完善文化安全、文化能力和土著居民健康的定义:来自新西兰奥特罗阿的经验教训。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Elana Curtis, Belinda Loring, Rhys Jones, David Tipene-Leach, Curtis Walker, Sarah-Jane Paine, Papaarangi Reid
{"title":"完善文化安全、文化能力和土著居民健康的定义:来自新西兰奥特罗阿的经验教训。","authors":"Elana Curtis, Belinda Loring, Rhys Jones, David Tipene-Leach, Curtis Walker, Sarah-Jane Paine, Papaarangi Reid","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02478-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eliminating Indigenous and ethnic health inequities requires culturally-competent and culturally-safe health workforces and systems. Health professional training institutions and regulatory bodies are increasingly including cultural competency and cultural safety in health professional accreditation standards, and pre-service and in-service training programmes. However, there are mixed definitions and understandings of cultural competency and cultural safety, and how best to achieve them. In 2019, we published a review of international understandings of these terms, and proposed an Indigenous-led definition for cultural safety that we believed to be more fit for purpose in achieving health equity. We also clarified essential principles and practical steps to operationalise this approach in healthcare organisations and workforce development. The aim of this paper is to share our expert reflections upon the experience over the six years since 2019, of implementing this definition in an Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) context. Recent work undertaken with health regulatory bodies in NZ to refine the understandings of cultural competency, cultural safety and Indigenous health has extended our positioning on these important concepts. A practical example of how these related but distinct concepts apply to Indigenous health is presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"130"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining the definitions of cultural safety, cultural competency and Indigenous health: lessons from Aotearoa New Zealand.\",\"authors\":\"Elana Curtis, Belinda Loring, Rhys Jones, David Tipene-Leach, Curtis Walker, Sarah-Jane Paine, Papaarangi Reid\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12939-025-02478-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Eliminating Indigenous and ethnic health inequities requires culturally-competent and culturally-safe health workforces and systems. Health professional training institutions and regulatory bodies are increasingly including cultural competency and cultural safety in health professional accreditation standards, and pre-service and in-service training programmes. However, there are mixed definitions and understandings of cultural competency and cultural safety, and how best to achieve them. In 2019, we published a review of international understandings of these terms, and proposed an Indigenous-led definition for cultural safety that we believed to be more fit for purpose in achieving health equity. We also clarified essential principles and practical steps to operationalise this approach in healthcare organisations and workforce development. The aim of this paper is to share our expert reflections upon the experience over the six years since 2019, of implementing this definition in an Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) context. Recent work undertaken with health regulatory bodies in NZ to refine the understandings of cultural competency, cultural safety and Indigenous health has extended our positioning on these important concepts. A practical example of how these related but distinct concepts apply to Indigenous health is presented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063315/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02478-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02478-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

消除土著和族裔卫生不平等需要具有文化能力和文化安全的卫生工作人员和系统。卫生专业培训机构和监管机构越来越多地将文化能力和文化安全纳入卫生专业认证标准以及职前和在职培训方案。然而,对于文化能力和文化安全,以及如何最好地实现它们,人们的定义和理解是混杂的。2019年,我们发表了对这些术语的国际理解的回顾,并提出了土著主导的文化安全定义,我们认为该定义更适合实现健康公平的目的。我们还明确了在医疗机构和劳动力发展中实施这一方法的基本原则和实际步骤。本文的目的是分享我们对自2019年以来六年来在新西兰(NZ)实施这一定义的经验的专家思考。最近与新西兰卫生监管机构合作,改进了对文化能力、文化安全和土著居民健康的理解,扩大了我们对这些重要概念的定位。提出了一个实际的例子,说明这些相关但不同的概念如何适用于土著居民的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refining the definitions of cultural safety, cultural competency and Indigenous health: lessons from Aotearoa New Zealand.

Eliminating Indigenous and ethnic health inequities requires culturally-competent and culturally-safe health workforces and systems. Health professional training institutions and regulatory bodies are increasingly including cultural competency and cultural safety in health professional accreditation standards, and pre-service and in-service training programmes. However, there are mixed definitions and understandings of cultural competency and cultural safety, and how best to achieve them. In 2019, we published a review of international understandings of these terms, and proposed an Indigenous-led definition for cultural safety that we believed to be more fit for purpose in achieving health equity. We also clarified essential principles and practical steps to operationalise this approach in healthcare organisations and workforce development. The aim of this paper is to share our expert reflections upon the experience over the six years since 2019, of implementing this definition in an Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) context. Recent work undertaken with health regulatory bodies in NZ to refine the understandings of cultural competency, cultural safety and Indigenous health has extended our positioning on these important concepts. A practical example of how these related but distinct concepts apply to Indigenous health is presented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信