埃塞俄比亚儿童以家庭为基础与以设施为基础的结核病预防治疗(CHIP-TB)的成本和成本效益

PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004466
Akash Malhotra, Ahmed Bedru, Fiseha Mulatu, Bareng A S Nonyane, Silvia Cohn, Christiaan Mulder, Samuel Bayu, Stephanie Borsboom, Gidea Conradie, Jonathan E Golub, Richard E Chaisson, Gavin Churchyard, David W Dowdy, Hojoon Sohn, Nicole Salazar-Austin
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚儿童以家庭为基础与以设施为基础的结核病预防治疗(CHIP-TB)的成本和成本效益","authors":"Akash Malhotra, Ahmed Bedru, Fiseha Mulatu, Bareng A S Nonyane, Silvia Cohn, Christiaan Mulder, Samuel Bayu, Stephanie Borsboom, Gidea Conradie, Jonathan E Golub, Richard E Chaisson, Gavin Churchyard, David W Dowdy, Hojoon Sohn, Nicole Salazar-Austin","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) is an essential intervention recommended for all child contacts in Ethiopia under 15 years who are at risk of tuberculosis (TB) infection. We conducted a cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of home-based versus facility-based TPT provision for child contacts in Ethiopia. As part of the CHIP TB trial, a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial conducted at eighteen clinics in Ethiopia, clinics were randomized to either a home-based model (intervention arm), administered by community health workers, or a facility-based model (standard of care) for managing child contacts. Cost data were collected from both a health service perspective and a household perspective, capturing all costs relevant to TPT. Costs were evaluated on a per-household basis, with the primary outcome being the difference in median costs per household initiating TPT. A secondary outcome assessed the cost-effectiveness as the incremental cost per additional child contact starting TPT. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted to examine the robustness of findings. At an average cost of US$18.92 per household managed, Home-based contact management, including TPT delivery was cost-saving compared to facility-based TPT delivery (US$27.24 per household managed) assessed based on the partial-societal perspectives, largely due to reductions in household out-of-pocket costs. The home-based strategy was both less costly and had increased TPT initiation in 61.5% of the scenarios assessed in the PSA. Home-based contact management is a cost-saving alternative for households and provides comparable initiation rates to facility-based care, making it a feasible approach to improve TB preventive treatment accessibility. Although it does not entirely replace facility-based care, a hybrid model that respects household preferences and allows flexibility in delivery could enhance TB care access for socio-economically disadvantaged households, potentially reducing health inequities. The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT04369326 on April 30, 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04369326.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 4","pages":"e0004466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost and cost-effectiveness of pediatric home-based versus facility-based TB Preventive Treatment in Ethiopia (CHIP-TB).\",\"authors\":\"Akash Malhotra, Ahmed Bedru, Fiseha Mulatu, Bareng A S Nonyane, Silvia Cohn, Christiaan Mulder, Samuel Bayu, Stephanie Borsboom, Gidea Conradie, Jonathan E Golub, Richard E Chaisson, Gavin Churchyard, David W Dowdy, Hojoon Sohn, Nicole Salazar-Austin\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) is an essential intervention recommended for all child contacts in Ethiopia under 15 years who are at risk of tuberculosis (TB) infection. We conducted a cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of home-based versus facility-based TPT provision for child contacts in Ethiopia. As part of the CHIP TB trial, a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial conducted at eighteen clinics in Ethiopia, clinics were randomized to either a home-based model (intervention arm), administered by community health workers, or a facility-based model (standard of care) for managing child contacts. Cost data were collected from both a health service perspective and a household perspective, capturing all costs relevant to TPT. Costs were evaluated on a per-household basis, with the primary outcome being the difference in median costs per household initiating TPT. A secondary outcome assessed the cost-effectiveness as the incremental cost per additional child contact starting TPT. