R Max Conway, Thi Minh Thi Trang, Erin J Tang, Kirsten L Challinor, Isabelle Jalbert, Michele C Madigan
{"title":"澳大利亚脉络膜痣患者的初级眼科护理管理调查。","authors":"R Max Conway, Thi Minh Thi Trang, Erin J Tang, Kirsten L Challinor, Isabelle Jalbert, Michele C Madigan","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Our survey found that clinical imaging is widely utilized by many Australian eyecare practitioners for detecting and monitoring choroid nevus and highlighted knowledge gaps for risk factors and features of choroid nevus and early primary eye melanoma. Continuing education related to early detection could improve multidisciplinary management of these patients.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim is to survey Australian primary eyecare practitioners on their management of patients with choroidal nevus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A random sample of optometrists and ophthalmologists registered to practice in Australia was surveyed using a purpose-designed questionnaire including demographics, types of imaging techniques used, and practitioner choroid nevus knowledge (K), attitude (A), and practice (P).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three optometrists and 82 ophthalmologists responded. More than 50% practiced independently, most in metropolitan centers (n = 113/175). Multiple imaging techniques were used to detect and monitor choroidal nevus; >72% of practitioners routinely used optical coherence tomography and color fundus photography. KAP scores indicated moderate knowledge about choroid nevus risk factors and clinical features (mean = 5.2/9, standard deviation [SD] = 1.8). Clinical mnemonics that summarized signs of risk for nevus-to-melanoma transformation were used by <50% of practitioners overall. Scores indicated a very positive attitude to nevus management (mean = 6.5/8, SD = 1.2) but a moderate practice score (mean = 13.9/25, SD = 2.9). A significant difference between optometrists and ophthalmologists was found for knowledge, but not for attitude or practice scores. Choroid nevus patients were referred to a specialist ophthalmologist by ~30% of all practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of Australian primary eyecare practitioners used multiple imaging techniques to detect and monitor choroidal nevi. There were, however, gaps in knowledge associated with identifying risk factors for choroidal nevus growth. Our findings align with recent UK studies that highlight the importance of diligent screening and review, timely referral for potential melanoma-related risks, and encourage multidisciplinary care for choroidal nevus patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey of Australian primary eyecare management of choroidal nevus patients.\",\"authors\":\"R Max Conway, Thi Minh Thi Trang, Erin J Tang, Kirsten L Challinor, Isabelle Jalbert, Michele C Madigan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Our survey found that clinical imaging is widely utilized by many Australian eyecare practitioners for detecting and monitoring choroid nevus and highlighted knowledge gaps for risk factors and features of choroid nevus and early primary eye melanoma. Continuing education related to early detection could improve multidisciplinary management of these patients.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim is to survey Australian primary eyecare practitioners on their management of patients with choroidal nevus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A random sample of optometrists and ophthalmologists registered to practice in Australia was surveyed using a purpose-designed questionnaire including demographics, types of imaging techniques used, and practitioner choroid nevus knowledge (K), attitude (A), and practice (P).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three optometrists and 82 ophthalmologists responded. More than 50% practiced independently, most in metropolitan centers (n = 113/175). Multiple imaging techniques were used to detect and monitor choroidal nevus; >72% of practitioners routinely used optical coherence tomography and color fundus photography. KAP scores indicated moderate knowledge about choroid nevus risk factors and clinical features (mean = 5.2/9, standard deviation [SD] = 1.8). Clinical mnemonics that summarized signs of risk for nevus-to-melanoma transformation were used by <50% of practitioners overall. Scores indicated a very positive attitude to nevus management (mean = 6.5/8, SD = 1.2) but a moderate practice score (mean = 13.9/25, SD = 2.9). A significant difference between optometrists and ophthalmologists was found for knowledge, but not for attitude or practice scores. Choroid nevus patients were referred to a specialist ophthalmologist by ~30% of all practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of Australian primary eyecare practitioners used multiple imaging techniques to detect and monitor choroidal nevi. There were, however, gaps in knowledge associated with identifying risk factors for choroidal nevus growth. Our findings align with recent UK studies that highlight the importance of diligent screening and review, timely referral for potential melanoma-related risks, and encourage multidisciplinary care for choroidal nevus patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002256\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Survey of Australian primary eyecare management of choroidal nevus patients.
Significance: Our survey found that clinical imaging is widely utilized by many Australian eyecare practitioners for detecting and monitoring choroid nevus and highlighted knowledge gaps for risk factors and features of choroid nevus and early primary eye melanoma. Continuing education related to early detection could improve multidisciplinary management of these patients.
Purpose: The aim is to survey Australian primary eyecare practitioners on their management of patients with choroidal nevus.
Methods: A random sample of optometrists and ophthalmologists registered to practice in Australia was surveyed using a purpose-designed questionnaire including demographics, types of imaging techniques used, and practitioner choroid nevus knowledge (K), attitude (A), and practice (P).
Results: Ninety-three optometrists and 82 ophthalmologists responded. More than 50% practiced independently, most in metropolitan centers (n = 113/175). Multiple imaging techniques were used to detect and monitor choroidal nevus; >72% of practitioners routinely used optical coherence tomography and color fundus photography. KAP scores indicated moderate knowledge about choroid nevus risk factors and clinical features (mean = 5.2/9, standard deviation [SD] = 1.8). Clinical mnemonics that summarized signs of risk for nevus-to-melanoma transformation were used by <50% of practitioners overall. Scores indicated a very positive attitude to nevus management (mean = 6.5/8, SD = 1.2) but a moderate practice score (mean = 13.9/25, SD = 2.9). A significant difference between optometrists and ophthalmologists was found for knowledge, but not for attitude or practice scores. Choroid nevus patients were referred to a specialist ophthalmologist by ~30% of all practitioners.
Conclusions: The majority of Australian primary eyecare practitioners used multiple imaging techniques to detect and monitor choroidal nevi. There were, however, gaps in knowledge associated with identifying risk factors for choroidal nevus growth. Our findings align with recent UK studies that highlight the importance of diligent screening and review, timely referral for potential melanoma-related risks, and encourage multidisciplinary care for choroidal nevus patients.
期刊介绍:
Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.