调查主要农艺干预措施对欧洲耕地中瓢虫和蜘蛛的影响:一项系统审查协议。

IF 3.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Coralie Triquet, Yvonne Fabian, Philippe Jeanneret
{"title":"调查主要农艺干预措施对欧洲耕地中瓢虫和蜘蛛的影响:一项系统审查协议。","authors":"Coralie Triquet, Yvonne Fabian, Philippe Jeanneret","doi":"10.1186/s13750-025-00359-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Designing agroecological cropping systems enhancing functional biodiversity and natural pest regulations requires understanding the ecological processes involved, specifically regarding the response of generalist predators. A more precise knowledge of the changes in ground-dwelling communities implied by individual agronomic interventions is needed to make enlightened and consistent choices in the design of such innovative cropping systems. A recent systematic map showed that fertilization, tillage, pesticides use, grazing and mowing are the most studied agronomic interventions regarding their effects on arthropods. The direct and indirect effects of disturbances induced by agronomic interventions on ground-dwelling arthropods in arable fields have been widely investigated, especially for carabids and spiders. However, there is not always a clear pattern outstanding, probably due to antagonistic responses of species with different functional traits. Here, we propose a quantified synthesis on this topic. We will show the impact of the main agronomic interventions in arable fields on the two most studied ground-dwelling predator groups, carabids and spiders, and compare their response (abundance, species richness, taxonomic and functional diversity) in different contexts (crop types and production methods). We will investigate contrasting responses at different taxonomic levels depending on functional traits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The evidence will be identified from the recent systematic map on the impacts of agricultural management practices on biodiversity indicator species groups published in 2024. We will select all studies reporting the effect of the most studied agronomic interventions (fertilization, tillage, pesticide application, mowing and grazing) in arable fields (arable crops and temporary grasslands) on carabids and spiders in the map database. A search update will be performed using the search strings used for the systematic map for carabids and spiders, and extracted references will be sorted at title, abstract and full text levels according to the topic of the present work. All selected studies will be critically appraised and a low, medium, or high risk of bias will be assigned to each study. The synthesis of the data extracted from the studies will be first narrative (using qualitative data), and then quantitative for those with adequate data for a meta-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48621,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Evidence","volume":"14 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the effects of the main agronomic interventions on carabids and spiders in European arable fields: A systematic review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Coralie Triquet, Yvonne Fabian, Philippe Jeanneret\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13750-025-00359-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Designing agroecological cropping systems enhancing functional biodiversity and natural pest regulations requires understanding the ecological processes involved, specifically regarding the response of generalist predators. A more precise knowledge of the changes in ground-dwelling communities implied by individual agronomic interventions is needed to make enlightened and consistent choices in the design of such innovative cropping systems. A recent systematic map showed that fertilization, tillage, pesticides use, grazing and mowing are the most studied agronomic interventions regarding their effects on arthropods. The direct and indirect effects of disturbances induced by agronomic interventions on ground-dwelling arthropods in arable fields have been widely investigated, especially for carabids and spiders. However, there is not always a clear pattern outstanding, probably due to antagonistic responses of species with different functional traits. Here, we propose a quantified synthesis on this topic. We will show the impact of the main agronomic interventions in arable fields on the two most studied ground-dwelling predator groups, carabids and spiders, and compare their response (abundance, species richness, taxonomic and functional diversity) in different contexts (crop types and production methods). We will investigate contrasting responses at different taxonomic levels depending on functional traits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The evidence will be identified from the recent systematic map on the impacts of agricultural management practices on biodiversity indicator species groups published in 2024. We will select all studies reporting the effect of the most studied agronomic interventions (fertilization, tillage, pesticide application, mowing and grazing) in arable fields (arable crops and temporary grasslands) on carabids and spiders in the map database. A search update will be performed using the search strings used for the systematic map for carabids and spiders, and extracted references will be sorted at title, abstract and full text levels according to the topic of the present work. All selected studies will be critically appraised and a low, medium, or high risk of bias will be assigned to each study. The synthesis of the data extracted from the studies will be first narrative (using qualitative data), and then quantitative for those with adequate data for a meta-analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Evidence\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008925/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-025-00359-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-025-00359-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:设计生态农业种植系统,增强功能生物多样性和自然害虫控制,需要了解所涉及的生态过程,特别是关于多面手捕食者的反应。为了在设计这种创新的种植制度时做出明智和一致的选择,需要更精确地了解个别农业干预所隐含的地面居住社区的变化。最近的一份系统地图显示,施肥、耕作、农药使用、放牧和割草是对节肢动物影响研究最多的农艺干预措施。农艺干预对耕地地栖节肢动物的直接和间接影响已被广泛研究,特别是对瓢虫和蜘蛛的影响。然而,可能是由于不同功能性状的物种的拮抗反应不同,因此并不总是有一个明确的模式。在这里,我们提出了一个关于这个主题的量化综合。我们将展示主要农艺干预措施对研究最多的两种地面捕食者群体——瓢虫和蜘蛛的影响,并比较它们在不同环境(作物类型和生产方式)下的反应(丰度、物种丰富度、分类和功能多样性)。我们将根据不同的功能性状在不同的分类水平上研究不同的反应。方法:从最近于2024年发表的农业管理措施对生物多样性指标物种群影响的系统图中确定证据。我们将在地图数据库中选择所有报告在耕地(耕地和临时草地)中研究最多的农艺干预措施(施肥、耕作、农药施用、割草和放牧)对瓢虫和蜘蛛的影响的研究。将使用用于carabids和spider系统地图的搜索字符串执行搜索更新,并根据当前工作的主题按标题、摘要和全文级别对提取的参考文献进行排序。所有入选的研究都将被严格评估,每项研究将被分配低、中、高偏倚风险。从研究中提取的数据的综合将首先是叙述性的(使用定性数据),然后对那些有足够数据进行meta分析的数据进行定量分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the effects of the main agronomic interventions on carabids and spiders in European arable fields: A systematic review protocol.

