世界卫生组织痴呆患者残疾评估表2.0 (CAT-WHODAS 2.0)计算机自适应测试系统的开发。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Shih-Chieh Lee, Yi-Ching Wang, Gong-Hong Lin, Hsin-Yu Chiang, Chih-Wen Twu, Ching-Lin Hsieh
{"title":"世界卫生组织痴呆患者残疾评估表2.0 (CAT-WHODAS 2.0)计算机自适应测试系统的开发。","authors":"Shih-Chieh Lee, Yi-Ching Wang, Gong-Hong Lin, Hsin-Yu Chiang, Chih-Wen Twu, Ching-Lin Hsieh","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2025.050965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Widely used for assessing levels of disability, the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) provides informative profiles for six life perspectives. However, its utility is constrained by its lengthy assessment time, decreasing respondents' willingness to complete it.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To address the utility challenge by developing a computerized adaptive testing system of the WHODAS 2.0 (CAT-WHODAS 2.0) for people with dementia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Fit indices were analyzed for a multidimensional Rasch model. The consistency of item difficulties was examined for the score comparability for examinees across sexes. The best set of stopping rules was determined using simulations to achieve high reliability and efficiency simultaneously.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The responses of 3,124 people were obtained from a nationwide database for disability certification, assessed through interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven items exhibited satisfactory model fits (infit and outfit mean squares = .58-1.35), and no items demonstrated differential item functioning by sex (difference values = -0.07 to 0.04). With the best set of rules, the CAT-WHODQAS 2.0 required approximately nine items to provide high Rasch person reliabilities in the six domains. These reliabilities were similar to those of the item bank (.90-.91 versus .93-.96). The concurrent validity was excellent: Pearson's rs = .90-.94 with the raw domain scores and .96-.99 with item bank.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The CAT-WHODAS 2.0 can provide efficient, reliable, valid, and sex-unbiased assessments of disability for people with dementia. It may serve as an alternative for clinicians and researchers to optimize the efficiency of data collection. Plain-Language Summary: This article presents the computed adaptive testing of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (CAT-WHODAS 2.0) as an efficient solution to provide reliable, valid, and sex-unbiased assessments of disability among people with dementia. The CAT-WHODAS 2.0 is a promising alternative for clinicians because it can efficiently assess a person's level of disability with extremely high reliabilities in the six domains of functioning (cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation). The CAT-WHODAS 2.0 is also useful for researchers because its scores are comparable with those of the item bank, which consists of 27 items calibrated by the Rasch model.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (CAT-WHODAS 2.0) for People With Dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Shih-Chieh Lee, Yi-Ching Wang, Gong-Hong Lin, Hsin-Yu Chiang, Chih-Wen Twu, Ching-Lin Hsieh\",\"doi\":\"10.5014/ajot.2025.050965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Widely used for assessing levels of disability, the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) provides informative profiles for six life perspectives. However, its utility is constrained by its lengthy assessment time, decreasing respondents' willingness to complete it.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To address the utility challenge by developing a computerized adaptive testing system of the WHODAS 2.0 (CAT-WHODAS 2.0) for people with dementia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Fit indices were analyzed for a multidimensional Rasch model. The consistency of item difficulties was examined for the score comparability for examinees across sexes. The best set of stopping rules was determined using simulations to achieve high reliability and efficiency simultaneously.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The responses of 3,124 people were obtained from a nationwide database for disability certification, assessed through interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven items exhibited satisfactory model fits (infit and outfit mean squares = .58-1.35), and no items demonstrated differential item functioning by sex (difference values = -0.07 to 0.04). With the best set of rules, the CAT-WHODQAS 2.0 required approximately nine items to provide high Rasch person reliabilities in the six domains. These reliabilities were similar to those of the item bank (.90-.91 versus .93-.96). The concurrent validity was excellent: Pearson's rs = .90-.94 with the raw domain scores and .96-.99 with item bank.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The CAT-WHODAS 2.0 can provide efficient, reliable, valid, and sex-unbiased assessments of disability for people with dementia. It may serve as an alternative for clinicians and researchers to optimize the efficiency of data collection. Plain-Language Summary: This article presents the computed adaptive testing of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (CAT-WHODAS 2.0) as an efficient solution to provide reliable, valid, and sex-unbiased assessments of disability among people with dementia. The CAT-WHODAS 2.0 is a promising alternative for clinicians because it can efficiently assess a person's level of disability with extremely high reliabilities in the six domains of functioning (cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation). The CAT-WHODAS 2.0 is also useful for researchers because its scores are comparable with those of the item bank, which consists of 27 items calibrated by the Rasch model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"79 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.050965\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.050965","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:世界卫生组织残疾评估表2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)广泛用于评估残疾水平,它提供了六种生活前景的信息概况。然而,它的效用受到其漫长的评估时间的限制,降低了受访者完成它的意愿。目的:为解决痴呆患者WHODAS 2.0计算机自适应测试系统(CAT-WHODAS 2.0)的实用性挑战。设计:分析多维Rasch模型的拟合指标。对题目难度的一致性进行了测试,以确定不同性别考生的分数可比性。通过仿真确定了最优停车规则集,同时实现了高可靠性和高效率。设置:社区。参与者:3124人的回答是从全国残疾认证数据库中获得的,通过访谈进行评估。结果:27个项目表现出满意的模型拟合(infit和outfit均方= 0.58 ~ 1.35),没有项目表现出性别差异(差异值= -0.07 ~ 0.04)。使用最好的规则集,CAT-WHODQAS 2.0需要大约9个项目来在6个域中提供高的Rasch person可靠性。这些信度与题库的信度相似(0.90 -。91比0.93 - 0.96)。同时效度极好:Pearson的rs = 0.90 -。原始域得分为0.94,原始域得分为0.96。99与题库。结论和相关性:CAT-WHODAS 2.0可为痴呆患者提供高效、可靠、有效和无性别偏见的残疾评估。它可以作为临床医生和研究人员优化数据收集效率的替代方案。摘要:本文介绍了世界卫生组织残疾评估表2.0 (CAT-WHODAS 2.0)的计算适应性测试,作为一种有效的解决方案,为痴呆症患者提供可靠、有效和无性别偏见的残疾评估。CAT-WHODAS 2.0对于临床医生来说是一个很有希望的替代方案,因为它可以有效地评估一个人的残疾水平,在六个功能领域(认知、行动、自我保健、相处、生活活动和参与)具有极高的可靠性。CAT-WHODAS 2.0对研究人员也很有用,因为它的分数与由Rasch模型校准的27个项目组成的题库的分数相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (CAT-WHODAS 2.0) for People With Dementia.

