与听力损失相关的痴呆事件的人口归因比例。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Emily Ishak, Emily A Burg, James Russell Pike, Pablo Martinez Amezcua, Kening Jiang, Danielle S Powell, Alison R Huang, Jonathan J Suen, Pamela L Lutsey, A Richey Sharrett, Josef Coresh, Nicholas S Reed, Jennifer A Deal, Jason R Smith
{"title":"与听力损失相关的痴呆事件的人口归因比例。","authors":"Emily Ishak, Emily A Burg, James Russell Pike, Pablo Martinez Amezcua, Kening Jiang, Danielle S Powell, Alison R Huang, Jonathan J Suen, Pamela L Lutsey, A Richey Sharrett, Josef Coresh, Nicholas S Reed, Jennifer A Deal, Jason R Smith","doi":"10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Hearing loss treatment delays cognitive decline in high-risk older adults. The preventive potential of addressing hearing loss on incident dementia in a community-based population of older adults, and whether it varies by method of hearing loss measurement, is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To calculate the population attributable fraction of incident dementia associated with hearing loss in older adults and to investigate differences by age, sex, self-reported race, and method of hearing loss measurement.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This prospective cohort study was part of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS) and had up to 8 years of follow-up (2011-2019). The 4 ARIC field centers in the study included Jackson, Mississippi; Forsyth County, North Carolina; the Minneapolis suburbs, Minnesota; and Washington County, Maryland. Community-dwelling older adults aged 66 to 90 years without dementia at baseline who underwent a hearing assessment at ARIC-NCS visit 6 (2016-2017) were included in the analysis. Data analysis took place between June 2022 and July 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Hearing loss measured objectively (audiometric) and subjectively (self-reported).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcome was incident dementia (standardized algorithmic diagnosis with expert panel review). The population attributable fractions of dementia from both audiometric and self-reported hearing loss were calculated in the same participants, which quantified the maximum proportion of dementia risk in the population that can be attributed to hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2946 participants (mean [SD] age, 74.9 [4.6] years; 1751 [59.4] female; 637 Black [21.6%] and 2309 White [78.4%] individuals), 1947 participants (66.1%) had audiometric hearing loss, and 1097 (37.2%) had self-reported hearing loss. The population attributable fraction of dementia from any audiometric hearing loss was 32.0% (95% CI, 11.0%-46.5%). Population attributable fractions were similar by hearing loss severity (mild HL: 16.2% [95% CI, 4.2%-24.2%]; moderate or greater HL: 16.6% [95% CI, 3.9%-24.3%]). Self-reported hearing loss was not associated with an increased risk for dementia, so the population attributable fraction was not quantifiable. Population attributable fractions from audiometric hearing loss were larger among those who were 75 years and older (30.5% [95% CI, -5.8% to 53.1%]), female (30.8% [95% CI, 5.9%-47.1%]), and White (27.8% [95% CI, -6.0% to 49.8%]), relative to those who were younger than 75 years, male, and Black.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cohort study suggests that treating hearing loss might delay dementia for a large number of older adults. Public health interventions targeting clinically significant audiometric hearing loss might have broad benefits for dementia prevention. Future research quantifying population attributable fractions should carefully consider which measures are used to define hearing loss, as self-reporting may underestimate hearing-associated dementia risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":14632,"journal":{"name":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12006913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population Attributable Fraction of Incident Dementia Associated With Hearing Loss.