Background: Designing agroecological cropping systems enhancing functional biodiversity and natural pest regulations requires understanding the ecological processes involved, specifically regarding the response of generalist predators. A more precise knowledge of the changes in ground-dwelling communities implied by individual agronomic interventions is needed to make enlightened and consistent choices in the design of such innovative cropping systems. A recent systematic map showed that fertilization, tillage, pesticides use, grazing and mowing are the most studied agronomic interventions regarding their effects on arthropods. The direct and indirect effects of disturbances induced by agronomic interventions on ground-dwelling arthropods in arable fields have been widely investigated, especially for carabids and spiders. However, there is not always a clear pattern outstanding, probably due to antagonistic responses of species with different functional traits. Here, we propose a quantified synthesis on this topic. We will show the impact of the main agronomic interventions in arable fields on the two most studied ground-dwelling predator groups, carabids and spiders, and compare their response (abundance, species richness, taxonomic and functional diversity) in different contexts (crop types and production methods). We will investigate contrasting responses at different taxonomic levels depending on functional traits.

Methods: The evidence will be identified from the recent systematic map on the impacts of agricultural management practices on biodiversity indicator species groups published in 2024. We will select all studies reporting the effect of the most studied agronomic interventions (fertilization, tillage, pesticide application, mowing and grazing) in arable fields (arable crops and temporary grasslands) on carabids and spiders in the map database. A search update will be performed using the search strings used for the systematic map for carabids and spiders, and extracted references will be sorted at title, abstract and full text levels according to the topic of the present work. All selected studies will be critically appraised and a low, medium, or high risk of bias will be assigned to each study. The synthesis of the data extracted from the studies will be first narrative (using qualitative data), and then quantitative for those with adequate data for a meta-analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Evidence
Environmental Evidence Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Evidence is the journal of the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (CEE). The Journal facilitates rapid publication of evidence syntheses, in the form of Systematic Reviews and Maps conducted to CEE Guidelines and Standards. We focus on the effectiveness of environmental management interventions and the impact of human activities on the environment. Our scope covers all forms of environmental management and human impacts and therefore spans the natural and social sciences. Subjects include water security, agriculture, food security, forestry, fisheries, natural resource management, biodiversity conservation, climate change, ecosystem services, pollution, invasive species, environment and human wellbeing, sustainable energy use, soil management, environmental legislation, environmental education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信