关中平原农田土壤剖面重金属空间分布、影响因素、风险评价及来源分析[j]。

Q2 Environmental Science
Shu Zhu, Shu-Yi Li, Yang Yu, Yuan-Jun Zhu, Jiang-Bo Qiao, Ming-An Shao
{"title":"关中平原农田土壤剖面重金属空间分布、影响因素、风险评价及来源分析[j]。","authors":"Shu Zhu, Shu-Yi Li, Yang Yu, Yuan-Jun Zhu, Jiang-Bo Qiao, Ming-An Shao","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202403016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to understand the spatial distribution, influencing factors, ecological risk characteristics, and sources of heavy metals in the soil profile (0-1 m) of farmland in the Guanzhong Plain, soil samples of 0-1 m were collected from 124 sites in the Guanzhong Plain. The contents of heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn) in soil were analyzed at different depths (0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, 20-40 cm, 40-60 cm, and 60-100 cm). The study generated the spatial distribution characteristics of soil heavy metals based on geostatistics and investigated the influencing factors of heavy metals based on structural equation modeling (SEM). In addition, the ecological environmental risks of soil heavy metals were evaluated using the methods of index of geo-accumulation (<i>I</i><sub>geo</sub>), single factor contaminant index (<i>P<sub>i</sub></i>), and potential ecological risk index (<i>E<sub>i</sub></i>). Finally, the sources of soil heavy metals were analyzed using the PMF model. The results showed that the average heavy metal content of <i>ω</i>(As), <i>ω</i>(Cd), <i>ω</i>(Cr), <i>ω</i>(Cu), <i>ω</i>(Ni), <i>ω</i>(Pb), and <i>ω</i>(Zn) in the 0-10 cm were 19.57, 0.71, 69.65, 21.91, 28.67, 17.54, and 73.77 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. The average values of As, Cd, Cr, Pb, and Zn exceeded the background values. With the increasing soil depth, all heavy metals showed a decreasing trend except for Cd and Ni. The spatial distribution indicated that different heavy metals in the same soil layer had different spatial distributions, and the spatial distribution of heavy metals also varied at different depths. The structural equation model showed that the factors affecting the distribution of heavy metals at different depths were deeply dependent. The ecological risk assessment showed that Cd at different depths had higher ecological risks, while the rest were considered minor risks. The sources of 0-40 cm soil layer were consistent, and the main sources were pesticides and herbicides, organic fertilizers and fertilizers, natural sources, and traffic-induced atmospheric subsidence and industrial sources; the sources of 40-100 cm were consistent, and the main sources were pesticides and herbicides, organic fertilizers and fertilizers, natural sources, and traffic-induced atmospheric subsidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 4","pages":"2501-2511"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Spatial Distribution, Influencing Factors, Risk Assessment, and Source Analysis of Heavy Metals in Soil Profile of Farmland in the Guanzhong Plain].\",\"authors\":\"Shu Zhu, Shu-Yi Li, Yang Yu, Yuan-Jun Zhu, Jiang-Bo Qiao, Ming-An Shao\",\"doi\":\"10.13227/j.hjkx.202403016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In order to understand the spatial distribution, influencing factors, ecological risk characteristics, and sources of heavy metals in the soil profile (0-1 m) of farmland in the Guanzhong Plain, soil samples of 0-1 m were collected from 124 sites in the Guanzhong Plain. The contents of heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn) in soil were analyzed at different depths (0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, 20-40 cm, 40-60 cm, and 60-100 cm). The study generated the spatial distribution characteristics of soil heavy metals based on geostatistics and investigated the influencing factors of heavy metals based on structural equation modeling (SEM). In addition, the ecological environmental risks of soil heavy metals were evaluated using the methods of index of geo-accumulation (<i>I</i><sub>geo</sub>), single factor contaminant index (<i>P<sub>i</sub></i>), and potential ecological risk index (<i>E<sub>i</sub></i>). Finally, the sources of soil heavy metals were analyzed using the PMF model. The results showed that the average heavy metal content of <i>ω</i>(As), <i>ω</i>(Cd), <i>ω</i>(Cr), <i>ω</i>(Cu), <i>ω</i>(Ni), <i>ω</i>(Pb), and <i>ω</i>(Zn) in the 0-10 cm were 19.57, 0.71, 69.65, 21.91, 28.67, 17.54, and 73.77 