Astrid Carolina Valdivia-Tapia, Anderson Takeo Hara, Frank Lippert
{"title":"含氟牙膏和无氟漱口水预防牙齿脱矿:TMR-D常规和单切片技术研究。","authors":"Astrid Carolina Valdivia-Tapia, Anderson Takeo Hara, Frank Lippert","doi":"10.1111/ipd.13315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of fluoride-free mouthwashes (FFM) can adversely affect the anticaries benefits of fluoride toothpaste.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigated (i) the impact of FFM on the anticaries benefits of fluoride toothpaste and (ii) differences in enamel-lesion assessment between two TMR techniques.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study followed a 2 (technique) × 2 (toothpaste) × 4 (mouthwash) factorial design. Toothpaste (1100 ppm F) contained either NaF or SnF<sub>2</sub>. Mouthwashes contained CPC or EOs. Control mouthwashes were DIW and not washed after toothpaste. Two TMR techniques, conventional specimens and single sections of enamel (n = 8), were utilized. During the 5-day/pH cycling, the specimens with artificial caries-like lesions were treated two times/day with toothpaste/1 min, followed by mouthwash/30s. There was a 4 h demineralization/day. Integrated mineral loss (ΔΔZ) and lesion depth (ΔL) were determined. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant interaction between the three factors for ΔΔZ (p = 0.894) or ΔL (p = 0.410) and no difference between toothpaste for ΔΔZ (p = 0.977) or ΔL (p = 0.507). However, mouthwashes affected ΔΔZ and ΔL (both p < 0.001). The non-wash group resulted in the most remineralization. The technique did not affect ΔΔZ (p = 0.973).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fluoride-free mouthwashes may decrease the remineralization potential of fluoride toothpaste, and the single-section technique is a suitable alternative in caries research. Pediatric dentists can emphasize proper hygiene and parental guidance in supervising children's brushing/rinsing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14268,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevention of Dental Demineralization by Fluoride Toothpastes Followed by Fluoride-Free Mouthwashes: A TMR-D Conventional and Single-Section Technique Study.\",\"authors\":\"Astrid Carolina Valdivia-Tapia, Anderson Takeo Hara, Frank Lippert\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ipd.13315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of fluoride-free mouthwashes (FFM) can adversely affect the anticaries benefits of fluoride toothpaste.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigated (i) the impact of FFM on the anticaries benefits of fluoride toothpaste and (ii) differences in enamel-lesion assessment between two TMR techniques.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study followed a 2 (technique) × 2 (toothpaste) × 4 (mouthwash) factorial design. Toothpaste (1100 ppm F) contained either NaF or SnF<sub>2</sub>. Mouthwashes contained CPC or EOs. Control mouthwashes were DIW and not washed after toothpaste. Two TMR techniques, conventional specimens and single sections of enamel (n = 8), were utilized. During the 5-day/pH cycling, the specimens with artificial caries-like lesions were treated two times/day with toothpaste/1 min, followed by mouthwash/30s. There was a 4 h demineralization/day. Integrated mineral loss (ΔΔZ) and lesion depth (ΔL) were determined. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant interaction between the three factors for ΔΔZ (p = 0.894) or ΔL (p = 0.410) and no difference between toothpaste for ΔΔZ (p = 0.977) or ΔL (p = 0.507). However, mouthwashes affected ΔΔZ and ΔL (both p < 0.001). The non-wash group resulted in the most remineralization. The technique did not affect ΔΔZ (p = 0.973).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fluoride-free mouthwashes may decrease the remineralization potential of fluoride toothpaste, and the single-section technique is a suitable alternative in caries research. Pediatric dentists can emphasize proper hygiene and parental guidance in supervising children's brushing/rinsing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13315\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevention of Dental Demineralization by Fluoride Toothpastes Followed by Fluoride-Free Mouthwashes: A TMR-D Conventional and Single-Section Technique Study.
Background: The use of fluoride-free mouthwashes (FFM) can adversely affect the anticaries benefits of fluoride toothpaste.
Aim: This study investigated (i) the impact of FFM on the anticaries benefits of fluoride toothpaste and (ii) differences in enamel-lesion assessment between two TMR techniques.
Design: The study followed a 2 (technique) × 2 (toothpaste) × 4 (mouthwash) factorial design. Toothpaste (1100 ppm F) contained either NaF or SnF2. Mouthwashes contained CPC or EOs. Control mouthwashes were DIW and not washed after toothpaste. Two TMR techniques, conventional specimens and single sections of enamel (n = 8), were utilized. During the 5-day/pH cycling, the specimens with artificial caries-like lesions were treated two times/day with toothpaste/1 min, followed by mouthwash/30s. There was a 4 h demineralization/day. Integrated mineral loss (ΔΔZ) and lesion depth (ΔL) were determined. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA.
Results: There was no statistically significant interaction between the three factors for ΔΔZ (p = 0.894) or ΔL (p = 0.410) and no difference between toothpaste for ΔΔZ (p = 0.977) or ΔL (p = 0.507). However, mouthwashes affected ΔΔZ and ΔL (both p < 0.001). The non-wash group resulted in the most remineralization. The technique did not affect ΔΔZ (p = 0.973).
Conclusion: Fluoride-free mouthwashes may decrease the remineralization potential of fluoride toothpaste, and the single-section technique is a suitable alternative in caries research. Pediatric dentists can emphasize proper hygiene and parental guidance in supervising children's brushing/rinsing.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry was formed in 1991 by the merger of the Journals of the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry and the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry and is published bi-monthly. It has true international scope and aims to promote the highest standard of education, practice and research in paediatric dentistry world-wide.
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry publishes papers on all aspects of paediatric dentistry including: growth and development, behaviour management, diagnosis, prevention, restorative treatment and issue relating to medically compromised children or those with disabilities. This peer-reviewed journal features scientific articles, reviews, case reports, clinical techniques, short communications and abstracts of current paediatric dental research. Analytical studies with a scientific novelty value are preferred to descriptive studies. Case reports illustrating unusual conditions and clinically relevant observations are acceptable but must be of sufficiently high quality to be considered for publication; particularly the illustrative material must be of the highest quality.