{"title":"两种超声舌头成像设备在语言病理学中的可用性。","authors":"Isabelle Marcoux, Lucie Ménard, Catherine Laporte","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ultrasound tongue imaging is a promising tool in speech-language pathology; however, little is known about the usability of ultrasound scanners for speech-language pathologists (SLPs), who typically have low familiarity with ultrasound imaging. This study looks at the usability of two ultrasound scanner models for SLPs: a Sonosite all-in-one scanner with a wired probe, and a Clarius wireless probe scanner, used with a tablet app.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twelve SLPs and phonetics experts (all female) participated in two filmed sessions in our lab where they learned to use the two models of scanners with custom-written manuals. Each scanner was used in each session to complete a simple task including recording videos of their or the experimenter's tongue. After each use of a scanner, participants completed a modified and translated version of the System Usability Scale. The time required to complete the task was measured. Two expert judges rated the quality of the video recordings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants took less time to complete the task and improved their choice of settings from the first to the second session, regardless of the scanner being used. In the usability scale, SLPs showed a higher satisfaction with the wireless tablet interface than with the all-in-one ultrasound interface. The tablet interface with the wireless scanner also allowed better choices of settings. However, in the second session, positioning of the probe was better with the all-in-one scanner, which has a smaller and lighter probe.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For SLPs, the usability of a wireless ultrasound scanner with a mobile application seems better than that of an all-in-one scanner. However, its cumbersome probe seems to hamper probe positioning. Future studies should include a lightweight ultrasound scanner that connects via USB to a laptop or tablet and provide image interpretation training for the SLPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":"34 3","pages":"1407-1424"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability of Two Ultrasound Tongue Imaging Devices in Speech-Language Pathology.\",\"authors\":\"Isabelle Marcoux, Lucie Ménard, Catherine Laporte\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ultrasound tongue imaging is a promising tool in speech-language pathology; however, little is known about the usability of ultrasound scanners for speech-language pathologists (SLPs), who typically have low familiarity with ultrasound imaging. This study looks at the usability of two ultrasound scanner models for SLPs: a Sonosite all-in-one scanner with a wired probe, and a Clarius wireless probe scanner, used with a tablet app.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twelve SLPs and phonetics experts (all female) participated in two filmed sessions in our lab where they learned to use the two models of scanners with custom-written manuals. Each scanner was used in each session to complete a simple task including recording videos of their or the experimenter's tongue. After each use of a scanner, participants completed a modified and translated version of the System Usability Scale. The time required to complete the task was measured. Two expert judges rated the quality of the video recordings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants took less time to complete the task and improved their choice of settings from the first to the second session, regardless of the scanner being used. In the usability scale, SLPs showed a higher satisfaction with the wireless tablet interface than with the all-in-one ultrasound interface. The tablet interface with the wireless scanner also allowed better choices of settings. However, in the second session, positioning of the probe was better with the all-in-one scanner, which has a smaller and lighter probe.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For SLPs, the usability of a wireless ultrasound scanner with a mobile application seems better than that of an all-in-one scanner. However, its cumbersome probe seems to hamper probe positioning. Future studies should include a lightweight ultrasound scanner that connects via USB to a laptop or tablet and provide image interpretation training for the SLPs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"1407-1424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00293\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Usability of Two Ultrasound Tongue Imaging Devices in Speech-Language Pathology.
Purpose: Ultrasound tongue imaging is a promising tool in speech-language pathology; however, little is known about the usability of ultrasound scanners for speech-language pathologists (SLPs), who typically have low familiarity with ultrasound imaging. This study looks at the usability of two ultrasound scanner models for SLPs: a Sonosite all-in-one scanner with a wired probe, and a Clarius wireless probe scanner, used with a tablet app.
Method: Twelve SLPs and phonetics experts (all female) participated in two filmed sessions in our lab where they learned to use the two models of scanners with custom-written manuals. Each scanner was used in each session to complete a simple task including recording videos of their or the experimenter's tongue. After each use of a scanner, participants completed a modified and translated version of the System Usability Scale. The time required to complete the task was measured. Two expert judges rated the quality of the video recordings.
Results: Participants took less time to complete the task and improved their choice of settings from the first to the second session, regardless of the scanner being used. In the usability scale, SLPs showed a higher satisfaction with the wireless tablet interface than with the all-in-one ultrasound interface. The tablet interface with the wireless scanner also allowed better choices of settings. However, in the second session, positioning of the probe was better with the all-in-one scanner, which has a smaller and lighter probe.
Conclusions: For SLPs, the usability of a wireless ultrasound scanner with a mobile application seems better than that of an all-in-one scanner. However, its cumbersome probe seems to hamper probe positioning. Future studies should include a lightweight ultrasound scanner that connects via USB to a laptop or tablet and provide image interpretation training for the SLPs.
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.