Importance: Widely used for assessing levels of disability, the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) provides informative profiles for six life perspectives. However, its utility is constrained by its lengthy assessment time, decreasing respondents' willingness to complete it.

Objective: To address the utility challenge by developing a computerized adaptive testing system of the WHODAS 2.0 (CAT-WHODAS 2.0) for people with dementia.

Design: Fit indices were analyzed for a multidimensional Rasch model. The consistency of item difficulties was examined for the score comparability for examinees across sexes. The best set of stopping rules was determined using simulations to achieve high reliability and efficiency simultaneously.

Setting: Community.

Participants: The responses of 3,124 people were obtained from a nationwide database for disability certification, assessed through interviews.

Results: Twenty-seven items exhibited satisfactory model fits (infit and outfit mean squares = .58-1.35), and no items demonstrated differential item functioning by sex (difference values = -0.07 to 0.04). With the best set of rules, the CAT-WHODQAS 2.0 required approximately nine items to provide high Rasch person reliabilities in the six domains. These reliabilities were similar to those of the item bank (.90-.91 versus .93-.96). The concurrent validity was excellent: Pearson's rs = .90-.94 with the raw domain scores and .96-.99 with item bank.

Conclusions and relevance: The CAT-WHODAS 2.0 can provide efficient, reliable, valid, and sex-unbiased assessments of disability for people with dementia. It may serve as an alternative for clinicians and researchers to optimize the efficiency of data collection. Plain-Language Summary: This article presents the computed adaptive testing of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (CAT-WHODAS 2.0) as an efficient solution to provide reliable, valid, and sex-unbiased assessments of disability among people with dementia. The CAT-WHODAS 2.0 is a promising alternative for clinicians because it can efficiently assess a person's level of disability with extremely high reliabilities in the six domains of functioning (cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation). The CAT-WHODAS 2.0 is also useful for researchers because its scores are comparable with those of the item bank, which consists of 27 items calibrated by the Rasch model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信