Zhiqiang Yu, Yan Liu, Fangqi Duan, Qian Li, Dong Yan, Li Zhang, Zhuangzhuang Wang, Minyu Zhang, Qi Zhao
{"title":"剖宫产全麻期间右美托咪定给药对母亲和胎儿/新生儿的影响及安全性:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Zhiqiang Yu, Yan Liu, Fangqi Duan, Qian Li, Dong Yan, Li Zhang, Zhuangzhuang Wang, Minyu Zhang, Qi Zhao","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2025.2495089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the safety of dexmedetomidine administration to mothers, fetuses, and neonates during general anesthesia in cesarean section (CS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 60 parturients scheduled for elective CS under general anesthesia were randomly divided into anesthesia in groups (DEX1 and DEX2) and control (C) groups. Groups DEX1 and DEX2 were induced with dexmedetomidine (induction, 0.4 µg/kg; maintenance, 0.4 µg/kg·h) and dexmedetomidine (induction, 0.6 µg/kg; maintenance, 0.6 µg/kg·h), respectively, until birth. Equivalent volumes of normal saline were administered in group C. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and rocuronium in all groups. The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of parturients were monitored and recorded; fetal HR was monitored using color doppler ultrasound. The blood gas analysis from the umbilical artery (UA) and umbilical vein (UV), along with the HR, Apgar score and Neurologic Adaptive Capacity Scores (NACS) of neonates, were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maternal MAP at intubation/skin incision, maternal HR at intubation/skin incision and delivery were significantly lower in groups DEX1 and DEX2 than in group C, no significant differences were observed between groups DEX1 and DEX2. No significant differences were observed in fetal HR, UA and UV blood gas analyses, Apgar score and NACS of neonates in the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravenous 0.4 or 0.6 µg/kg doses of dexmedetomidine with propofol for general anesthesia in CS is beneficial for inhibiting the maternal stress response induced by intubation/skin incision and delivery without significant adverse effects on fetuses or neonates. Our findings suggest that dexmedetomidine is safe for mothers, fetuses, and neonates in obstetric general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":"38 1","pages":"2495089"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Administration on Mother and Foetus/Neonates During General Anaesthesia in Caesarean Section: A Randomised Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiqiang Yu, Yan Liu, Fangqi Duan, Qian Li, Dong Yan, Li Zhang, Zhuangzhuang Wang, Minyu Zhang, Qi Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08941939.2025.2495089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the safety of dexmedetomidine administration to mothers, fetuses, and neonates during general anesthesia in cesarean section (CS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 60 parturients scheduled for elective CS under general anesthesia were randomly divided into anesthesia in groups (DEX1 and DEX2) and control (C) groups. Groups DEX1 and DEX2 were induced with dexmedetomidine (induction, 0.4 µg/kg; maintenance, 0.4 µg/kg·h) and dexmedetomidine (induction, 0.6 µg/kg; maintenance, 0.6 µg/kg·h), respectively, until birth. Equivalent volumes of normal saline were administered in group C. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and rocuronium in all groups. The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of parturients were monitored and recorded; fetal HR was monitored using color doppler ultrasound. The blood gas analysis from the umbilical artery (UA) and umbilical vein (UV), along with the HR, Apgar score and Neurologic Adaptive Capacity Scores (NACS) of neonates, were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maternal MAP at intubation/skin incision, maternal HR at intubation/skin incision and delivery were significantly lower in groups DEX1 and DEX2 than in group C, no significant differences were observed between groups DEX1 and DEX2. No significant differences were observed in fetal HR, UA and UV blood gas analyses, Apgar score and NACS of neonates in the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravenous 0.4 or 0.6 µg/kg doses of dexmedetomidine with propofol for general anesthesia in CS is beneficial for inhibiting the maternal stress response induced by intubation/skin incision and delivery without significant adverse effects on fetuses or neonates. Our findings suggest that dexmedetomidine is safe for mothers, fetuses, and neonates in obstetric general anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative Surgery\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"2495089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2025.2495089\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2025.2495089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effect and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Administration on Mother and Foetus/Neonates During General Anaesthesia in Caesarean Section: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the safety of dexmedetomidine administration to mothers, fetuses, and neonates during general anesthesia in cesarean section (CS).
Patients and methods: A total of 60 parturients scheduled for elective CS under general anesthesia were randomly divided into anesthesia in groups (DEX1 and DEX2) and control (C) groups. Groups DEX1 and DEX2 were induced with dexmedetomidine (induction, 0.4 µg/kg; maintenance, 0.4 µg/kg·h) and dexmedetomidine (induction, 0.6 µg/kg; maintenance, 0.6 µg/kg·h), respectively, until birth. Equivalent volumes of normal saline were administered in group C. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and rocuronium in all groups. The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of parturients were monitored and recorded; fetal HR was monitored using color doppler ultrasound. The blood gas analysis from the umbilical artery (UA) and umbilical vein (UV), along with the HR, Apgar score and Neurologic Adaptive Capacity Scores (NACS) of neonates, were recorded.
Results: Maternal MAP at intubation/skin incision, maternal HR at intubation/skin incision and delivery were significantly lower in groups DEX1 and DEX2 than in group C, no significant differences were observed between groups DEX1 and DEX2. No significant differences were observed in fetal HR, UA and UV blood gas analyses, Apgar score and NACS of neonates in the three groups.
Conclusion: Intravenous 0.4 or 0.6 µg/kg doses of dexmedetomidine with propofol for general anesthesia in CS is beneficial for inhibiting the maternal stress response induced by intubation/skin incision and delivery without significant adverse effects on fetuses or neonates. Our findings suggest that dexmedetomidine is safe for mothers, fetuses, and neonates in obstetric general anesthesia.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.