经皮冠状动脉介入术后长期心血管事件的血小板功能检测比较

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Mingyao Zhou, Pan Hou, Ying Liang, Wenqi Tao, Zhifu Guo, Bili Zhang, Yang Lu, Guojun Chu, Pan Li
{"title":"经皮冠状动脉介入术后长期心血管事件的血小板功能检测比较","authors":"Mingyao Zhou, Pan Hou, Ying Liang, Wenqi Tao, Zhifu Guo, Bili Zhang, Yang Lu, Guojun Chu, Pan Li","doi":"10.1055/a-2570-4538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) face increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Although platelet function tests like thrombelastography (TEG), vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), PL-11, and VerifyNow have been described, the correlation between them and their prognostic implications remains uncertain. This prospective study aims to evaluate the consistency and effectiveness of four platelet function detection methods in predicting long-term MACEs in patients with ACS. All 98 ACS patients undergoing PCI with clopidogrel were assessed for HTPR using four platelet function detection methods. The endpoint was the occurrence of MACEs, including cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Among 98 patients enrolled from April 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014, 27 (27.6%) patients with VerifyNow-detected HTPR (P2Y12 reaction units [PRUs] >240). The incidence of HTPR was 58.2% for TEG, 52% for VASP, and 13.3% for PL-11. VerifyNow and TEG showed the highest consistency in detecting HTPR (kappa = 0.201, <i>p</i> = 0.015). During a median follow-up of 6.1 years, 29 MACEs occurred, including 24 TVRs, 3 cardiovascular deaths, and 2 nonfatal MIs. VerifyNow-detected HTPR independently predicted long-term MACEs (hazard ratio: 5.73, 95% confidence interval: 2.04-16.09, <i>p</i> = 0.001), even after adjusting for traditional risk factors (TRFs). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that the model incorporating TRFs and VerifyNow-detected HTPR had superior predictive discrimination for MACEs (area under ROC curve = 0.889). VerifyNow-detected HTPR independently emerges as a robust predictor for long-term MACEs, demonstrating superior predictive discrimination compared with other platelet function tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":21673,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Platelet Function Tests for Long-Term Cardiovascular Events after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Mingyao Zhou, Pan Hou, Ying Liang, Wenqi Tao, Zhifu Guo, Bili Zhang, Yang Lu, Guojun Chu, Pan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2570-4538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) face increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Although platelet function tests like thrombelastography (TEG), vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), PL-11, and VerifyNow have been described, the correlation between them and their prognostic implications remains uncertain. This prospective study aims to evaluate the consistency and effectiveness of four platelet function detection methods in predicting long-term MACEs in patients with ACS. All 98 ACS patients undergoing PCI with clopidogrel were assessed for HTPR using four platelet function detection methods. The endpoint was the occurrence of MACEs, including cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Among 98 patients enrolled from April 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014, 27 (27.6%) patients with VerifyNow-detected HTPR (P2Y12 reaction units [PRUs] >240). The incidence of HTPR was 58.2% for TEG, 52% for VASP, and 13.3% for PL-11. VerifyNow and TEG showed the highest consistency in detecting HTPR (kappa = 0.201, <i>p</i> = 0.015). During a median follow-up of 6.1 years, 29 MACEs occurred, including 24 TVRs, 3 cardiovascular deaths, and 2 nonfatal MIs. VerifyNow-detected HTPR independently predicted long-term MACEs (hazard ratio: 5.73, 95% confidence interval: 2.04-16.09, <i>p</i> = 0.001), even after adjusting for traditional risk factors (TRFs). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that the model incorporating TRFs and VerifyNow-detected HTPR had superior predictive discrimination for MACEs (area under ROC curve = 0.889). VerifyNow-detected HTPR independently emerges as a robust predictor for long-term MACEs, demonstrating superior predictive discrimination compared with other platelet function tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2570-4538\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2570-4538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时,血小板反应性(HTPR)高的患者发生主要不良心血管事件(mace)的风险增加。虽然血小板功能测试如血栓造影(TEG)、血管扩张剂刺激磷酸化蛋白(VASP)、PL-11和VerifyNow已经被描述过,但它们之间的相关性及其预后意义仍然不确定。本前瞻性研究旨在评估四种血小板功能检测方法预测ACS患者长期mace的一致性和有效性。采用四种血小板功能检测方法对98例接受氯吡格雷PCI治疗的ACS患者进行HTPR评估。终点是mace的发生,包括心源性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)和靶血管重建术(TVR)。在2014年4月1日至2014年6月30日入组的98例患者中,有27例(27.6%)患者在verifynow检测到HTPR (P2Y12反应单位[pru] bb0 240)。TEG的HTPR发生率为58.2%,VASP为52%,PL-11为13.3%。VerifyNow与TEG检测HTPR的一致性最高(kappa = 0.201, p = 0.015)。在中位随访6.1年期间,发生29例mace,包括24例tvr, 3例心血管死亡和2例非致死性mi。即使在调整传统风险因素(trf)后,verifynow检测到的HTPR也能独立预测长期mes(风险比:5.73,95%置信区间:2.04-16.09,p = 0.001)。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析表明,合并TRFs和verifynow检测到的HTPR的模型对mace具有较好的预测辨别能力(ROC曲线下面积= 0.889)。与其他血小板功能测试相比,verifynow检测到的HTPR可以作为长期mace的可靠预测指标,具有更好的预测辨别能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Platelet Function Tests for Long-Term Cardiovascular Events after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) face increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Although platelet function tests like thrombelastography (TEG), vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), PL-11, and VerifyNow have been described, the correlation between them and their prognostic implications remains uncertain. This prospective study aims to evaluate the consistency and effectiveness of four platelet function detection methods in predicting long-term MACEs in patients with ACS. All 98 ACS patients undergoing PCI with clopidogrel were assessed for HTPR using four platelet function detection methods. The endpoint was the occurrence of MACEs, including cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Among 98 patients enrolled from April 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014, 27 (27.6%) patients with VerifyNow-detected HTPR (P2Y12 reaction units [PRUs] >240). The incidence of HTPR was 58.2% for TEG, 52% for VASP, and 13.3% for PL-11. VerifyNow and TEG showed the highest consistency in detecting HTPR (kappa = 0.201, p = 0.015). During a median follow-up of 6.1 years, 29 MACEs occurred, including 24 TVRs, 3 cardiovascular deaths, and 2 nonfatal MIs. VerifyNow-detected HTPR independently predicted long-term MACEs (hazard ratio: 5.73, 95% confidence interval: 2.04-16.09, p = 0.001), even after adjusting for traditional risk factors (TRFs). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that the model incorporating TRFs and VerifyNow-detected HTPR had superior predictive discrimination for MACEs (area under ROC curve = 0.889). VerifyNow-detected HTPR independently emerges as a robust predictor for long-term MACEs, demonstrating superior predictive discrimination compared with other platelet function tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis
Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
21.10%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis is a topic driven review journal that focuses on all issues relating to hemostatic and thrombotic disorders. As one of the premiere review journals in the field, Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis serves as a comprehensive forum for important advances in clinical and laboratory diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. The journal also publishes peer reviewed original research papers. Seminars offers an informed perspective on today''s pivotal issues, including hemophilia A & B, thrombophilia, gene therapy, venous and arterial thrombosis, von Willebrand disease, vascular disorders and thromboembolic diseases. Attention is also given to the latest developments in pharmaceutical drugs along with treatment and current management techniques. The journal also frequently publishes sponsored supplements to further highlight emerging trends in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信