Dylan Johnson, Ian Colman, Katholiki Georgiades, Mark Wade
{"title":"在加拿大成年人的全国代表性样本中,早期生活逆境、流行病压力和社会支持对精神障碍的相互作用。","authors":"Dylan Johnson, Ian Colman, Katholiki Georgiades, Mark Wade","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02911-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined how pre-existing early-life adversity (ELA) and current social support interacted with COVID-specific pandemic stressors in relation to risk of psychiatric disorders in a nationally-representative sample of Canadian adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n = 9,409) were from the Mental Health and Access to Care Survey, a cross-sectional survey of Canadian adults during later stages of the COVID pandemic (March to July 2022). Measures included pandemic stressors (Statistics Canada), ELA (Childhood Experiences of Violence Questionnaire), social support (Social Provisions Scale), and past 12-month psychiatric problems (WHO-CIDI). Statistical analyses included two-step logistic regression models adjusted for covariates and weighted for complex survey design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher odds of psychiatric problems were predicted by ELA (aOR = 1.24 [1.15-1.35]-aOR = 1.53 [1.39-1.69] across psychiatric disorders) and pandemic stress (aOR = 1.18 [1.12-1.25]-aOR = 1.32 [1.26-1.39] across psychiatric disorders). Significant interactions between ELA and pandemic stress for depression (aOR = 0.96 [0.93-0.98]) suggested an attenuated effect of pandemic stress at higher levels of ELA. Social support was associated with reduced psychiatric problems (aOR = 0.88 [0.86-0.91]-aOR = 0.97 [0.94-0.99]), while pandemic stress was associated with increased psychiatric problems (aOR = 1.20 [1.15-1.26]-aOR = 1.33 [1.27-1.40]). An interaction between social support and pandemic stress for suicidality (aOR = 1.02 [1.01-1.03]) indicated that higher levels of social support were associated with increased odds of suicidality in the presence of pandemic stress, though the effect was small and of questionable clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ELA and pandemic stress increased psychiatric disorder likelihood, while social support was protective. However, interactions indicate nuanced relationships in mental health risk during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interactions between early-life adversity, pandemic stress, and social support on psychiatric disorders in a nationally representative sample of Canadian adults.\",\"authors\":\"Dylan Johnson, Ian Colman, Katholiki Georgiades, Mark Wade\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00127-025-02911-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined how pre-existing early-life adversity (ELA) and current social support interacted with COVID-specific pandemic stressors in relation to risk of psychiatric disorders in a nationally-representative sample of Canadian adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n = 9,409) were from the Mental Health and Access to Care Survey, a cross-sectional survey of Canadian adults during later stages of the COVID pandemic (March to July 2022). Measures included pandemic stressors (Statistics Canada), ELA (Childhood Experiences of Violence Questionnaire), social support (Social Provisions Scale), and past 12-month psychiatric problems (WHO-CIDI). Statistical analyses included two-step logistic regression models adjusted for covariates and weighted for complex survey design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher odds of psychiatric problems were predicted by ELA (aOR = 1.24 [1.15-1.35]-aOR = 1.53 [1.39-1.69] across psychiatric disorders) and pandemic stress (aOR = 1.18 [1.12-1.25]-aOR = 1.32 [1.26-1.39] across psychiatric disorders). Significant interactions between ELA and pandemic stress for depression (aOR = 0.96 [0.93-0.98]) suggested an attenuated effect of pandemic stress at higher levels of ELA. Social support was associated with reduced psychiatric problems (aOR = 0.88 [0.86-0.91]-aOR = 0.97 [0.94-0.99]), while pandemic stress was associated with increased psychiatric problems (aOR = 1.20 [1.15-1.26]-aOR = 1.33 [1.27-1.40]). An interaction between social support and pandemic stress for suicidality (aOR = 1.02 [1.01-1.03]) indicated that higher levels of social support were associated with increased odds of suicidality in the presence of pandemic stress, though the effect was small and of questionable clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ELA and pandemic stress increased psychiatric disorder likelihood, while social support was protective. However, interactions indicate nuanced relationships in mental health risk during the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02911-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02911-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interactions between early-life adversity, pandemic stress, and social support on psychiatric disorders in a nationally representative sample of Canadian adults.
Purpose: This study examined how pre-existing early-life adversity (ELA) and current social support interacted with COVID-specific pandemic stressors in relation to risk of psychiatric disorders in a nationally-representative sample of Canadian adults.
Methods: Participants (n = 9,409) were from the Mental Health and Access to Care Survey, a cross-sectional survey of Canadian adults during later stages of the COVID pandemic (March to July 2022). Measures included pandemic stressors (Statistics Canada), ELA (Childhood Experiences of Violence Questionnaire), social support (Social Provisions Scale), and past 12-month psychiatric problems (WHO-CIDI). Statistical analyses included two-step logistic regression models adjusted for covariates and weighted for complex survey design.
Results: Higher odds of psychiatric problems were predicted by ELA (aOR = 1.24 [1.15-1.35]-aOR = 1.53 [1.39-1.69] across psychiatric disorders) and pandemic stress (aOR = 1.18 [1.12-1.25]-aOR = 1.32 [1.26-1.39] across psychiatric disorders). Significant interactions between ELA and pandemic stress for depression (aOR = 0.96 [0.93-0.98]) suggested an attenuated effect of pandemic stress at higher levels of ELA. Social support was associated with reduced psychiatric problems (aOR = 0.88 [0.86-0.91]-aOR = 0.97 [0.94-0.99]), while pandemic stress was associated with increased psychiatric problems (aOR = 1.20 [1.15-1.26]-aOR = 1.33 [1.27-1.40]). An interaction between social support and pandemic stress for suicidality (aOR = 1.02 [1.01-1.03]) indicated that higher levels of social support were associated with increased odds of suicidality in the presence of pandemic stress, though the effect was small and of questionable clinical significance.
Conclusion: ELA and pandemic stress increased psychiatric disorder likelihood, while social support was protective. However, interactions indicate nuanced relationships in mental health risk during the pandemic.
期刊介绍:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic.
In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation.
Both original work and review articles may be submitted.