澳大利亚脉络膜痣患者的初级眼科护理管理调查。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
R Max Conway, Thi Minh Thi Trang, Erin J Tang, Kirsten L Challinor, Isabelle Jalbert, Michele C Madigan
{"title":"澳大利亚脉络膜痣患者的初级眼科护理管理调查。","authors":"R Max Conway, Thi Minh Thi Trang, Erin J Tang, Kirsten L Challinor, Isabelle Jalbert, Michele C Madigan","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Our survey found that clinical imaging is widely utilized by many Australian eyecare practitioners for detecting and monitoring choroid nevus and highlighted knowledge gaps for risk factors and features of choroid nevus and early primary eye melanoma. Continuing education related to early detection could improve multidisciplinary management of these patients.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim is to survey Australian primary eyecare practitioners on their management of patients with choroidal nevus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A random sample of optometrists and ophthalmologists registered to practice in Australia was surveyed using a purpose-designed questionnaire including demographics, types of imaging techniques used, and practitioner choroid nevus knowledge (K), attitude (A), and practice (P).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three optometrists and 82 ophthalmologists responded. More than 50% practiced independently, most in metropolitan centers (n = 113/175). Multiple imaging techniques were used to detect and monitor choroidal nevus; >72% of practitioners routinely used optical coherence tomography and color fundus photography. KAP scores indicated moderate knowledge about choroid nevus risk factors and clinical features (mean = 5.2/9, standard deviation [SD] = 1.8). Clinical mnemonics that summarized signs of risk for nevus-to-melanoma transformation were used by <50% of practitioners overall. Scores indicated a very positive attitude to nevus management (mean = 6.5/8, SD = 1.2) but a moderate practice score (mean = 13.9/25, SD = 2.9). A significant difference between optometrists and ophthalmologists was found for knowledge, but not for attitude or practice scores. Choroid nevus patients were referred to a specialist ophthalmologist by ~30% of all practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of Australian primary eyecare practitioners used multiple imaging techniques to detect and monitor choroidal nevi. There were, however, gaps in knowledge associated with identifying risk factors for choroidal nevus growth. Our findings align with recent UK studies that highlight the importance of diligent screening and review, timely referral for potential melanoma-related risks, and encourage multidisciplinary care for choroidal nevus patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey of Australian primary eyecare management of choroidal nevus patients.\",\"authors\":\"R Max Conway, Thi Minh Thi Trang, Erin J Tang, Kirsten L Challinor, Isabelle Jalbert, Michele C Madigan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Our survey found that clinical imaging is widely utilized by many Australian eyecare practitioners for detecting and monitoring choroid nevus and highlighted knowledge gaps for risk factors and features of choroid nevus and early primary eye melanoma. Continuing education related to early detection could improve multidisciplinary management of these patients.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim is to survey Australian primary eyecare practitioners on their management of patients with choroidal nevus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A random sample of optometrists and ophthalmologists registered to practice in Australia was surveyed using a purpose-designed questionnaire including demographics, types of imaging techniques used, and practitioner choroid nevus knowledge (K), attitude (A), and practice (P).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three optometrists and 82 ophthalmologists responded. More than 50% practiced independently, most in metropolitan centers (n = 113/175). Multiple imaging techniques were used to detect and monitor choroidal nevus; >72% of practitioners routinely used optical coherence tomography and color fundus photography. KAP scores indicated moderate knowledge about choroid nevus risk factors and clinical features (mean = 5.2/9, standard deviation [SD] = 1.8). Clinical mnemonics that summarized signs of risk for nevus-to-melanoma transformation were used by <50% of practitioners overall. Scores indicated a very positive attitude to nevus management (mean = 6.5/8, SD = 1.2) but a moderate practice score (mean = 13.9/25, SD = 2.9). A significant difference between optometrists and ophthalmologists was found for knowledge, but not for attitude or practice scores. Choroid nevus patients were referred to a specialist ophthalmologist by ~30% of all practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of Australian primary eyecare practitioners used multiple imaging techniques to detect and monitor choroidal nevi. There were, however, gaps in knowledge associated with identifying risk factors for choroidal nevus growth. Our findings align with recent UK studies that highlight the importance of diligent screening and review, timely referral for potential melanoma-related risks, and encourage multidisciplinary care for choroidal nevus patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002256\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意义:我们的调查发现,临床影像学被许多澳大利亚眼科医生广泛用于脉络膜痣的检测和监测,突出了对脉络膜痣和早期原发性眼部黑色素瘤的危险因素和特征的知识空白。与早期发现相关的继续教育可以改善这些患者的多学科管理。目的:目的是调查澳大利亚初级眼科医生对脉络膜痣患者的管理。方法:随机抽取在澳大利亚注册执业的验光师和眼科医生进行问卷调查,问卷内容包括人口统计学、使用的成像技术类型、从业人员脉络膜痣知识(K)、态度(A)和执业(P)。结果:93名验光师和82名眼科医生有反馈。超过50%的人独立练习,大多数在大都市中心(n = 113/175)。采用多种成像技术检测和监测脉络膜痣;72%的从业者常规使用光学相干断层扫描和彩色眼底摄影。KAP评分表明对脉络膜痣危险因素和临床特征的了解程度中等(平均值= 5.2/9,标准差[SD] = 1.8)。结论:大多数澳大利亚初级眼科医生使用多种成像技术来检测和监测脉络膜痣。然而,与识别脉络膜痣生长的危险因素相关的知识存在空白。我们的发现与最近英国的研究一致,这些研究强调了勤奋筛查和审查的重要性,及时转诊潜在的黑色素瘤相关风险,并鼓励对脉络膜痣患者进行多学科治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survey of Australian primary eyecare management of choroidal nevus patients.

Significance: Our survey found that clinical imaging is widely utilized by many Australian eyecare practitioners for detecting and monitoring choroid nevus and highlighted knowledge gaps for risk factors and features of choroid nevus and early primary eye melanoma. Continuing education related to early detection could improve multidisciplinary management of these patients.

Purpose: The aim is to survey Australian primary eyecare practitioners on their management of patients with choroidal nevus.

Methods: A random sample of optometrists and ophthalmologists registered to practice in Australia was surveyed using a purpose-designed questionnaire including demographics, types of imaging techniques used, and practitioner choroid nevus knowledge (K), attitude (A), and practice (P).

Results: Ninety-three optometrists and 82 ophthalmologists responded. More than 50% practiced independently, most in metropolitan centers (n = 113/175). Multiple imaging techniques were used to detect and monitor choroidal nevus; >72% of practitioners routinely used optical coherence tomography and color fundus photography. KAP scores indicated moderate knowledge about choroid nevus risk factors and clinical features (mean = 5.2/9, standard deviation [SD] = 1.8). Clinical mnemonics that summarized signs of risk for nevus-to-melanoma transformation were used by <50% of practitioners overall. Scores indicated a very positive attitude to nevus management (mean = 6.5/8, SD = 1.2) but a moderate practice score (mean = 13.9/25, SD = 2.9). A significant difference between optometrists and ophthalmologists was found for knowledge, but not for attitude or practice scores. Choroid nevus patients were referred to a specialist ophthalmologist by ~30% of all practitioners.

Conclusions: The majority of Australian primary eyecare practitioners used multiple imaging techniques to detect and monitor choroidal nevi. There were, however, gaps in knowledge associated with identifying risk factors for choroidal nevus growth. Our findings align with recent UK studies that highlight the importance of diligent screening and review, timely referral for potential melanoma-related risks, and encourage multidisciplinary care for choroidal nevus patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Optometry and Vision Science
Optometry and Vision Science 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信