{"title":"四名专业教师单学科设计中四种语音治疗概念的初步探讨。","authors":"Elizabeth U Grillo","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Global Voice Prevention and Therapy Model (GVPTM) with the Estill Voice Model (EVM) involves four concepts: 1) training multiple new voice targets to meet all the vocal demands of the client, 2) using an integrated implicit-explicit instructional approach, 3) switching between voice targets, and 4) facilitating voice practice in a bottom-up speech hierarchy. As a preliminary investigation into the four concepts, the current study compared the GVPTM with EVM to a modified version of the GVPTM (MGVPTM) with EVM that eliminated concepts 1 (only one new resonant voice was trained) and 3 (no switching between voice targets) and kept concepts 2 and 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four professional teachers were randomized into one of two conditions in a single-subject design counterbalanced with alternating treatments and baselines (ie, A<sub>1</sub>BA<sub>2</sub>CA<sub>3</sub> or A<sub>1</sub>CA<sub>2</sub>BA<sub>3</sub>). In condition 1 (A<sub>1</sub>BA<sub>2</sub>CA<sub>3</sub>), the GVPTM was first followed by MGVPTM. In condition 2 (A<sub>1</sub>CA<sub>2</sub>BA<sub>3</sub>), the MGVPTM was first followed by the GVPTM. Baseline measures included fundamental frequency (f<sub>o</sub>), participant self-ratings of overall voice quality, roughness, and strain, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-10, Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI), survey questions, and answers to questions via an exit interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated significant differences for f<sub>o</sub> and self-ratings of overall vocal quality, roughness, and strain from pre to post for the GVPTM and MGVPTM. VHI-10 and VFI factors 1, 2, and 3 yielded no differences from pre to post. Overall, the participants viewed all four concepts in the GVPTM favorably and suggested it was limiting to learn only one new resonant voice with no switching between voice targets in the MGVPTM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Speech-language pathologists may consider using all four concepts in voice therapy sessions represented via targets, ingredients, and mechanisms of action of the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary Investigation of Four Voice Therapy Concepts in a Single-Subject Design with Four Professional Teachers.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth U Grillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.04.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Global Voice Prevention and Therapy Model (GVPTM) with the Estill Voice Model (EVM) involves four concepts: 1) training multiple new voice targets to meet all the vocal demands of the client, 2) using an integrated implicit-explicit instructional approach, 3) switching between voice targets, and 4) facilitating voice practice in a bottom-up speech hierarchy. As a preliminary investigation into the four concepts, the current study compared the GVPTM with EVM to a modified version of the GVPTM (MGVPTM) with EVM that eliminated concepts 1 (only one new resonant voice was trained) and 3 (no switching between voice targets) and kept concepts 2 and 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four professional teachers were randomized into one of two conditions in a single-subject design counterbalanced with alternating treatments and baselines (ie, A<sub>1</sub>BA<sub>2</sub>CA<sub>3</sub> or A<sub>1</sub>CA<sub>2</sub>BA<sub>3</sub>). In condition 1 (A<sub>1</sub>BA<sub>2</sub>CA<sub>3</sub>), the GVPTM was first followed by MGVPTM. In condition 2 (A<sub>1</sub>CA<sub>2</sub>BA<sub>3</sub>), the MGVPTM was first followed by the GVPTM. Baseline measures included fundamental frequency (f<sub>o</sub>), participant self-ratings of overall voice quality, roughness, and strain, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-10, Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI), survey questions, and answers to questions via an exit interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated significant differences for f<sub>o</sub> and self-ratings of overall vocal quality, roughness, and strain from pre to post for the GVPTM and MGVPTM. VHI-10 and VFI factors 1, 2, and 3 yielded no differences from pre to post. Overall, the participants viewed all four concepts in the GVPTM favorably and suggested it was limiting to learn only one new resonant voice with no switching between voice targets in the MGVPTM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Speech-language pathologists may consider using all four concepts in voice therapy sessions represented via targets, ingredients, and mechanisms of action of the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.04.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.04.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preliminary Investigation of Four Voice Therapy Concepts in a Single-Subject Design with Four Professional Teachers.
Purpose: The Global Voice Prevention and Therapy Model (GVPTM) with the Estill Voice Model (EVM) involves four concepts: 1) training multiple new voice targets to meet all the vocal demands of the client, 2) using an integrated implicit-explicit instructional approach, 3) switching between voice targets, and 4) facilitating voice practice in a bottom-up speech hierarchy. As a preliminary investigation into the four concepts, the current study compared the GVPTM with EVM to a modified version of the GVPTM (MGVPTM) with EVM that eliminated concepts 1 (only one new resonant voice was trained) and 3 (no switching between voice targets) and kept concepts 2 and 4.
Methods: Four professional teachers were randomized into one of two conditions in a single-subject design counterbalanced with alternating treatments and baselines (ie, A1BA2CA3 or A1CA2BA3). In condition 1 (A1BA2CA3), the GVPTM was first followed by MGVPTM. In condition 2 (A1CA2BA3), the MGVPTM was first followed by the GVPTM. Baseline measures included fundamental frequency (fo), participant self-ratings of overall voice quality, roughness, and strain, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-10, Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI), survey questions, and answers to questions via an exit interview.
Results: The results indicated significant differences for fo and self-ratings of overall vocal quality, roughness, and strain from pre to post for the GVPTM and MGVPTM. VHI-10 and VFI factors 1, 2, and 3 yielded no differences from pre to post. Overall, the participants viewed all four concepts in the GVPTM favorably and suggested it was limiting to learn only one new resonant voice with no switching between voice targets in the MGVPTM.
Conclusions: Speech-language pathologists may consider using all four concepts in voice therapy sessions represented via targets, ingredients, and mechanisms of action of the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.