肯尼亚Nyandarua县农田农药操作和加工方法对马铃薯块茎中农药残留水平的影响

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Millicent Kanario, Joseph Wafula Matofari, John Masani Nduko
{"title":"肯尼亚Nyandarua县农田农药操作和加工方法对马铃薯块茎中农药残留水平的影响","authors":"Millicent Kanario,&nbsp;Joseph Wafula Matofari,&nbsp;John Masani Nduko","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In Kenya, the extensive use of agrochemicals in potato farming raises concerns about pesticide residues in potato tubers and products. This study aimed to document the pesticide application practices of potato farmers in Nyandarua County, Kenya and evaluate the effect of the practices on pesticide residue levels in raw potato tubers. Also, the study evaluated the effect of various heat processing methods on the pesticide residue levels in potatoes. A cross-sectional survey using semi-structured questionnaires was conducted on 275 randomly selected farmers. Alongside, raw <em>Shangi</em> potato variety samples (<em>n</em> = 16) from respective farmers were analyzed for some of the most commonly used pesticide residues using LC-MS/MS and GC–MS/MS. The study found that 98.8% of farmers use synthetic pesticides, with 96.4% using fungicides, 68.2% insecticides, and 28.7% herbicides. Common fungicides contained mancozeb, metalaxyl, and cymoxanil as the main active ingredients. Insecticides contained α-cypermethrin and imidacloprid, while herbicides had glyphosate and 2,4-D as the main active ingredients. These chemicals were used either alone or in mixtures. Only 11.85% of farmers adhered to the recommended manufacturer’s application rates, with the majority relying on advice from agrochemical retailers (74.63%) or other farmers (13.32%). The frequent mixing of pesticides and weekly applications were also common practices. Residue analysis revealed that adherence to the manufacturer’s instructions resulted in lower residue levels. Mixing pesticides and frequent applications led to higher residues, particularly for fungicides containing azoxystrobin. Longer preharvest intervals generally reduced residue levels. Most of the pesticide residues were below the EU and Codex Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) in potatoes, however, the banned insecticides containing chlorpyrifos and fenitrothion were found at levels exceeding the EU and Codex MRLs of 0.01 mg/kg. Processing methods such as frying, baking, boiling, and steaming significantly reduced pesticide residues, below the Codex MRLs. Frying and boiling were particularly effective for most pesticides. However, baking, roasting, and frying were not effective in reducing chlorpyrifos and fenitrothion below EU and Codex MRLs. The findings highlight the need for farmer education on proper pesticide use and adherence to recommended practices to minimize residue levels and ensure food safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 7","pages":"Article 100521"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of On-farm Pesticide Practices and Processing Methods on Pesticide Residue Levels in Potato Tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Nyandarua County, Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Millicent Kanario,&nbsp;Joseph Wafula Matofari,&nbsp;John Masani Nduko\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In Kenya, the extensive use of agrochemicals in potato farming raises concerns about pesticide residues in potato tubers and products. This study aimed to document the pesticide application practices of potato farmers in Nyandarua County, Kenya and evaluate the effect of the practices on pesticide residue levels in raw potato tubers. Also, the study evaluated the effect of various heat processing methods on the pesticide residue levels in potatoes. A cross-sectional survey using semi-structured questionnaires was conducted on 275 randomly selected farmers. Alongside, raw <em>Shangi</em> potato variety samples (<em>n</em> = 16) from respective farmers were analyzed for some of the most commonly used pesticide residues using LC-MS/MS and GC–MS/MS. The study found that 98.8% of farmers use synthetic pesticides, with 96.4% using fungicides, 68.2% insecticides, and 28.7% herbicides. Common fungicides contained mancozeb, metalaxyl, and cymoxanil as the main active ingredients. Insecticides contained α-cypermethrin and imidacloprid, while herbicides had glyphosate and 2,4-D as the main active ingredients. These chemicals were used either alone or in mixtures. Only 11.85% of farmers adhered to the recommended manufacturer’s application rates, with the majority relying on advice from agrochemical retailers (74.63%) or other farmers (13.32%). The frequent mixing of pesticides and weekly applications were also common practices. Residue analysis revealed that adherence