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Ishak, Emily A Burg, James Russell Pike, Pablo Martinez Amezcua, Kening Jiang, Danielle S Powell, Alison R Huang, Jonathan J Suen, Pamela L Lutsey, A Richey Sharrett, Josef Coresh, Nicholas S Reed, Jennifer A Deal, Jason R Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Hearing loss treatment delays cognitive decline in high-risk older adults. The preventive potential of addressing hearing loss on incident dementia in a community-based population of older adults, and whether it varies by method of hearing loss measurement, is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To calculate the population attributable fraction of incident dementia associated with hearing loss in older adults and to investigate differences by age, sex, self-reported race, and method of hearing loss measurement.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This prospective cohort study was part of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS) and had up to 8 years of follow-up (2011-2019). The 4 ARIC field centers in the study included Jackson, Mississippi; Forsyth County, North Carolina; the Minneapolis suburbs, Minnesota; and Washington County, Maryland. Community-dwelling older adults aged 66 to 90 years without dementia at baseline who underwent a hearing assessment at ARIC-NCS visit 6 (2016-2017) were included in the analysis. Data analysis took place between June 2022 and July 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Hearing loss measured objectively (audiometric) and subjectively (self-reported).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcome was incident dementia (standardized algorithmic diagnosis with expert panel review). The population attributable fractions of dementia from both audiometric and self-reported hearing loss were calculated in the same participants, which quantified the maximum proportion of dementia risk in the population that can be attributed to hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2946 participants (mean [SD] age, 74.9 [4.6] years; 1751 [59.4] female; 637 Black [21.6%] and 2309 White [78.4%] individuals), 1947 participants (66.1%) had audiometric hearing loss, and 1097 (37.2%) had self-reported hearing loss. The population attributable fraction of dementia from any audiometric hearing loss was 32.0% (95% CI, 11.0%-46.5%). Population attributable fractions were similar by hearing loss severity (mild HL: 16.2% [95% CI, 4.2%-24.2%]; moderate or greater HL: 16.6% [95% CI, 3.9%-24.3%]). Self-reported hearing loss was not associated with an increased risk for dementia, so the population attributable fraction was not quantifiable. Population attributable fractions from audiometric hearing loss were larger among those who were 75 years and older (30.5% [95% CI, -5.8% to 53.1%]), female (30.8% [95% CI, 5.9%-47.1%]), and White (27.8% [95% CI, -6.0% to 49.8%]), relative to those who were younger than 75 years, male, and Black.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cohort study suggests that treating hearing loss might delay dementia for a large number of older adults. Public health interventions targeting clinically significant audiometric hearing loss might have broad benefits for dementia prevention. Future research quantifying population attributable fractions should carefully consider which measures are used to define hearing loss, as self-reporting may underestimate hearing-associated dementia risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12006913/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0192\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0192","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:听力损失治疗可延缓高风险老年人的认知能力下降。在以社区为基础的老年人人群中,解决听力损失对痴呆的预防潜力,以及听力损失测量方法是否不同,目前尚不清楚。目的:计算老年人与听力损失相关的痴呆事件的人口归因比例,并调查年龄、性别、自我报告的种族和听力损失测量方法的差异。设计、环境和参与者:这项前瞻性队列研究是社区神经认知研究(ARIC-NCS)动脉粥样硬化风险的一部分,随访时间长达8年(2011-2019)。研究中的4个ARIC现场中心包括密西西比州的杰克逊;北卡罗莱纳州福赛斯县;明尼苏达州的明尼阿波利斯郊区;以及马里兰州的华盛顿县。在ARIC-NCS访问6(2016-2017)期间接受听力评估的66 - 90岁无痴呆基线的社区居住老年人纳入分析。数据分析在2022年6月至2024年7月期间进行。暴露:听力损失测量客观(听力测量)和主观(自我报告)。主要结局和衡量指标:主要结局为痴呆发生率(标准化算法诊断与专家小组评审)。在相同的参与者中计算由听力测量和自我报告的听力损失引起的痴呆症的人群归因分数,从而量化可归因于听力损失的人群中痴呆症风险的最大比例。结果:2946名参与者(平均[SD]年龄74.9[4.6]岁;1751[59.4]女性;637名黑人[21.6%]和2309名白人[78.4%]),1947名参与者(66.1%)有听力损失,1097名参与者(37.2%)有自我报告的听力损失。由听力损失引起的痴呆的人群归因比例为32.0% (95% CI, 11.0%-46.5%)。听力损失严重程度的人群归因分数相似(轻度HL: 16.2% [95% CI, 4.2%-24.2%];中度或重度HL: 16.6% [95% CI, 3.9%-24.3%])。自我报告的听力损失与痴呆风险增加无关,因此人口归因比例无法量化。听力损失的人群归因分数在75岁及以上人群(30.5% [95% CI, -5.8%至53.1%])、女性(30.8% [95% CI, 5.9%至47.1%])和白人(27.8% [95% CI, -6.0%至49.8%])中高于75岁以下人群、男性和黑人。结论和相关性:这项队列研究表明,治疗听力损失可能会延缓大量老年人的痴呆。针对临床显著听力损失的公共卫生干预措施可能对预防痴呆有广泛的益处。未来量化人群归因分数的研究应仔细考虑使用哪些指标来定义听力损失,因为自我报告可能低估了听力相关痴呆的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Population Attributable Fraction of Incident Dementia Associated With Hearing Loss.