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. The average values of As, Cd, Cr, Pb, and Zn exceeded the background values. With the increasing soil depth, all heavy metals showed a decreasing trend except for Cd and Ni. The spatial distribution indicated that different heavy metals in the same soil layer had different spatial distributions, and the spatial distribution of heavy metals also varied at different depths. The structural equation model showed that the factors affecting the distribution of heavy metals at different depths were deeply dependent. The ecological risk assessment showed that Cd at different depths had higher ecological risks, while the rest were considered minor risks. The sources of 0-40 cm soil layer were consistent, and the main sources were pesticides and herbicides, organic fertilizers and fertilizers, natural sources, and traffic-induced atmospheric subsidence and industrial sources; the sources of 40-100 cm were consistent, and the main sources were pesticides and herbicides, organic fertilizers and fertilizers, natural sources, and traffic-induced atmospheric subsidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"2501-2511\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202403016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202403016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解关中平原农田0 ~ 1 m土壤剖面重金属的空间分布、影响因素、生态风险特征及来源,在关中平原124个样点采集了0 ~ 1 m土壤样品。研究了不同深度(0 ~ 10 cm、10 ~ 20 cm、20 ~ 40 cm、40 ~ 60 cm、60 ~ 100 cm)土壤中重金属As、Cd、Cr、Cu、Ni、Pb、Zn的含量。基于地质统计学方法生成土壤重金属的空间分布特征,并基于结构方程模型(SEM)研究土壤重金属的影响因素。此外,采用地累积指数(Igeo)、单因素污染物指数(Pi)和潜在生态风险指数(Ei)对土壤重金属的生态环境风险进行了评价。最后,利用PMF模型分析了土壤重金属的来源。结果表明:0 ~ 10 cm土壤中ω(As)、ω(Cd)、ω(Cr)、ω(Cu)、ω(Ni)、ω(Pb)和ω(Zn)的平均重金属含量分别为19.57、0.71、69.65、21.91、28.67、17.54和73.77 mg·kg-1。砷、镉、铬、铅、锌的平均值超过了背景值。随着土壤深度的增加,除Cd和Ni外,其余重金属含量均呈下降趋势。空间分布表明,同一土层中不同重金属具有不同的空间分布,重金属在不同深度的空间分布也存在差异。结构方程模型表明,影响重金属在不同深度分布的因素是密切相关的。生态风险评价结果表明,不同深度的镉具有较高的生态风险,其余为轻度风险。0 ~ 40 cm土层源一致,主要为农药除草剂、有机肥化肥、自然源、交通引起的大气沉降和工业源;40 ~ 100 cm土层源一致,主要为农药除草剂、有机肥化肥、自然源、交通引起的大气沉降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Spatial Distribution, Influencing Factors, Risk Assessment, and Source Analysis of Heavy Metals in Soil Profile of Farmland in the Guanzhong Plain].

In order to understand the spatial distribution, influencing factors, ecological risk characteristics, and sources of heavy metals in the soil profile (0-1 m) of farmland in the Guanzhong Plain, soil samples of 0-1 m were collected from 124 sites in the Guanzhong Plain. The contents of heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn) in soil were analyzed at different depths (0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, 20-40 cm, 40-60 cm, and 60-100 cm). The study generated the spatial distribution characteristics of soil heavy metals based on geostatistics and investigated the influencing factors of heavy metals based on structural equation modeling (SEM). In addition, the ecological environmental risks of soil heavy metals were evaluated using the methods of index of geo-accumulation (Igeo), single factor contaminant index (Pi), and potential ecological risk index (Ei). Finally, the sources of soil heavy metals were analyzed using the PMF model. The results showed that the average heavy metal content of ω(As), ω(Cd), ω(Cr), ω(Cu), ω(Ni), ω(Pb), and ω(Zn) in the 0-10 cm were 19.57, 0.71, 69.65, 21.91, 28.67, 17.54, and 73.77 mg·kg-1, respectively. The average values of As, Cd, Cr, Pb, and Zn exceeded the background values. With the increasing soil depth, all heavy metals showed a decreasing trend except for Cd and Ni. The spatial distribution indicated that different heavy metals in the same soil layer had different spatial distributions, and the spatial distribution of heavy metals also varied at different depths. The structural equation model showed that the factors affecting the distribution of heavy metals at different depths were deeply dependent. The ecological risk assessment showed that Cd at different depths had higher ecological risks, while the rest were considered minor risks. The sources of 0-40 cm soil layer were consistent, and the main sources were pesticides and herbicides, organic fertilizers and fertilizers, natural sources, and traffic-induced atmospheric subsidence and industrial sources; the sources of 40-100 cm were consistent, and the main sources were pesticides and herbicides, organic fertilizers and fertilizers, natural sources, and traffic-induced atmospheric subsidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信