基于RR区间动态相关性的运行阈值估计。

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Matias Kanniainen, Vesa Laatikainen-Raussi, Teemu Pukkila, Krista Vohlakari, Esa Hynynen, Johanna K Ihalainen, Esa Räsänen
{"title":"基于RR区间动态相关性的运行阈值估计。","authors":"Matias Kanniainen, Vesa Laatikainen-Raussi, Teemu Pukkila, Krista Vohlakari, Esa Hynynen, Johanna K Ihalainen, Esa Räsänen","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We study the estimation of aerobic threshold (AeT) and anaerobic threshold (AnT) using dynamical detrended fluctuation analysis (DDFA). Conventionally, the thresholds are estimated in laboratory settings, where the subject performs an incremental exercise test on a cycloergometer or treadmill. We compared DDFA-based thresholds (DDFAT<sub>1</sub> and DDFAT<sub>2</sub>) with lactate thresholds (LT<sub>1</sub> and LT<sub>2</sub>) and examined thresholds derived from theoretical and measured maximal heart rates (HR). The analysis was conducted on 58 subjects undergoing an incremental treadmill running test. Our findings indicate significant discrepancies between thresholds derived from theoretical and measured maximal HRs compared to lactate thresholds. Specifically, theoretical maximal HR thresholds consistently underestimated lactate thresholds, exhibiting systematic bias. Measured maximal HR thresholds also showed a consistent underestimation, though with improved alignment to lactate thresholds. In contrast, the DDFA-based method demonstrated reasonable agreement with lactate thresholds and lacked systematic bias. The DDFA-based approach offers a simple and accurate alternative for estimating AeT and AnT. Its potential for continuous monitoring makes it suitable for integration into wearable devices such as smartwatches and heart rate monitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 9","pages":"e70241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Threshold estimation in running using dynamical correlations of RR intervals.\",\"authors\":\"Matias Kanniainen, Vesa Laatikainen-Raussi, Teemu Pukkila, Krista Vohlakari, Esa Hynynen, Johanna K Ihalainen, Esa Räsänen\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.70241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We study the estimation of aerobic threshold (AeT) and anaerobic threshold (AnT) using dynamical detrended fluctuation analysis (DDFA). Conventionally, the thresholds are estimated in laboratory settings, where the subject performs an incremental exercise test on a cycloergometer or treadmill. We compared DDFA-based thresholds (DDFAT<sub>1</sub> and DDFAT<sub>2</sub>) with lactate thresholds (LT<sub>1</sub> and LT<sub>2</sub>) and examined thresholds derived from theoretical and measured maximal heart rates (HR). The analysis was conducted on 58 subjects undergoing an incremental treadmill running test. Our findings indicate significant discrepancies between thresholds derived from theoretical and measured maximal HRs compared to lactate thresholds. Specifically, theoretical maximal HR thresholds consistently underestimated lactate thresholds, exhibiting systematic bias. Measured maximal HR thresholds also showed a consistent underestimation, though with improved alignment to lactate thresholds. In contrast, the DDFA-based method demonstrated reasonable agreement with lactate thresholds and lacked systematic bias. The DDFA-based approach offers a simple and accurate alternative for estimating AeT and AnT. Its potential for continuous monitoring makes it suitable for integration into wearable devices such as smartwatches and heart rate monitors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"e70241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064344/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了动态去趋势波动分析(DDFA)对好氧阈值(AeT)和厌氧阈值(AnT)的估计。通常,阈值是在实验室环境中估计的,受试者在循环计量器或跑步机上进行增量运动测试。我们比较了基于ddfa的阈值(DDFAT1和DDFAT2)和乳酸阈值(LT1和LT2),并检查了从理论和测量的最大心率(HR)得出的阈值。对58名接受渐进式跑步机试验的受试者进行了分析。我们的研究结果表明,与乳酸阈值相比,理论和测量的最大hr阈值之间存在显著差异。具体而言,理论最大HR阈值始终低估乳酸阈值,表现出系统性偏差。测量的最大HR阈值也显示出一致的低估,尽管与乳酸阈值的对齐有所改善。相比之下,基于ddfa的方法与乳酸阈值表现出合理的一致性,并且缺乏系统偏差。基于ddfa的方法为估计AeT和AnT提供了一种简单而准确的替代方法。它具有持续监测的潜力,因此适合集成到智能手表和心率监测器等可穿戴设备中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Threshold estimation in running using dynamical correlations of RR intervals.

We study the estimation of aerobic threshold (AeT) and anaerobic threshold (AnT) using dynamical detrended fluctuation analysis (DDFA). Conventionally, the thresholds are estimated in laboratory settings, where the subject performs an incremental exercise test on a cycloergometer or treadmill. We compared DDFA-based thresholds (DDFAT1 and DDFAT2) with lactate thresholds (LT1 and LT2) and examined thresholds derived from theoretical and measured maximal heart rates (HR). The analysis was conducted on 58 subjects undergoing an incremental treadmill running test. Our findings indicate significant discrepancies between thresholds derived from theoretical and measured maximal HRs compared to lactate thresholds. Specifically, theoretical maximal HR thresholds consistently underestimated lactate thresholds, exhibiting systematic bias. Measured maximal HR thresholds also showed a consistent underestimation, though with improved alignment to lactate thresholds. In contrast, the DDFA-based method demonstrated reasonable agreement with lactate thresholds and lacked systematic bias. The DDFA-based approach offers a simple and accurate alternative for estimating AeT and AnT. Its potential for continuous monitoring makes it suitable for integration into wearable devices such as smartwatches and heart rate monitors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信