Matias Kanniainen, Vesa Laatikainen-Raussi, Teemu Pukkila, Krista Vohlakari, Esa Hynynen, Johanna K Ihalainen, Esa Räsänen
{"title":"基于RR区间动态相关性的运行阈值估计。","authors":"Matias Kanniainen, Vesa Laatikainen-Raussi, Teemu Pukkila, Krista Vohlakari, Esa Hynynen, Johanna K Ihalainen, Esa Räsänen","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We study the estimation of aerobic threshold (AeT) and anaerobic threshold (AnT) using dynamical detrended fluctuation analysis (DDFA). Conventionally, the thresholds are estimated in laboratory settings, where the subject performs an incremental exercise test on a cycloergometer or treadmill. We compared DDFA-based thresholds (DDFAT<sub>1</sub> and DDFAT<sub>2</sub>) with lactate thresholds (LT<sub>1</sub> and LT<sub>2</sub>) and examined thresholds derived from theoretical and measured maximal heart rates (HR). The analysis was conducted on 58 subjects undergoing an incremental treadmill running test. Our findings indicate significant discrepancies between thresholds derived from theoretical and measured maximal HRs compared to lactate thresholds. Specifically, theoretical maximal HR thresholds consistently underestimated lactate thresholds, exhibiting systematic bias. Measured maximal HR thresholds also showed a consistent underestimation, though with improved alignment to lactate thresholds. In contrast, the DDFA-based method demonstrated reasonable agreement with lactate thresholds and lacked systematic bias. The DDFA-based approach offers a simple and accurate alternative for estimating AeT and AnT. Its potential for continuous monitoring makes it suitable for integration into wearable devices such as smartwatches and heart rate monitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 9","pages":"e70241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Threshold estimation in running using dynamical correlations of RR intervals.\",\"authors\":\"Matias Kanniainen, Vesa Laatikainen-Raussi, Teemu Pukkila, Krista Vohlakari, Esa Hynynen, Johanna K Ihalainen, Esa Räsänen\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.70241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We study the estimation of aerobic threshold (AeT) and anaerobic threshold (AnT) using dynamical detrended fluctuation analysis (DDFA). Conventionally, the thresholds are estimated in laboratory settings, where the subject performs an incremental exercise test on a cycloergometer or treadmill. We compared DDFA-based thresholds (DDFAT<sub>1</sub> and DDFAT<sub>2</sub>) with lactate thresholds (LT<sub>1</sub> and LT<sub>2</sub>) and examined thresholds derived from theoretical and measured maximal heart rates (HR). The analysis was conducted on 58 subjects undergoing an incremental treadmill running test. Our findings indicate significant discrepancies between thresholds derived from theoretical and measured maximal HRs compared to lactate thresholds. Specifically, theoretical maximal HR thresholds consistently underestimated lactate thresholds, exhibiting systematic bias. Measured maximal HR thresholds also showed a consistent underestimation, though with improved alignment to lactate thresholds. In contrast, the DDFA-based method demonstrated reasonable agreement with lactate thresholds and lacked systematic bias. The DDFA-based approach offers a simple and accurate alternative for estimating AeT and AnT. Its potential for continuous monitoring makes it suitable for integration into wearable devices such as smartwatches and heart rate monitors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"e70241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064344/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Threshold estimation in running using dynamical correlations of RR intervals.
We study the estimation of aerobic threshold (AeT) and anaerobic threshold (AnT) using dynamical detrended fluctuation analysis (DDFA). Conventionally, the thresholds are estimated in laboratory settings, where the subject performs an incremental exercise test on a cycloergometer or treadmill. We compared DDFA-based thresholds (DDFAT1 and DDFAT2) with lactate thresholds (LT1 and LT2) and examined thresholds derived from theoretical and measured maximal heart rates (HR). The analysis was conducted on 58 subjects undergoing an incremental treadmill running test. Our findings indicate significant discrepancies between thresholds derived from theoretical and measured maximal HRs compared to lactate thresholds. Specifically, theoretical maximal HR thresholds consistently underestimated lactate thresholds, exhibiting systematic bias. Measured maximal HR thresholds also showed a consistent underestimation, though with improved alignment to lactate thresholds. In contrast, the DDFA-based method demonstrated reasonable agreement with lactate thresholds and lacked systematic bias. The DDFA-based approach offers a simple and accurate alternative for estimating AeT and AnT. Its potential for continuous monitoring makes it suitable for integration into wearable devices such as smartwatches and heart rate monitors.
期刊介绍:
Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.