to the manufacturer’s instructions resulted in lower residue levels. Mixing pesticides and frequent applications led to higher residues, particularly for fungicides containing azoxystrobin. Longer preharvest intervals generally reduced residue levels. Most of the pesticide residues were below the EU and Codex Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) in potatoes, however, the banned insecticides containing chlorpyrifos and fenitrothion were found at levels exceeding the EU and Codex MRLs of 0.01 mg/kg. Processing methods such as frying, baking, boiling, and steaming significantly reduced pesticide residues, below the Codex MRLs. Frying and boiling were particularly effective for most pesticides. However, baking, roasting, and frying were not effective in reducing chlorpyrifos and fenitrothion below EU and Codex MRLs. The findings highlight the need for farmer education on proper pesticide use and adherence to recommended practices to minimize residue levels and ensure food safety.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"88 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 100521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25000730\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25000730","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在肯尼亚,马铃薯种植中农药的广泛使用引起了人们对马铃薯块茎和产品中农药残留的担忧。本研究旨在记录肯尼亚Nyandarua县马铃薯农民的农药施用做法,并评估这些做法对生马铃薯块茎中农药残留水平的影响。此外,本研究还评估了不同热处理方法对马铃薯中农药残留水平的影响。采用半结构式问卷对随机抽取的275名农户进行横断面调查。此外,我们还利用LC-MS/MS和GC-MS/MS对来自不同农户的16个马铃薯品种进行了农药残留分析。研究发现,98.8%的农民使用合成农药,96.4%使用杀菌剂,68.2%使用杀虫剂,28.7%使用除草剂。常用杀菌剂的主要有效成分为代森锰锌、甲螨灵和氰胺。杀虫剂主要含有α-氯氰菊酯和吡虫啉,除草剂主要有效成分为草甘膦和2,4- d。这些化学品要么单独使用,要么混合使用。只有11.85%的农民遵守了推荐的制造商的应用率,大多数农民依赖农化零售商(74.63%)或其他农民(13.32%)的建议。经常混合使用农药和每周使用一次也是常见的做法。残留分析显示,遵守制造商的说明导致了较低的残留水平。混合农药和频繁使用导致了更高的残留物,特别是含有偶氮嘧菌酯的杀菌剂。较长的收获前间隔通常会降低残留水平。大部分农药残留低于欧盟和食品法典最高残留限量(MRLs),但含有毒死蜱和杀虫硫磷的禁用杀虫剂含量超过欧盟和食品法典最高残留限量(0.01mg/kg)。油炸、烘烤、煮沸和蒸煮等加工方法显著降低了农药残留,低于食品法典规定的最大残留限量。油炸和煮沸对大多数杀虫剂特别有效。然而,烘焙、烘烤和油炸并不能有效地将毒死蜱和虫硫磷降至欧盟和食品法典的最大限量以下。研究结果强调,有必要对农民进行农药正确使用教育,并遵守建议的做法,以尽量减少残留水平,确保食品安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of On-farm Pesticide Practices and Processing Methods on Pesticide Residue Levels in Potato Tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Nyandarua County, Kenya
In Kenya, the extensive use of agrochemicals in potato farming raises concerns about pesticide residues in potato tubers and products. This study aimed to document the pesticide application practices of potato farmers in Nyandarua County, Kenya and evaluate the effect of the practices on pesticide residue levels in raw potato tubers. Also, the study evaluated the effect of various heat processing methods on the pesticide residue levels in potatoes. A cross-sectional survey using semi-structured questionnaires was conducted on 275 randomly selected farmers. Alongside, raw Shangi potato variety samples (n = 16) from respective farmers were analyzed for some of the most commonly used pesticide residues using LC-MS/MS and GC–MS/MS. The study found that 98.8% of farmers use synthetic pesticides, with 96.4% using fungicides, 68.2% insecticides, and 28.7% herbicides. Common fungicides contained mancozeb, metalaxyl, and cymoxanil as the main active ingredients. Insecticides contained α-cypermethrin and imidacloprid, while herbicides had glyphosate and 2,4-D as the main active ingredients. These chemicals were used either alone or in mixtures. Only 11.85% of farmers adhered to the recommended manufacturer’s application rates, with the majority relying on advice from agrochemical retailers (74.63%) or other farmers (13.32%). The frequent mixing of pesticides and weekly applications were also common practices. Residue analysis revealed that adherence to the manufacturer’s instructions resulted in lower residue levels. Mixing pesticides and frequent applications led to higher residues, particularly for fungicides containing azoxystrobin. Longer preharvest intervals generally reduced residue levels. Most of the pesticide residues were below the EU and Codex Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) in potatoes, however, the banned insecticides containing chlorpyrifos and fenitrothion were found at levels exceeding the EU and Codex MRLs of 0.01 mg/kg. Processing methods such as frying, baking, boiling, and steaming significantly reduced pesticide residues, below the Codex MRLs. Frying and boiling were particularly effective for most pesticides. However, baking, roasting, and frying were not effective in reducing chlorpyrifos and fenitrothion below EU and Codex MRLs. The findings highlight the need for farmer education on proper pesticide use and adherence to recommended practices to minimize residue levels and ensure food safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信