甲状腺癌临床试验多样性评价:临床多样性评价框架的应用

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Ethan Wood, Ryan Sherry, Garrett Jones, J Tyler Babek, Haley Howard, Christian Hemmerich, Alexandra Koontz, Jean-Maria Langley, Alicia Ito Ford, Matt Vassar
{"title":"甲状腺癌临床试验多样性评价:临床多样性评价框架的应用","authors":"Ethan Wood, Ryan Sherry, Garrett Jones, J Tyler Babek, Haley Howard, Christian Hemmerich, Alexandra Koontz, Jean-Maria Langley, Alicia Ito Ford, Matt Vassar","doi":"10.1002/hed.28173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite progress in recruiting representative patient samples for clinical trials, disparities persist. This study quantifies the representation of historically marginalized groups-female patients, members of racial/ethnic minority groups, and older patients-in thyroid cancer clinical trials and proposes strategies for improving their participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of thyroid cancer treatment studies conducted in the United States and published between January 2018 and December 2023, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were sourced from EMBASE and PubMed. Independent and duplicate screening and data extraction were conducted to ensure accuracy. Extracted data included trial interventions, clinical phases, sample sizes, demographic characteristics of participants, and funding sources. Studies were evaluated using the Clinical Trial Diversity Rating framework to assess the inclusion rates of diverse participant groups compared to their prevalence rates for thyroid cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that US-based clinical trials for thyroid cancer frequently underrepresented female and non-white individuals. In over half of studies, male participants outnumbered female participants. Reporting of race and ethnicity information was inadequate, with 9/13 studies failing to provide any demographic breakdown. Among the four studies that did report race and ethnicity data, none achieved adequate representation of minority patients. Additionally, there was a notable lack of reporting on participant age bands, despite the relatively high incidence of thyroid cancer in adults aged 60 and above.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the persistent underrepresentation of women, non-white racial/ethnic groups, and older adults in thyroid cancer trials. Urgent efforts are needed to address these disparities, particularly given the increasing rates of thyroid cancer among women and the healthcare access disparities in marginalized communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Diversity in Thyroid Cancer Clinical Trials: Application of the Clinical Diversity Rating Framework.\",\"authors\":\"Ethan Wood, Ryan Sherry, Garrett Jones, J Tyler Babek, Haley Howard, Christian Hemmerich, Alexandra Koontz, Jean-Maria Langley, Alicia Ito Ford, Matt Vassar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hed.28173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite progress in recruiting representative patient samples for clinical trials, disparities persist. This study quantifies the representation of historically marginalized groups-female patients, members of racial/ethnic minority groups, and older patients-in thyroid cancer clinical trials and proposes strategies for improving their participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of thyroid cancer treatment studies conducted in the United States and published between January 2018 and December 2023, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were sourced from EMBASE and PubMed. Independent and duplicate screening and data extraction were conducted to ensure accuracy. Extracted data included trial interventions, clinical phases, sample sizes, demographic characteristics of participants, and funding sources. Studies were evaluated using the Clinical Trial Diversity Rating framework to assess the inclusion rates of diverse participant groups compared to their prevalence rates for thyroid cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that US-based clinical trials for thyroid cancer frequently underrepresented female and non-white individuals. In over half of studies, male participants outnumbered female participants. Reporting of race and ethnicity information was inadequate, with 9/13 studies failing to provide any demographic breakdown. Among the four studies that did report race and ethnicity data, none achieved adequate representation of minority patients. Additionally, there was a notable lack of reporting on participant age bands, despite the relatively high incidence of thyroid cancer in adults aged 60 and above.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the persistent underrepresentation of women, non-white racial/ethnic groups, and older adults in thyroid cancer trials. Urgent efforts are needed to address these disparities, particularly given the increasing rates of thyroid cancer among women and the healthcare access disparities in marginalized communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.28173\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.28173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管在招募具有代表性的患者样本进行临床试验方面取得了进展,但差异仍然存在。本研究量化了历史上边缘化群体——女性患者、少数种族/民族群体成员和老年患者——在甲状腺癌临床试验中的代表性,并提出了提高他们参与度的策略。方法:我们对2018年1月至2023年12月期间在美国进行并发表的甲状腺癌治疗研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,遵循系统回顾和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。研究来源于EMBASE和PubMed。进行独立和重复筛选和数据提取以确保准确性。提取的数据包括试验干预、临床阶段、样本量、参与者的人口统计学特征和资金来源。使用临床试验多样性评分框架对研究进行评估,以评估不同参与者群体的纳入率,并将其与甲状腺癌患病率进行比较。结果:我们发现美国甲状腺癌临床试验中女性和非白人个体的代表性不足。在超过一半的研究中,男性参与者的数量超过了女性参与者。种族和族裔信息的报告不充分,9/13研究未能提供任何人口分类。在报告种族和民族数据的四项研究中,没有一项能够充分代表少数民族患者。此外,尽管甲状腺癌在60岁及以上的成年人中发病率相对较高,但明显缺乏对参与者年龄段的报道。结论:我们的研究结果强调了女性、非白人种族/民族群体和老年人在甲状腺癌试验中的持续代表性不足。需要紧急努力解决这些差距,特别是考虑到妇女甲状腺癌发病率不断上升以及边缘化社区获得保健服务的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Diversity in Thyroid Cancer Clinical Trials: Application of the Clinical Diversity Rating Framework.

Background: Despite progress in recruiting representative patient samples for clinical trials, disparities persist. This study quantifies the representation of historically marginalized groups-female patients, members of racial/ethnic minority groups, and older patients-in thyroid cancer clinical trials and proposes strategies for improving their participation.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of thyroid cancer treatment studies conducted in the United States and published between January 2018 and December 2023, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were sourced from EMBASE and PubMed. Independent and duplicate screening and data extraction were conducted to ensure accuracy. Extracted data included trial interventions, clinical phases, sample sizes, demographic characteristics of participants, and funding sources. Studies were evaluated using the Clinical Trial Diversity Rating framework to assess the inclusion rates of diverse participant groups compared to their prevalence rates for thyroid cancer.

Results: We found that US-based clinical trials for thyroid cancer frequently underrepresented female and non-white individuals. In over half of studies, male participants outnumbered female participants. Reporting of race and ethnicity information was inadequate, with 9/13 studies failing to provide any demographic breakdown. Among the four studies that did report race and ethnicity data, none achieved adequate representation of minority patients. Additionally, there was a notable lack of reporting on participant age bands, despite the relatively high incidence of thyroid cancer in adults aged 60 and above.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the persistent underrepresentation of women, non-white racial/ethnic groups, and older adults in thyroid cancer trials. Urgent efforts are needed to address these disparities, particularly given the increasing rates of thyroid cancer among women and the healthcare access disparities in marginalized communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
278
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信