Importance: Hearing loss treatment delays cognitive decline in high-risk older adults. The preventive potential of addressing hearing loss on incident dementia in a community-based population of older adults, and whether it varies by method of hearing loss measurement, is unknown.

Objective: To calculate the population attributable fraction of incident dementia associated with hearing loss in older adults and to investigate differences by age, sex, self-reported race, and method of hearing loss measurement.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective cohort study was part of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS) and had up to 8 years of follow-up (2011-2019). The 4 ARIC field centers in the study included Jackson, Mississippi; Forsyth County, North Carolina; the Minneapolis suburbs, Minnesota; and Washington County, Maryland. Community-dwelling older adults aged 66 to 90 years without dementia at baseline who underwent a hearing assessment at ARIC-NCS visit 6 (2016-2017) were included in the analysis. Data analysis took place between June 2022 and July 2024.

Exposures: Hearing loss measured objectively (audiometric) and subjectively (self-reported).

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was incident dementia (standardized algorithmic diagnosis with expert panel review). The population attributable fractions of dementia from both audiometric and self-reported hearing loss were calculated in the same participants, which quantified the maximum proportion of dementia risk in the population that can be attributed to hearing loss.

Results: Among 2946 participants (mean [SD] age, 74.9 [4.6] years; 1751 [59.4] female; 637 Black [21.6%] and 2309 White [78.4%] individuals), 1947 participants (66.1%) had audiometric hearing loss, and 1097 (37.2%) had self-reported hearing loss. The population attributable fraction of dementia from any audiometric hearing loss was 32.0% (95% CI, 11.0%-46.5%). Population attributable fractions were similar by hearing loss severity (mild HL: 16.2% [95% CI, 4.2%-24.2%]; moderate or greater HL: 16.6% [95% CI, 3.9%-24.3%]). Self-reported hearing loss was not associated with an increased risk for dementia, so the population attributable fraction was not quantifiable. Population attributable fractions from audiometric hearing loss were larger among those who were 75 years and older (30.5% [95% CI, -5.8% to 53.1%]), female (30.8% [95% CI, 5.9%-47.1%]), and White (27.8% [95% CI, -6.0% to 49.8%]), relative to those who were younger than 75 years, male, and Black.

Conclusions and relevance: This cohort study suggests that treating hearing loss might delay dementia for a large number of older adults. Public health interventions targeting clinically significant audiometric hearing loss might have broad benefits for dementia prevention. Future research quantifying population attributable fractions should carefully consider which measures are used to define hearing loss, as self-reporting may underestimate hearing-associated dementia risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
230
期刊介绍: JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery is a globally recognized and peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to providing up-to-date information on diseases affecting the head and neck. It originated in 1925 as Archives of Otolaryngology and currently serves as the official publication for the American Head and Neck Society. As part of the prestigious JAMA Network, a collection of reputable general medical and specialty publications, it ensures the highest standards of research and expertise. Physicians and scientists worldwide rely on JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery for invaluable insights in this specialized field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信