Lindsay L Kephart, Vaughan W Rees, Daniel P Giovenco, S V Subramanian
{"title":"美国休闲大麻零售商的不平等地理分布","authors":"Lindsay L Kephart, Vaughan W Rees, Daniel P Giovenco, S V Subramanian","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although more U.S. states continue to legalize the sale of cannabis for recreational adult-use, little is known about the spatial distribution of cannabis retailers in relation to neighborhood characteristics. The objective of this study is to examine the presence or absence of cannabis retailers in census tracts in relation to measures of neighborhood advantage and disadvantage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 2023 U.S. state agency lists, we identified 5586 recreational cannabis retailers and geocoded address data in 18 states with recreational cannabis legalization laws. Multilevel logistic and negative binomial regression was used to model the association between quintiles of the neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) and index of concentration at the extremes (ICE) with census tract cannabis retailer presence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the study states, 11% of census tracts had at least 1 recreational cannabis retailer. Census tracts with higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation, or racialized and economic disadvantage, had a significantly higher odds and rate of having cannabis retailers. In the adjusted analysis, tracts with the greatest concentration of low-income Black or Hispanic residents had 2.0 to 2.5 times the odds of cannabis retailer presence compared to more advantaged tracts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In states with legalized nonmedical cannabis, there is a pattern of greater cannabis retailer presence in areas with the greatest neighborhood disadvantage. Public health agencies and policymakers should support the implementation of policies that reduce cannabis retailer clustering and enhance targeted prevention efforts in historically disadvantaged areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"107643"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Unequal Geography of Recreational Cannabis Retailers in the U.S.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay L Kephart, Vaughan W Rees, Daniel P Giovenco, S V Subramanian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although more U.S. states continue to legalize the sale of cannabis for recreational adult-use, little is known about the spatial distribution of cannabis retailers in relation to neighborhood characteristics. The objective of this study is to examine the presence or absence of cannabis retailers in census tracts in relation to measures of neighborhood advantage and disadvantage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 2023 U.S. state agency lists, we identified 5586 recreational cannabis retailers and geocoded address data in 18 states with recreational cannabis legalization laws. Multilevel logistic and negative binomial regression was used to model the association between quintiles of the neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) and index of concentration at the extremes (ICE) with census tract cannabis retailer presence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the study states, 11% of census tracts had at least 1 recreational cannabis retailer. Census tracts with higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation, or racialized and economic disadvantage, had a significantly higher odds and rate of having cannabis retailers. In the adjusted analysis, tracts with the greatest concentration of low-income Black or Hispanic residents had 2.0 to 2.5 times the odds of cannabis retailer presence compared to more advantaged tracts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In states with legalized nonmedical cannabis, there is a pattern of greater cannabis retailer presence in areas with the greatest neighborhood disadvantage. Public health agencies and policymakers should support the implementation of policies that reduce cannabis retailer clustering and enhance targeted prevention efforts in historically disadvantaged areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107643\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Unequal Geography of Recreational Cannabis Retailers in the U.S.
Introduction: Although more U.S. states continue to legalize the sale of cannabis for recreational adult-use, little is known about the spatial distribution of cannabis retailers in relation to neighborhood characteristics. The objective of this study is to examine the presence or absence of cannabis retailers in census tracts in relation to measures of neighborhood advantage and disadvantage.
Methods: Using 2023 U.S. state agency lists, we identified 5586 recreational cannabis retailers and geocoded address data in 18 states with recreational cannabis legalization laws. Multilevel logistic and negative binomial regression was used to model the association between quintiles of the neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) and index of concentration at the extremes (ICE) with census tract cannabis retailer presence.
Results: Across the study states, 11% of census tracts had at least 1 recreational cannabis retailer. Census tracts with higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation, or racialized and economic disadvantage, had a significantly higher odds and rate of having cannabis retailers. In the adjusted analysis, tracts with the greatest concentration of low-income Black or Hispanic residents had 2.0 to 2.5 times the odds of cannabis retailer presence compared to more advantaged tracts.
Conclusion: In states with legalized nonmedical cannabis, there is a pattern of greater cannabis retailer presence in areas with the greatest neighborhood disadvantage. Public health agencies and policymakers should support the implementation of policies that reduce cannabis retailer clustering and enhance targeted prevention efforts in historically disadvantaged areas.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.