评估人工耳蜗患者摘除设备后的患者动机。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Robert J Macielak, Lisa Zhang, Diana Hallak, Desi P Schoo, Edward E Dodson, Oliver F Adunka, Yin Ren
{"title":"评估人工耳蜗患者摘除设备后的患者动机。","authors":"Robert J Macielak, Lisa Zhang, Diana Hallak, Desi P Schoo, Edward E Dodson, Oliver F Adunka, Yin Ren","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess indications behind cochlear implant (CI) removal without subsequent re-implantation.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients who underwent CI explantation between January 2013 and December 2022.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Explantation of CI device without ipsilateral re-implantation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Indications for and audiometric testing before CI explantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within a cohort of 743 CI patients, 35 patients (5%) underwent implant revision. A total of 16 patients (2%) underwent explantation without ipsilateral re-implantation (mean age of 51 yr [SD, 23]), and 19 (3%) underwent explantation followed by re-implantation (mean age of 51 yr [SD, 18]). The average time between CI insertion and removal was 56 months (SD, 72). Six explantations (6 of 16 [37.5%]) were due to infectious complications: 2 (13%) did not undergo re-implantation given severe life-threatening comorbidities, 1 (6%) underwent simultaneous contralateral implantation, 1 (6%) experienced insurance barriers preventing re-implantation, and 2 (13%) were lost to follow-up. Ten patients (10 of 16 [62.5%]) underwent device removal for noninfectious indications, including 6 (38%) with non-audiologic symptoms attributed to CI, 3 (19%) who required repeated MRIs and desired avoidance of peri-imaging procedures, and 1 (6%) who had poor audiometric outcomes due to cochlear ossification. Patients who were not re-implanted performed worse on AzBio (35% versus 59%; p = 0.10) and CNC testing (27% versus. 70%; p = 0.02) after initial successful implantation compared with those who did undergo re-implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergo explantation for a variety of reasons, with ill-defined symptoms being the motive in over half of the cases. These desires are compounded by poor postoperative audiometric performance, which likely hinders the patient's desire to undergo re-implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Patient Motivation Behind Device Removal in Cochlear Implant Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Robert J Macielak, Lisa Zhang, Diana Hallak, Desi P Schoo, Edward E Dodson, Oliver F Adunka, Yin Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess indications behind cochlear implant (CI) removal without subsequent re-implantation.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients who underwent CI explantation between January 2013 and December 2022.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Explantation of CI device without ipsilateral re-implantation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Indications for and audiometric testing before CI explantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within a cohort of 743 CI patients, 35 patients (5%) underwent implant revision. A total of 16 patients (2%) underwent explantation without ipsilateral re-implantation (mean age of 51 yr [SD, 23]), and 19 (3%) underwent explantation followed by re-implantation (mean age of 51 yr [SD, 18]). The average time between CI insertion and removal was 56 months (SD, 72). Six explantations (6 of 16 [37.5%]) were due to infectious complications: 2 (13%) did not undergo re-implantation given severe life-threatening comorbidities, 1 (6%) underwent simultaneous contralateral implantation, 1 (6%) experienced insurance barriers preventing re-implantation, and 2 (13%) were lost to follow-up. Ten patients (10 of 16 [62.5%]) underwent device removal for noninfectious indications, including 6 (38%) with non-audiologic symptoms attributed to CI, 3 (19%) who required repeated MRIs and desired avoidance of peri-imaging procedures, and 1 (6%) who had poor audiometric outcomes due to cochlear ossification. Patients who were not re-implanted performed worse on AzBio (35% versus 59%; p = 0.10) and CNC testing (27% versus. 70%; p = 0.02) after initial successful implantation compared with those who did undergo re-implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergo explantation for a variety of reasons, with ill-defined symptoms being the motive in over half of the cases. These desires are compounded by poor postoperative audiometric performance, which likely hinders the patient's desire to undergo re-implantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004513\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨人工耳蜗摘除后不再次植入的适应证。患者:2013年1月至2022年12月间接受CI移植的患者。干预措施:取出CI装置,不进行同侧再植。主要观察指标:CI植入术前的适应证和听力测试。结果:在743例CI患者队列中,35例患者(5%)接受了种植体翻修。共16例(2%)患者行外植体未同侧再植入术(平均年龄51岁[SD, 23]), 19例(3%)患者行外植体后再植入术(平均年龄51岁[SD, 18])。植入和取出CI的平均时间为56个月(SD, 72)。6例(16例中的6例[37.5%])是由于感染并发症引起的:2例(13%)由于严重危及生命的合并症而没有进行再植入术,1例(6%)同时进行了对侧植入术,1例(6%)经历了保险障碍而无法再植入术,2例(13%)失去了随访。10例患者(16例中的10例[62.5%])因非感染性指征切除了设备,包括6例(38%)因CI引起的非听力学症状,3例(19%)需要重复mri检查并希望避免围成像程序,1例(6%)因耳蜗骨化导致听力学结果不佳。未再次植入的患者在AzBio上的表现更差(35%对59%;p = 0.10)和CNC测试(27%对。70%;P = 0.02)。结论:患者接受外植体的原因多种多样,超过一半的病例的动机是症状不明确。这些愿望加上术后听力测试表现不佳,这可能会阻碍患者进行再次植入的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Patient Motivation Behind Device Removal in Cochlear Implant Patients.

Objective: To assess indications behind cochlear implant (CI) removal without subsequent re-implantation.

Patients: Patients who underwent CI explantation between January 2013 and December 2022.

Interventions: Explantation of CI device without ipsilateral re-implantation.

Main outcome measures: Indications for and audiometric testing before CI explantation.

Results: Within a cohort of 743 CI patients, 35 patients (5%) underwent implant revision. A total of 16 patients (2%) underwent explantation without ipsilateral re-implantation (mean age of 51 yr [SD, 23]), and 19 (3%) underwent explantation followed by re-implantation (mean age of 51 yr [SD, 18]). The average time between CI insertion and removal was 56 months (SD, 72). Six explantations (6 of 16 [37.5%]) were due to infectious complications: 2 (13%) did not undergo re-implantation given severe life-threatening comorbidities, 1 (6%) underwent simultaneous contralateral implantation, 1 (6%) experienced insurance barriers preventing re-implantation, and 2 (13%) were lost to follow-up. Ten patients (10 of 16 [62.5%]) underwent device removal for noninfectious indications, including 6 (38%) with non-audiologic symptoms attributed to CI, 3 (19%) who required repeated MRIs and desired avoidance of peri-imaging procedures, and 1 (6%) who had poor audiometric outcomes due to cochlear ossification. Patients who were not re-implanted performed worse on AzBio (35% versus 59%; p = 0.10) and CNC testing (27% versus. 70%; p = 0.02) after initial successful implantation compared with those who did undergo re-implantation.

Conclusions: Patients undergo explantation for a variety of reasons, with ill-defined symptoms being the motive in over half of the cases. These desires are compounded by poor postoperative audiometric performance, which likely hinders the patient's desire to undergo re-implantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信