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted to examine the robustness of findings. At an average cost of US$18.92 per household managed, Home-based contact management, including TPT delivery was cost-saving compared to facility-based TPT delivery (US$27.24 per household managed) assessed based on the partial-societal perspectives, largely due to reductions in household out-of-pocket costs. The home-based strategy was both less costly and had increased TPT initiation in 61.5% of the scenarios assessed in the PSA. Home-based contact management is a cost-saving alternative for households and provides comparable initiation rates to facility-based care, making it a feasible approach to improve TB preventive treatment accessibility. Although it does not entirely replace facility-based care, a hybrid model that respects household preferences and allows flexibility in delivery could enhance TB care access for socio-economically disadvantaged households, potentially reducing health inequities. The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT04369326 on April 30, 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04369326.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"e0004466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结核病预防治疗(TPT)是建议对埃塞俄比亚所有15岁以下有结核病感染风险的儿童接触者采取的基本干预措施。我们对埃塞俄比亚以家庭为基础与以设施为基础的儿童接触者TPT提供进行了成本和成本效益分析。CHIP结核病试验是在埃塞俄比亚18家诊所进行的一项实用的集群随机试验,作为该试验的一部分,诊所被随机分配到由社区卫生工作者管理的以家庭为基础的模式(干预组)或以设施为基础的模式(护理标准)来管理儿童接触者。从卫生服务角度和家庭角度收集成本数据,包括与TPT相关的所有成本。成本以每户为基础进行评估,主要结果是每户启动TPT的中位数成本差异。第二个结果评估了成本效益,即开始TPT的每个额外儿童接触的增量成本。进行概率敏感性分析(PSA)来检验结果的稳健性。根据部分社会观点评估,以家庭为基础的接触管理,包括提供TPT的平均成本为每个管理家庭18.92美元,与以设施为基础的TPT提供(每个管理家庭27.24美元)相比,节省了成本,这主要是由于家庭自付费用的减少。在PSA评估的61.5%的情况下,以家庭为基础的策略既成本较低,又增加了TPT的启动。对家庭来说,家庭接触管理是一种节省成本的替代方法,并且提供与基于设施的护理相当的启动率,使其成为改善结核病预防治疗可及性的可行方法。虽然它不能完全取代以设施为基础的护理,但一种尊重家庭偏好并允许灵活提供服务的混合模式可以增加社会经济上处于不利地位的家庭获得结核病护理的机会,从而有可能减少卫生不公平现象。该试验于2020年4月30日在clinicaltrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT04369326。https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04369326。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost and cost-effectiveness of pediatric home-based versus facility-based TB Preventive Treatment in Ethiopia (CHIP-TB).

Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) is an essential intervention recommended for all child contacts in Ethiopia under 15 years who are at risk of tuberculosis (TB) infection. We conducted a cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of home-based versus facility-based TPT provision for child contacts in Ethiopia. As part of the CHIP TB trial, a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial conducted at eighteen clinics in Ethiopia, clinics were randomized to either a home-based model (intervention arm), administered by community health workers, or a facility-based model (standard of care) for managing child contacts. Cost data were collected from both a health service perspective and a household perspective, capturing all costs relevant to TPT. Costs were evaluated on a per-household basis, with the primary outcome being the difference in median costs per household initiating TPT. A secondary outcome assessed the cost-effectiveness as the incremental cost per additional child contact starting TPT. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted to examine the robustness of findings. At an average cost of US$18.92 per household managed, Home-based contact management, including TPT delivery was cost-saving compared to facility-based TPT delivery (US$27.24 per household managed) assessed based on the partial-societal perspectives, largely due to reductions in household out-of-pocket costs. The home-based strategy was both less costly and had increased TPT initiation in 61.5% of the scenarios assessed in the PSA. Home-based contact management is a cost-saving alternative for households and provides comparable initiation rates to facility-based care, making it a feasible approach to improve TB preventive treatment accessibility. Although it does not entirely replace facility-based care, a hybrid model that respects household preferences and allows flexibility in delivery could enhance TB care access for socio-economically disadvantaged households, potentially reducing health inequities. The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT04369326 on April 30, 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04369326.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信