流行病学研究中轮班工作的回顾性评估。经验教训。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sylvia Rabstein, Beate Pesch, Lewin Eisele, Anja Marr, Susanne Moebus, Raimund Erbel, Börge Schmidt, Nico Dragano, Thomas Brüning, Thomas Behrens, Karl-Heinz Jöckel
{"title":"流行病学研究中轮班工作的回顾性评估。经验教训。","authors":"Sylvia Rabstein, Beate Pesch, Lewin Eisele, Anja Marr, Susanne Moebus, Raimund Erbel, Börge Schmidt, Nico Dragano, Thomas Brüning, Thomas Behrens, Karl-Heinz Jöckel","doi":"10.1080/15459624.2025.2485089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reliable assessment of characteristics of shift-work exposure remains a critical methodological issue in epidemiological studies. A working group of the International Agency for Research on Cancer developed recommendations for the assessment of shift-work. These were translated into a detailed interview for the 10-year follow-up of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall (HNR) cohort. This study investigated the agreement of shift-work characteristics between three different assessments that were administered in interviews at two time points. At the study baseline (2000-2003), 4,814 participants were enrolled, and brief shift-work information was collected for 2,121 working participants (1,244 men and 877 women aged 45-75 years). Of 2,613 cohort members in the prospective 10-year follow-up between 2011 and 2013, 2,444 (also non-working) individuals participated in detailed shift-work interviews that consisted of (a) key summary questions and (b) period-based shift-work histories. participants' shift-work exposures up to the study baseline were compared in 1,217 subjects who were interviewed during both the baseline and the follow-up. Within the follow-up, participant responses to key summary questions were compared with calculated parameters from period-based histories. Agreement was measured by simple agreement (%), Gwet's agreement coefficient 1 (Gwet's AC1), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Beta-regression models were applied to investigate potential associations between age and sex with the reliability of shift-work characteristics. A high level of agreement was found between ever having worked shift-work (ever shift-work) and duration that each participant worked shift-work (duration of shift-work) reported during baseline and at follow-up (ever shift-work until study baseline in men: Gwet's AC1 = 0.77 (CI 0.72-0.82)). When comparing key summary questions and detailed shift-work histories, the duration of shift-work showed a high level of reliability that marginally decreased with age (in women ICC = 0.96 (CI 0.95-0.97), linear effect of age groups on <i>µ</i>: <i>p</i> = 0.08). Participants had problems remembering more detailed shift-work information. Ever shift-work and duration of shift-work can be assessed with key summary questions but reliability slightly decreases with age.</p>","PeriodicalId":16599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective assessment of shift-work in epidemiological studies - Lessons learned.\",\"authors\":\"Sylvia Rabstein, Beate Pesch, Lewin Eisele, Anja Marr, Susanne Moebus, Raimund Erbel, Börge Schmidt, Nico Dragano, Thomas Brüning, Thomas Behrens, Karl-Heinz Jöckel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15459624.2025.2485089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The reliable assessment of characteristics of shift-work exposure remains a critical methodological issue in epidemiological studies. A working group of the International Agency for Research on Cancer developed recommendations for the assessment of shift-work. These were translated into a detailed interview for the 10-year follow-up of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall (HNR) cohort. This study investigated the agreement of shift-work characteristics between three different assessments that were administered in interviews at two time points. At the study baseline (2000-2003), 4,814 participants were enrolled, and brief shift-work information was collected for 2,121 working participants (1,244 men and 877 women aged 45-75 years). Of 2,613 cohort members in the prospective 10-year follow-up between 2011 and 2013, 2,444 (also non-working) individuals participated in detailed shift-work interviews that consisted of (a) key summary questions and (b) period-based shift-work histories. participants' shift-work exposures up to the study baseline were compared in 1,217 subjects who were interviewed during both the baseline and the follow-up. Within the follow-up, participant responses to key summary questions were compared with calculated parameters from period-based histories. Agreement was measured by simple agreement (%), Gwet's agreement coefficient 1 (Gwet's AC1), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Beta-regression models were applied to investigate potential associations between age and sex with the reliability of shift-work characteristics. A high level of agreement was found between ever having worked shift-work (ever shift-work) and duration that each participant worked shift-work (duration of shift-work) reported during baseline and at follow-up (ever shift-work until study baseline in men: Gwet's AC1 = 0.77 (CI 0.72-0.82)). When comparing key summary questions and detailed shift-work histories, the duration of shift-work showed a high level of reliability that marginally decreased with age (in women ICC = 0.96 (CI 0.95-0.97), linear effect of age groups on <i>µ</i>: <i>p</i> = 0.08). Participants had problems remembering more detailed shift-work information. Ever shift-work and duration of shift-work can be assessed with key summary questions but reliability slightly decreases with age.