2型糖尿病强化收缩压控制的最佳效益:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素ii型受体阻滞剂的关键作用

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000004037
Rui-Ting Lin, Jing-Wei Gao, Yong-Cong Yang, Xue-Wen Chen, Zhen-Jie Gu, Lei-Gang Tian, Zhe-Lin Chen, Ling-Yu Zhang
{"title":"2型糖尿病强化收缩压控制的最佳效益:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素ii型受体阻滞剂的关键作用","authors":"Rui-Ting Lin, Jing-Wei Gao, Yong-Cong Yang, Xue-Wen Chen, Zhen-Jie Gu, Lei-Gang Tian, Zhe-Lin Chen, Ling-Yu Zhang","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Intensive SBP control reduces major cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension, but no information regarding the preferred antihypertensive regimen could be available. The present study aims to investigate the most effective antihypertensive regimen for reducing MACE in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants from the ACCORD BP trial with intensive SBP control were included. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the effects of various antihypertensive regimens on MACE and all-cause mortality. Cost-effectiveness analysis was evaluated using the Markov model. Potential deaths averted were projected based on the referenced data from NHANES cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2362 patients with T2DM and hypertension were included. ACEI/ARB-based antihypertensive regimen, but not other antihypertensive drugs-based ones, were associated with a reduced risk of MACE, and the protective efficiencies were similar across the whole cohort (standard and intensive glycemia control), intensive SBP control cohort [hazard ratio = 0.558, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.420-0.741], standard glycemia/intensive SBP control cohort (hazard ratio = 0.563, 95% CI: 0.373-0. 850), and propensity score-matched standard glycemia/intensive SBP control cohort (hazard ratio = 0.522, 95% CI: 0.315-0.864). The protections were more prominent in patients with older age, CVD history, baseline SBP at least 140 mmHg, and higher Framingham score. All-cause mortality was also reduced with this regimen. Moreover, it was predicted to increase 2.18 quality-adjusted life years and to produce $29 611.97 net monetary benefit and was projected to prevent 494 742 deaths per year in the USA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with hypertension and T2DM, ACEI/ARB is the mandatory antihypertensive medication if intensive SBP control implemented for better clinical benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"1214-1224"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing benefits of intensive SBP control in type 2 diabetes: the crucial role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-II type 2 receptor blockers.\",\"authors\":\"Rui-Ting Lin, Jing-Wei Gao, Yong-Cong Yang, Xue-Wen Chen, Zhen-Jie Gu, Lei-Gang Tian, Zhe-Lin Chen, Ling-Yu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Intensive SBP control reduces major cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension, but no information regarding the preferred antihypertensive regimen could be available. The present study aims to investigate the most effective antihypertensive regimen for reducing MACE in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants from the ACCORD BP trial with intensive SBP control were included. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the effects of various antihypertensive regimens on MACE and all-cause mortality. Cost-effectiveness analysis was evaluated using the Markov model. Potential deaths averted were projected based on the referenced data from NHANES cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2362 patients with T2DM and hypertension were included. ACEI/ARB-based antihypertensive regimen, but not other antihypertensive drugs-based ones, were associated with a reduced risk of MACE, and the protective efficiencies were similar across the whole cohort (standard and intensive glycemia control), intensive SBP control cohort [hazard ratio = 0.558, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.420-0.741], standard glycemia/intensive SBP control cohort (hazard ratio = 0.563, 95% CI: 0.373-0. 850), and propensity score-matched standard glycemia/intensive SBP control cohort (hazard ratio = 0.522, 95% CI: 0.315-0.864). The protections were more prominent in patients with older age, CVD history, baseline SBP at least 140 mmHg, and higher Framingham score. All-cause mortality was also reduced with this regimen. Moreover, it was predicted to increase 2.18 quality-adjusted life years and to produce $29 611.97 net monetary benefit and was projected to prevent 494 742 deaths per year in the USA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with hypertension and T2DM, ACEI/ARB is the mandatory antihypertensive medication if intensive SBP control implemented for better clinical benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1214-1224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004037\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:强化收缩压控制可降低2型糖尿病(T2DM)合并高血压患者的主要心血管事件(MACE),但没有关于首选降压方案的信息。本研究旨在探讨降低这些患者MACE的最有效降压方案。方法:纳入强化收缩压控制的ACCORD BP试验的参与者。采用Cox比例风险模型分析各种降压方案对MACE和全因死亡率的影响。采用马尔可夫模型进行成本-效果分析。根据NHANES队列的参考数据预测可能避免的死亡。结果:共纳入2362例T2DM合并高血压患者。以ACEI/ arb为基础的降压方案与MACE风险降低相关,而非其他降压药物为基础的降压方案,并且整个队列(标准和强化血糖控制)、强化收缩压控制队列(风险比= 0.558,95%可信区间(95% CI): 0.42 -0.741)、标准血糖/强化收缩压控制队列(风险比= 0.563,95% CI: 0.373-0)的保护效率相似。850)和倾向评分匹配的标准血糖/强化收血压对照队列(风险比= 0.522,95% CI: 0.315-0.864)。在年龄较大、有心血管疾病史、基线收缩压至少140 mmHg和Framingham评分较高的患者中,这种保护作用更为突出。该方案也降低了全因死亡率。此外,预计它将增加2.18个质量调整生命年,产生29611.97美元的净货币效益,预计在美国每年可防止494742人死亡。结论:在高血压合并T2DM患者中,如果强化收缩压控制以获得更好的临床疗效,ACEI/ARB是强制性降压药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing benefits of intensive SBP control in type 2 diabetes: the crucial role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-II type 2 receptor blockers.

Aims: Intensive SBP control reduces major cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension, but no information regarding the preferred antihypertensive regimen could be available. The present study aims to investigate the most effective antihypertensive regimen for reducing MACE in these patients.

Methods: Participants from the ACCORD BP trial with intensive SBP control were included. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the effects of various antihypertensive regimens on MACE and all-cause mortality. Cost-effectiveness analysis was evaluated using the Markov model. Potential deaths averted were projected based on the referenced data from NHANES cohort.

Results: A total of 2362 patients with T2DM and hypertension were included. ACEI/ARB-based antihypertensive regimen, but not other antihypertensive drugs-based ones, were associated with a reduced risk of MACE, and the protective efficiencies were similar across the whole cohort (standard and intensive glycemia control), intensive SBP control cohort [hazard ratio = 0.558, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.420-0.741], standard glycemia/intensive SBP control cohort (hazard ratio = 0.563, 95% CI: 0.373-0. 850), and propensity score-matched standard glycemia/intensive SBP control cohort (hazard ratio = 0.522, 95% CI: 0.315-0.864). The protections were more prominent in patients with older age, CVD history, baseline SBP at least 140 mmHg, and higher Framingham score. All-cause mortality was also reduced with this regimen. Moreover, it was predicted to increase 2.18 quality-adjusted life years and to produce $29 611.97 net monetary benefit and was projected to prevent 494 742 deaths per year in the USA.

Conclusion: In patients with hypertension and T2DM, ACEI/ARB is the mandatory antihypertensive medication if intensive SBP control implemented for better clinical benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hypertension
Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1389
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信