{"title":"澳大利亚治疗疼痛的抗癫痫药物处方的横断面研究。","authors":"Ting Xia, Jenni Ilomaki, Louisa Picco, Suzanne Nielsen","doi":"10.1007/s11096-025-01915-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antiseizure medications, particularly gabapentinoids like pregabalin, are increasingly prescribed for pain management. Despite their growing use, evidence of their effectiveness for pain is mixed. This highlights the need for a clearer understanding of the prevalence and prescribing patterns of antiseizure medications in pain management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the initiation of antiseizure medications in people with and without pain or epilepsy diagnoses and to explore the concurrent use of opioids.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional study used deidentified primary care data from 542 general practices in Victoria, Australia. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze antiseizure medication prevalence, concurrent opioid use, and prescribing patterns by age and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 171,619 primary care patients who initiated an antiseizure medication between January 1, 2018, and May 31, 2023, among whom 80.1% had pain without epilepsy. Pregabalin was the most commonly prescribed medicine (58.2%), followed by sodium valproate (7.0%), gabapentin (6.9%), and clonazepam (6.7%). Among younger patients (14-49 years old) with an epilepsy diagnosis, women were twice as likely as men to initiate topiramate (6.5% vs 4.4%) and lamotrigine (21.8% vs 11.4%), while men were more commonly initiated with sodium valproate (38.7% vs 18.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the widespread off-label use of gabapentinoids and the potential for serious harm, further research is warranted to better understand their clinical and safety outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cross-sectional study of prescribing of antiseizure medication for the treatment of pain in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Ting Xia, Jenni Ilomaki, Louisa Picco, Suzanne Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11096-025-01915-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antiseizure medications, particularly gabapentinoids like pregabalin, are increasingly prescribed for pain management. Despite their growing use, evidence of their effectiveness for pain is mixed. This highlights the need for a clearer understanding of the prevalence and prescribing patterns of antiseizure medications in pain management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the initiation of antiseizure medications in people with and without pain or epilepsy diagnoses and to explore the concurrent use of opioids.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional study used deidentified primary care data from 542 general practices in Victoria, Australia. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze antiseizure medication prevalence, concurrent opioid use, and prescribing patterns by age and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 171,619 primary care patients who initiated an antiseizure medication between January 1, 2018, and May 31, 2023, among whom 80.1% had pain without epilepsy. Pregabalin was the most commonly prescribed medicine (58.2%), followed by sodium valproate (7.0%), gabapentin (6.9%), and clonazepam (6.7%). Among younger patients (14-49 years old) with an epilepsy diagnosis, women were twice as likely as men to initiate topiramate (6.5% vs 4.4%) and lamotrigine (21.8% vs 11.4%), while men were more commonly initiated with sodium valproate (38.7% vs 18.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the widespread off-label use of gabapentinoids and the potential for serious harm, further research is warranted to better understand their clinical and safety outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01915-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01915-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:抗癫痫药物,特别是加巴喷丁类药物如普瑞巴林,越来越多地被用于疼痛治疗。尽管越来越多的人使用它们,但它们对疼痛的有效性证据却参差不齐。这突出了需要更清楚地了解疼痛管理中抗癫痫药物的患病率和处方模式。目的:探讨有和没有疼痛或癫痫诊断的人群抗癫痫药物的开始使用情况,并探讨阿片类药物的并发使用情况。方法:这项横断面研究使用了澳大利亚维多利亚州542个全科诊所的未识别初级保健数据。描述性统计用于分析抗癫痫药物的流行,同时阿片类药物的使用,以及按年龄和性别划分的处方模式。结果:我们确定了171,619名在2018年1月1日至2023年5月31日期间开始使用抗癫痫药物的初级保健患者,其中80.1%有疼痛但无癫痫。普瑞巴林是最常用的处方药(58.2%),其次是丙戊酸钠(7.0%)、加巴喷丁(6.9%)和氯硝西泮(6.7%)。在被诊断为癫痫的年轻患者(14-49岁)中,女性开始使用托吡酯(6.5% vs 4.4%)和拉莫三嗪(21.8% vs 11.4%)的可能性是男性的两倍,而男性更常开始使用丙戊酸钠(38.7% vs 18.9%)。结论:鉴于加巴喷丁类药物的广泛超说明书使用和潜在的严重危害,有必要进一步研究以更好地了解其临床和安全性结果。
A cross-sectional study of prescribing of antiseizure medication for the treatment of pain in Australia.
Background: Antiseizure medications, particularly gabapentinoids like pregabalin, are increasingly prescribed for pain management. Despite their growing use, evidence of their effectiveness for pain is mixed. This highlights the need for a clearer understanding of the prevalence and prescribing patterns of antiseizure medications in pain management.
Aim: To investigate the initiation of antiseizure medications in people with and without pain or epilepsy diagnoses and to explore the concurrent use of opioids.
Method: This cross-sectional study used deidentified primary care data from 542 general practices in Victoria, Australia. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze antiseizure medication prevalence, concurrent opioid use, and prescribing patterns by age and gender.
Results: We identified 171,619 primary care patients who initiated an antiseizure medication between January 1, 2018, and May 31, 2023, among whom 80.1% had pain without epilepsy. Pregabalin was the most commonly prescribed medicine (58.2%), followed by sodium valproate (7.0%), gabapentin (6.9%), and clonazepam (6.7%). Among younger patients (14-49 years old) with an epilepsy diagnosis, women were twice as likely as men to initiate topiramate (6.5% vs 4.4%) and lamotrigine (21.8% vs 11.4%), while men were more commonly initiated with sodium valproate (38.7% vs 18.9%).
Conclusion: Given the widespread off-label use of gabapentinoids and the potential for serious harm, further research is warranted to better understand their clinical and safety outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences.
IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy.
IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor.
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy .
Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.