经动脉栓塞治疗晚期胰腺切除术后出血的疗效:氰基丙烯酸酯正丁酯与混合栓塞剂与单独混合栓塞剂的比较

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of Investigative Surgery Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1080/08941939.2025.2488133
Heng Zhang, Feng Duan, Jin Xin Fu, Jin Long Zhang, Bing Yuan, Yan Wang, Jie Yu Yan, Li Min Meng, Liang Li, Mao Qiang Wang
{"title":"经动脉栓塞治疗晚期胰腺切除术后出血的疗效:氰基丙烯酸酯正丁酯与混合栓塞剂与单独混合栓塞剂的比较","authors":"Heng Zhang, Feng Duan, Jin Xin Fu, Jin Long Zhang, Bing Yuan, Yan Wang, Jie Yu Yan, Li Min Meng, Liang Li, Mao Qiang Wang","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2025.2488133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to retrospectively compare the efficacy of transarterial embolization (TAE) with N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) and conventional agents (microcoils, polyvinyl alcohol [PVA], or gelatin sponge) in the treatment of patients with late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (late-PPH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From June 2012 to June 2022, this retrospective study enrolled 130 consecutive patients who underwent TAE treatment due to late-PPH at one institution. Of these patients, 56 were treated with NBCA-mixed conventional agents (NBCA-MA group), and 74 were treated with mixed conventional agents alone (MA group). The patients' clinical characteristics and TAE details were gathered. The clinical outcomes in the two groups were compared. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, prognostic factors were evaluated for clinical success and 30-day mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical success in the NBCA-MA group was 80.4% higher than that in the MA group (60.8%). Rebleeding was significantly more common in the MA group (29.7% vs. 8.9%). The 30-day mortality rate of the NBCA-MA group was lower than that of the MA group (16.1% vs. 33.8%). NBCA use was a significant prognostic factor associated with clinical success, while age and NBCA use were significant factors associated with the 30-day mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, we found that TAE with NBCA is a safe and effective method for treating late-PPH.</p>","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":"38 1","pages":"2488133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Outcomes in Transarterial Embolization for Late Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage: A Comparison of N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate with Mixed Embolic Agents Versus Mixed Embolic Agents Alone.\",\"authors\":\"Heng Zhang, Feng Duan, Jin Xin Fu, Jin Long Zhang, Bing Yuan, Yan Wang, Jie Yu Yan, Li Min Meng, Liang Li, Mao Qiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08941939.2025.2488133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to retrospectively compare the efficacy of transarterial embolization (TAE) with N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) and conventional agents (microcoils, polyvinyl alcohol [PVA], or gelatin sponge) in the treatment of patients with late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (late-PPH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From June 2012 to June 2022, this retrospective study enrolled 130 consecutive patients who underwent TAE treatment due to late-PPH at one institution. Of these patients, 56 were treated with NBCA-mixed conventional agents (NBCA-MA group), and 74 were treated with mixed conventional agents alone (MA group). The patients' clinical characteristics and TAE details were gathered. The clinical outcomes in the two groups were compared. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, prognostic factors were evaluated for clinical success and 30-day mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical success in the NBCA-MA group was 80.4% higher than that in the MA group (60.8%). Rebleeding was significantly more common in the MA group (29.7% vs. 8.9%). The 30-day mortality rate of the NBCA-MA group was lower than that of the MA group (16.1% vs. 33.8%). NBCA use was a significant prognostic factor associated with clinical success, while age and NBCA use were significant factors associated with the 30-day mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, we found that TAE with NBCA is a safe and effective method for treating late-PPH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative Surgery\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"2488133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2025.2488133\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2025.2488133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在回顾性比较经动脉栓塞(TAE)与传统药物(微圈、聚乙烯醇[PVA]或明胶海绵)治疗晚期胰腺切除术后出血(late- pph)患者的疗效。方法:2012年6月至2022年6月,本回顾性研究在一家机构连续招募130例因pph晚期接受TAE治疗的患者。其中56例采用nbca混合常规药物治疗(NBCA-MA组),74例采用单独混合常规药物治疗(MA组)。收集患者的临床特征和TAE细节。比较两组患者的临床结果。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析,评估临床成功和30天死亡率的预后因素。结果:NBCA-MA组临床成功率比MA组(60.8%)高80.4%。再出血在MA组中更为常见(29.7%比8.9%)。NBCA-MA组30天死亡率低于MA组(16.1%比33.8%)。NBCA使用是与临床成功相关的重要预后因素,而年龄和NBCA使用是与30天死亡率相关的重要因素。结论:结论:TAE联合NBCA治疗晚期pph是一种安全有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Outcomes in Transarterial Embolization for Late Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage: A Comparison of N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate with Mixed Embolic Agents Versus Mixed Embolic Agents Alone.

Background: This study aimed to retrospectively compare the efficacy of transarterial embolization (TAE) with N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) and conventional agents (microcoils, polyvinyl alcohol [PVA], or gelatin sponge) in the treatment of patients with late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (late-PPH).

Methods: From June 2012 to June 2022, this retrospective study enrolled 130 consecutive patients who underwent TAE treatment due to late-PPH at one institution. Of these patients, 56 were treated with NBCA-mixed conventional agents (NBCA-MA group), and 74 were treated with mixed conventional agents alone (MA group). The patients' clinical characteristics and TAE details were gathered. The clinical outcomes in the two groups were compared. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, prognostic factors were evaluated for clinical success and 30-day mortality rates.

Results: The clinical success in the NBCA-MA group was 80.4% higher than that in the MA group (60.8%). Rebleeding was significantly more common in the MA group (29.7% vs. 8.9%). The 30-day mortality rate of the NBCA-MA group was lower than that of the MA group (16.1% vs. 33.8%). NBCA use was a significant prognostic factor associated with clinical success, while age and NBCA use were significant factors associated with the 30-day mortality rate.

Conclusion: In conclusion, we found that TAE with NBCA is a safe and effective method for treating late-PPH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信