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2025.2485089\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2025.2485089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在流行病学研究中,轮班工作暴露特征的可靠评估仍然是一个关键的方法学问题。国际癌症研究机构的一个工作组提出了评估轮班工作的建议。这些结果被转化为Heinz Nixdorf Recall (HNR)队列10年随访的详细访谈。本研究调查了在两个时间点进行访谈的三种不同评估之间轮班工作特征的一致性。在研究基线(2000-2003年),4814名参与者被招募,并收集了2121名工作参与者的简短轮班工作信息(1244名男性和877名女性,年龄在45-75岁之间)。在2011年至2013年的10年随访中,2613名队列成员中,2444名(也是非工作的)个人参加了详细的轮班工作访谈,包括(a)关键总结问题和(b)基于时间段的轮班工作历史。研究人员将1217名在基线和随访期间接受采访的参与者的轮班工作暴露情况与研究基线进行了比较。在随访中,参与者对关键摘要问题的回答与基于时期的历史计算参数进行比较。一致性通过简单一致性(%)、Gwet的一致性系数1 (Gwet的AC1)和95%置信区间(CI)的类内相关系数(ICC)来衡量。采用beta回归模型来研究年龄和性别与轮班工作特征可靠性之间的潜在关联。在基线和随访期间(男性受试者在研究基线前曾轮班工作:Gwet的AC1 = 0.77 (CI 0.72-0.82)),发现曾经轮班工作(曾经轮班工作)和每个参与者轮班工作的持续时间(轮班工作的持续时间)之间存在高度一致性。当比较关键的总结问题和详细的轮班工作历史时,轮班工作的持续时间显示出高水平的可靠性,随着年龄的增长而略有下降(女性ICC = 0.96 (CI 0.95-0.97),年龄组对µ的线性影响:p = 0.08)。参与者很难记住更详细的轮班工作信息。每次轮班工作和轮班工作的持续时间可以用关键的总结问题来评估,但可靠性随着年龄的增长而略有下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective assessment of shift-work in epidemiological studies - Lessons learned.

The reliable assessment of characteristics of shift-work exposure remains a critical methodological issue in epidemiological studies. A working group of the International Agency for Research on Cancer developed recommendations for the assessment of shift-work. These were translated into a detailed interview for the 10-year follow-up of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall (HNR) cohort. This study investigated the agreement of shift-work characteristics between three different assessments that were administered in interviews at two time points. At the study baseline (2000-2003), 4,814 participants were enrolled, and brief shift-work information was collected for 2,121 working participants (1,244 men and 877 women aged 45-75 years). Of 2,613 cohort members in the prospective 10-year follow-up between 2011 and 2013, 2,444 (also non-working) individuals participated in detailed shift-work interviews that consisted of (a) key summary questions and (b) period-based shift-work histories. participants' shift-work exposures up to the study baseline were compared in 1,217 subjects who were interviewed during both the baseline and the follow-up. Within the follow-up, participant responses to key summary questions were compared with calculated parameters from period-based histories. Agreement was measured by simple agreement (%), Gwet's agreement coefficient 1 (Gwet's AC1), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Beta-regression models were applied to investigate potential associations between age and sex with the reliability of shift-work characteristics. A high level of agreement was found between ever having worked shift-work (ever shift-work) and duration that each participant worked shift-work (duration of shift-work) reported during baseline and at follow-up (ever shift-work until study baseline in men: Gwet's AC1 = 0.77 (CI 0.72-0.82)). When comparing key summary questions and detailed shift-work histories, the duration of shift-work showed a high level of reliability that marginally decreased with age (in women ICC = 0.96 (CI 0.95-0.97), linear effect of age groups on µ: p = 0.08). Participants had problems remembering more detailed shift-work information. Ever shift-work and duration of shift-work can be assessed with key summary questions but reliability slightly decreases with age.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene ( JOEH ) is a joint publication of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA®) and ACGIH®. The JOEH is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to enhancing the knowledge and practice of occupational and environmental hygiene and safety by widely disseminating research articles and applied studies of the highest quality. The JOEH provides a written medium for the communication of ideas, methods, processes, and research in core and emerging areas of occupational and environmental hygiene. Core domains include, but are not limited to: exposure assessment, control strategies, ergonomics, and risk analysis. Emerging domains include, but are not limited to: sensor technology, emergency preparedness and response, changing workforce, and management and analysis of "big" data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信