2021年县级COVID-19政策综合性与成人行为健康:县级COVID-19政策与成人行为健康。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Emily Wright, Emily C Dore, Kaitlyn E Jackson, Guangyi Wang, Mark J Pletcher, Thomas W Carton, Rita Hamad
{"title":"2021年县级COVID-19政策综合性与成人行为健康:县级COVID-19政策与成人行为健康。","authors":"Emily Wright, Emily C Dore, Kaitlyn E Jackson, Guangyi Wang, Mark J Pletcher, Thomas W Carton, Rita Hamad","doi":"10.1007/s11524-025-00982-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epidemiologic research has found worsening behavioral health in the USA since 2020. Local policies may have contributed to these patterns and associated disparities. However, scant research has systematically documented county-level COVID-19-era policymaking or empirically investigated its health impacts. To investigate this question, we linked the US COVID-19 County Policy Database-a novel database with weekly data from 2020 to 2021 on 26 policies for 309 primarily urban counties-to data on adult behavioral health from the cross-sectional 2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (N = 25,600). We created measures of policy comprehensiveness by aggregating individual policies into an overall score, and into three domains: containment/closure, economic response, and public health. Outcomes included any past-30-day use and frequency of use of multiple substances (alcohol, binge alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana, non-marijuana illicit drug use, and vaping) and past-30-day psychological distress. Models adjusted for individual covariates, county fixed effects, and time-varying county-level COVID-19 covariates. We found that increases in overall policy comprehensiveness-and comprehensiveness in each of three domains-over time were not associated with the behavioral health outcomes assessed. Meanwhile, stratified models found some variability in associations across sex, racial/ethnic, education, and urban subgroups. This study established the feasibility, utility, and potential challenges of linking newly available COVID-19-related county policy data with health data to examine county-level policy influences on behavioral health. Further research is needed to inform responses to current behavioral health needs and future public health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"713-725"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"County-Level COVID-19 Policy Comprehensiveness and Adult Behavioral Health during 2021 : County-Level COVID-19 Policy and Adult Behavioral Health.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Wright, Emily C Dore, Kaitlyn E Jackson, Guangyi Wang, Mark J Pletcher, Thomas W Carton, Rita Hamad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11524-025-00982-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Epidemiologic research has found worsening behavioral health in the USA since 2020. Local policies may have contributed to these patterns and associated disparities. However, scant research has systematically documented county-level COVID-19-era policymaking or empirically investigated its health impacts. To investigate this question, we linked the US COVID-19 County Policy Database-a novel database with weekly data from 2020 to 2021 on 26 policies for 309 primarily urban counties-to data on adult behavioral health from the cross-sectional 2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (N = 25,600). We created measures of policy comprehensiveness by aggregating individual policies into an overall score, and into three domains: containment/closure, economic response, and public health. Outcomes included any past-30-day use and frequency of use of multiple substances (alcohol, binge alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana, non-marijuana illicit drug use, and vaping) and past-30-day psychological distress. Models adjusted for individual covariates, county fixed effects, and time-varying county-level COVID-19 covariates. We found that increases in overall policy comprehensiveness-and comprehensiveness in each of three domains-over time were not associated with the behavioral health outcomes assessed. Meanwhile, stratified models found some variability in associations across sex, racial/ethnic, education, and urban subgroups. This study established the feasibility, utility, and potential challenges of linking newly available COVID-19-related county policy data with health data to examine county-level policy influences on behavioral health. Further research is needed to inform responses to current behavioral health needs and future public health emergencies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"713-725\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279665/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-025-00982-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-025-00982-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流行病学研究发现,自2020年以来,美国的行为健康状况正在恶化。地方政策可能导致了这些模式和相关的差异。然而,很少有研究系统地记录了县级covid -19时代的政策制定或实证调查了其对健康的影响。为了调查这个问题,我们将美国COVID-19县政策数据库(一个包含2020年至2021年309个主要城市县26项政策的每周数据的新数据库)与来自2021年全国药物使用和健康横断面调查(N = 25,600)的成人行为健康数据联系起来。我们通过将个别政策汇总成总分,并将其分为三个领域:遏制/关闭、经济应对和公共卫生,创建了政策综合性的衡量标准。结果包括过去30天的任何使用和使用多种物质(酒精、酗酒、香烟、大麻、非大麻非法药物使用和电子烟)的频率以及过去30天的心理困扰。模型调整了个体协变量、县固定效应和时变的县级COVID-19协变量。我们发现,随着时间的推移,整体政策的全面性(三个领域的全面性)的增加与评估的行为健康结果无关。与此同时,分层模型发现性别、种族/民族、教育程度和城市亚群体之间存在一些差异。本研究确定了将新获得的与covid -19相关的县政策数据与卫生数据联系起来的可行性、实用性和潜在挑战,以研究县级政策对行为健康的影响。需要进一步研究,以便为应对当前行为健康需求和未来突发公共卫生事件提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
County-Level COVID-19 Policy Comprehensiveness and Adult Behavioral Health during 2021 : County-Level COVID-19 Policy and Adult Behavioral Health.

Epidemiologic research has found worsening behavioral health in the USA since 2020. Local policies may have contributed to these patterns and associated disparities. However, scant research has systematically documented county-level COVID-19-era policymaking or empirically investigated its health impacts. To investigate this question, we linked the US COVID-19 County Policy Database-a novel database with weekly data from 2020 to 2021 on 26 policies for 309 primarily urban counties-to data on adult behavioral health from the cross-sectional 2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (N = 25,600). We created measures of policy comprehensiveness by aggregating individual policies into an overall score, and into three domains: containment/closure, economic response, and public health. Outcomes included any past-30-day use and frequency of use of multiple substances (alcohol, binge alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana, non-marijuana illicit drug use, and vaping) and past-30-day psychological distress. Models adjusted for individual covariates, county fixed effects, and time-varying county-level COVID-19 covariates. We found that increases in overall policy comprehensiveness-and comprehensiveness in each of three domains-over time were not associated with the behavioral health outcomes assessed. Meanwhile, stratified models found some variability in associations across sex, racial/ethnic, education, and urban subgroups. This study established the feasibility, utility, and potential challenges of linking newly available COVID-19-related county policy data with health data to examine county-level policy influences on behavioral health. Further research is needed to inform responses to current behavioral health needs and future public health emergencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Urban Health is the premier and authoritative source of rigorous analyses to advance the health and well-being of people in cities. The Journal provides a platform for interdisciplinary exploration of the evidence base for the broader determinants of health and health inequities needed to strengthen policies, programs, and governance for urban health. The Journal publishes original data, case studies, commentaries, book reviews, executive summaries of selected reports, and proceedings from important global meetings. It welcomes submissions presenting new analytic methods, including systems science approaches to urban problem solving. Finally, the Journal provides a forum linking scholars, practitioners, civil society, and policy makers from the multiple sectors that can influence the health of urban populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信