“这是他们给予反馈的时间;探索坦桑尼亚研究生医学教育中科研监督的障碍和促进因素已成为一个问题。定性研究。

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S512498
Muzdalifat Abeid, Columba Mbekenga, Ahmed Mussa Jusabani, Sherin A Kassamali, Miriam Lucy Mgonja, Mwanaarab Sibuma, Nathanael Sirili, Mariam Noorani
{"title":"“这是他们给予反馈的时间;探索坦桑尼亚研究生医学教育中科研监督的障碍和促进因素已成为一个问题。定性研究。","authors":"Muzdalifat Abeid, Columba Mbekenga, Ahmed Mussa Jusabani, Sherin A Kassamali, Miriam Lucy Mgonja, Mwanaarab Sibuma, Nathanael Sirili, Mariam Noorani","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S512498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research supervision is a multifaceted task that combines academic knowledge with managing interpersonal relationships. Postgraduate trainees often receive inadequate supervision due to their supervisors' demanding schedules and limited supervision competencies. Most supervisors, especially in low-resource settings, lack formal training in supervision and thus rely on personal experiences to fulfil this role. Poor supervision contributes to high dropout rates and subpar research output in many universities. We aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators for research supervision in postgraduate medical education in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adopted an exploratory qualitative case study and conducted key informant interviews with three purposively selected faculty in leadership and four focus group discussions with 14 postgraduate trainees and 10 faculty members. Topic guides focusing on experiences, challenges, and needs were used for data collection. The data were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. A framework matrix was used to summarize and analyze data using an excel workbook. An inductive qualitative data analysis approach was employed using thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two main thematic areas emerged from analysis: Barriers and facilitators for research supervision in postgraduate medical education. Difficulty balancing workload, delays in feedback, limited access to some resources, funding constraints and limited research skills emerged as key barriers. Participants recognised the role of a well-equipped library in facilitating the supervision process and trainees appreciated flexibility from their supervisors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing the identified barriers is crucial to enhance the supervisor-trainee relationship and overall dissertation outcomes. Ensuring protected time for research and strengthening faculty research and supervision skills through targeted training is important to ensure high quality research output.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"685-698"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12047262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"It's the Time they Take to Give Feedback; it has Become a Problem\\\" Exploring Barriers and Facilitators for Research Supervision in Postgraduate Medical Education in Tanzania. A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Muzdalifat Abeid, Columba Mbekenga, Ahmed Mussa Jusabani, Sherin A Kassamali, Miriam Lucy Mgonja, Mwanaarab Sibuma, Nathanael Sirili, Mariam Noorani\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S512498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research supervision is a multifaceted task that combines academic knowledge with managing interpersonal relationships. Postgraduate trainees often receive inadequate supervision due to their supervisors' demanding schedules and limited supervision competencies. Most supervisors, especially in low-resource settings, lack formal training in supervision and thus rely on personal experiences to fulfil this role. Poor supervision contributes to high dropout rates and subpar research output in many universities. We aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators for research supervision in postgraduate medical education in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adopted an exploratory qualitative case study and conducted key informant interviews with three purposively selected faculty in leadership and four focus group discussions with 14 postgraduate trainees and 10 faculty members. Topic guides focusing on experiences, challenges, and needs were used for data collection. The data were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. A framework matrix was used to summarize and analyze data using an excel workbook. An inductive qualitative data analysis approach was employed using thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two main thematic areas emerged from analysis: Barriers and facilitators for research supervision in postgraduate medical education. Difficulty balancing workload, delays in feedback, limited access to some resources, funding constraints and limited research skills emerged as key barriers. Participants recognised the role of a well-equipped library in facilitating the supervision process and trainees appreciated flexibility from their supervisors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing the identified barriers is crucial to enhance the supervisor-trainee relationship and overall dissertation outcomes. Ensuring protected time for research and strengthening faculty research and supervision skills through targeted training is important to ensure high quality research output.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"685-698\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12047262/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S512498\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S512498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究督导是一项综合学术知识与人际关系管理的多方面工作。由于导师的时间安排和监督能力有限,研究生实习生往往得不到足够的监督。大多数监督人员,特别是在资源匮乏的环境中,缺乏正式的监督培训,因此依靠个人经验来履行这一角色。监管不力导致许多大学辍学率高,研究成果不达标。我们的目的是探索坦桑尼亚研究生医学教育中研究监督的障碍和促进因素。方法:采用探索性定性案例研究,对有目的选择的3名领导力教师进行了关键信息访谈,对14名研究生学员和10名教师进行了4次焦点小组讨论。数据收集使用了侧重于经验、挑战和需求的主题指南。这些数据被录音并逐字转录。框架矩阵用于使用excel工作簿对数据进行汇总和分析。采用Braun和Clarke所描述的主题分析的归纳定性数据分析方法。结果:从分析中得出两个主要主题领域:研究生医学教育研究监督的障碍和促进因素。难以平衡工作量、反馈延迟、获得某些资源的机会有限、资金限制和研究技能有限成为主要障碍。与会者认同设施完善的图书馆在促进督导过程中所扮演的角色,而学员亦欣赏督导的灵活性。结论:解决确定的障碍是至关重要的,以加强导师-学员的关系和整体论文成果。确保有保护的研究时间,通过有针对性的培训加强教师的研究和监督技能,对于确保高质量的研究成果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"It's the Time they Take to Give Feedback; it has Become a Problem" Exploring Barriers and Facilitators for Research Supervision in Postgraduate Medical Education in Tanzania. A Qualitative Study.

Background: Research supervision is a multifaceted task that combines academic knowledge with managing interpersonal relationships. Postgraduate trainees often receive inadequate supervision due to their supervisors' demanding schedules and limited supervision competencies. Most supervisors, especially in low-resource settings, lack formal training in supervision and thus rely on personal experiences to fulfil this role. Poor supervision contributes to high dropout rates and subpar research output in many universities. We aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators for research supervision in postgraduate medical education in Tanzania.

Methods: We adopted an exploratory qualitative case study and conducted key informant interviews with three purposively selected faculty in leadership and four focus group discussions with 14 postgraduate trainees and 10 faculty members. Topic guides focusing on experiences, challenges, and needs were used for data collection. The data were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. A framework matrix was used to summarize and analyze data using an excel workbook. An inductive qualitative data analysis approach was employed using thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke.

Results: Two main thematic areas emerged from analysis: Barriers and facilitators for research supervision in postgraduate medical education. Difficulty balancing workload, delays in feedback, limited access to some resources, funding constraints and limited research skills emerged as key barriers. Participants recognised the role of a well-equipped library in facilitating the supervision process and trainees appreciated flexibility from their supervisors.

Conclusion: Addressing the identified barriers is crucial to enhance the supervisor-trainee relationship and overall dissertation outcomes. Ensuring protected time for research and strengthening faculty research and supervision skills through targeted training is important to ensure high quality research output.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信