四名专业教师单学科设计中四种语音治疗概念的初步探讨。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Elizabeth U Grillo
{"title":"四名专业教师单学科设计中四种语音治疗概念的初步探讨。","authors":"Elizabeth U Grillo","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Global Voice Prevention and Therapy Model (GVPTM) with the Estill Voice Model (EVM) involves four concepts: 1) training multiple new voice targets to meet all the vocal demands of the client, 2) using an integrated implicit-explicit instructional approach, 3) switching between voice targets, and 4) facilitating voice practice in a bottom-up speech hierarchy. As a preliminary investigation into the four concepts, the current study compared the GVPTM with EVM to a modified version of the GVPTM (MGVPTM) with EVM that eliminated concepts 1 (only one new resonant voice was trained) and 3 (no switching between voice targets) and kept concepts 2 and 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four professional teachers were randomized into one of two conditions in a single-subject design counterbalanced with alternating treatments and baselines (ie, A<sub>1</sub>BA<sub>2</sub>CA<sub>3</sub> or A<sub>1</sub>CA<sub>2</sub>BA<sub>3</sub>). In condition 1 (A<sub>1</sub>BA<sub>2</sub>CA<sub>3</sub>), the GVPTM was first followed by MGVPTM. In condition 2 (A<sub>1</sub>CA<sub>2</sub>BA<sub>3</sub>), the MGVPTM was first followed by the GVPTM. Baseline measures included fundamental frequency (f<sub>o</sub>), participant self-ratings of overall voice quality, roughness, and strain, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-10, Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI), survey questions, and answers to questions via an exit interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated significant differences for f<sub>o</sub> and self-ratings of overall vocal quality, roughness, and strain from pre to post for the GVPTM and MGVPTM. VHI-10 and VFI factors 1, 2, and 3 yielded no differences from pre to post. Overall, the participants viewed all four concepts in the GVPTM favorably and suggested it was limiting to learn only one new resonant voice with no switching between voice targets in the MGVPTM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Speech-language pathologists may consider using all four concepts in voice therapy sessions represented via targets, ingredients, and mechanisms of action of the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary Investigation of Four Voice Therapy Concepts in a Single-Subject Design with Four Professional Teachers.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth U Grillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.04.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Global Voice Prevention and Therapy Model (GVPTM) with the Estill Voice Model (EVM) involves four concepts: 1) training multiple new voice targets to meet all the vocal demands of the client, 2) using an integrated implicit-explicit instructional approach, 3) switching between voice targets, and 4) facilitating voice practice in a bottom-up speech hierarchy. As a preliminary investigation into the four concepts, the current study compared the GVPTM with EVM to a modified version of the GVPTM (MGVPTM) with EVM that eliminated concepts 1 (only one new resonant voice was trained) and 3 (no switching between voice targets) and kept concepts 2 and 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four professional teachers were randomized into one of two conditions in a single-subject design counterbalanced with alternating treatments and baselines (ie, A<sub>1</sub>BA<sub>2</sub>CA<sub>3</sub> or A<sub>1</sub>CA<sub>2</sub>BA<sub>3</sub>). In condition 1 (A<sub>1</sub>BA<sub>2</sub>CA<sub>3</sub>), the GVPTM was first followed by MGVPTM. In condition 2 (A<sub>1</sub>CA<sub>2</sub>BA<sub>3</sub>), the MGVPTM was first followed by the GVPTM. Baseline measures included fundamental frequency (f<sub>o</sub>), participant self-ratings of overall voice quality, roughness, and strain, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-10, Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI), survey questions, and answers to questions via an exit interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated significant differences for f<sub>o</sub> and self-ratings of overall vocal quality, roughness, and strain from pre to post for the GVPTM and MGVPTM. VHI-10 and VFI factors 1, 2, and 3 yielded no differences from pre to post. Overall, the participants viewed all four concepts in the GVPTM favorably and suggested it was limiting to learn only one new resonant voice with no switching between voice targets in the MGVPTM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Speech-language pathologists may consider using all four concepts in voice therapy sessions represented via targets, ingredients, and mechanisms of action of the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.04.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.04.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:全球语音预防和治疗模型(GVPTM)与静止语音模型(EVM)包括四个概念:1)训练多个新的语音目标以满足客户的所有语音需求,2)使用内隐-外显综合教学方法,3)在语音目标之间切换,4)在自下而上的语音层次中促进语音练习。作为对这四个概念的初步调查,本研究将GVPTM与EVM进行了比较,并将带有EVM的GVPTM与带有EVM的改良版GVPTM (MGVPTM)进行了比较,后者消除了概念1(只训练了一个新的共振声音)和3(没有在声音目标之间切换),并保留了概念2和4。方法:将4名专业教师随机分为A1BA2CA3或A1CA2BA3两组,采用交替处理和基线平衡的单受试者设计。在条件1 (A1BA2CA3), GVPTM首先是MGVPTM。在条件2 (A1CA2BA3)中,MGVPTM首先是GVPTM。基线测量包括基本频率(fo)、参与者对整体声音质量、粗糙度和张力的自我评价、声音障碍指数(VHI)-10、声音疲劳指数(VFI)、调查问题以及通过离职面谈对问题的回答。结果:结果表明GVPTM和MGVPTM在前后的整体音质,粗糙度和应变的fo和自评上存在显著差异。VHI-10和VFI因子1、2和3在前后没有差异。总体而言,参与者对GVPTM中的所有四个概念都持赞成态度,并认为只学习一种新的共振声音,而不在MGVPTM中的声音目标之间切换是有限的。结论:语言病理学家可以考虑在语音治疗过程中使用所有四个概念,通过康复治疗规范系统的目标、成分和作用机制来表示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preliminary Investigation of Four Voice Therapy Concepts in a Single-Subject Design with Four Professional Teachers.

Purpose: The Global Voice Prevention and Therapy Model (GVPTM) with the Estill Voice Model (EVM) involves four concepts: 1) training multiple new voice targets to meet all the vocal demands of the client, 2) using an integrated implicit-explicit instructional approach, 3) switching between voice targets, and 4) facilitating voice practice in a bottom-up speech hierarchy. As a preliminary investigation into the four concepts, the current study compared the GVPTM with EVM to a modified version of the GVPTM (MGVPTM) with EVM that eliminated concepts 1 (only one new resonant voice was trained) and 3 (no switching between voice targets) and kept concepts 2 and 4.

Methods: Four professional teachers were randomized into one of two conditions in a single-subject design counterbalanced with alternating treatments and baselines (ie, A1BA2CA3 or A1CA2BA3). In condition 1 (A1BA2CA3), the GVPTM was first followed by MGVPTM. In condition 2 (A1CA2BA3), the MGVPTM was first followed by the GVPTM. Baseline measures included fundamental frequency (fo), participant self-ratings of overall voice quality, roughness, and strain, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-10, Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI), survey questions, and answers to questions via an exit interview.

Results: The results indicated significant differences for fo and self-ratings of overall vocal quality, roughness, and strain from pre to post for the GVPTM and MGVPTM. VHI-10 and VFI factors 1, 2, and 3 yielded no differences from pre to post. Overall, the participants viewed all four concepts in the GVPTM favorably and suggested it was limiting to learn only one new resonant voice with no switching between voice targets in the MGVPTM.

Conclusions: Speech-language pathologists may consider using all four concepts in voice therapy sessions represented via targets, ingredients, and mechanisms of action of the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信