersections of disability, technology, and geopolitics, the article contributes to our understanding of how global technological collaboration was both enabled and restricted by broader political and cultural forces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"volume\":\"66 2\",\"pages\":\"381-410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2025.a956849\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2025.a956849","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冷战期间,世界盲人福利理事会的欧洲区域委员会(ERC)试图利用辅助技术作为中立的工具,促进跨越东西方意识形态鸿沟的非政治化合作。本文考察了ERC在20世纪70年代的合作项目,认为尽管它们促进了研究中心和制造商之间跨越地缘政治边界的联系,但它们最终受到了两位活动家对残疾和冷战政治现实的冲突方法的限制。通过分析残疾、技术和地缘政治的交集,本文有助于我们理解全球技术合作是如何受到更广泛的政治和文化力量的推动和限制的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disability Without Borders: Blind Activism and the Limits of Technology as Neutral Ground in Cold War Europe.

During the Cold War, the European Regional Committee (ERC) of the World Council for the Welfare of the Blind sought to use assistive technologies as neutral tools for fostering depoliticized cooperation across the East-West ideological divide. This article examines the ERC's collaborative projects during the 1970s, arguing that although they facilitated connections between research centers and manufacturers across geopolitical borders, they were ultimately constrained by both activists' conflicting approaches to disability and Cold War political realities. By analyzing the intersections of disability, technology, and geopolitics, the article contributes to our understanding of how global technological collaboration was both enabled and restricted by broader political and cultural forces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Culture
Technology and Culture 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信