M Lathuilliere, I Prang, M-C Picot, V Macioce, M Mondain, N Loundon
{"title":"利用LENA语言与环境分析系统- A CONSORT分析,改善人工耳蜗植入儿童的语言环境。","authors":"M Lathuilliere, I Prang, M-C Picot, V Macioce, M Mondain, N Loundon","doi":"10.1016/j.anorl.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the contribution of family counseling based on Language and Environment Analysis (LENA) recording data to improving the language environment of children with cochlear implants.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Cochlear implanted children with prelingual deafness were included from 2 French cochlear implant centers and randomized between 2 age-matched groups: intervention and control. LENA recording and lexical assessment (PPVT-R or GAEL-P) were performed at T1 and, 5 months later, T2. Between the two, intervention group families received feedback from the LENA recording and parental counseling.</p><p><strong>Endpoints: </strong>The main endpoint was improvement in language environment after LENA-based family counseling: adult word count (AWC), child vocalizations (CV), conversational turns (CT), and TV/media exposure (TV). Secondary endpoints comprised feasibility of LENA and the impact of the language environment on language reception (PPVT-R and GAEL-P scores).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-three of the 90 included children were analyzed. Mean age was 39±14.2 months, with 43 boys. Between T1 and T2, CT increased by 15 percentiles in the intervention group, in contrast to a median 0 change in controls (P=0.03). For the other 3 LENA parameters (CV, AWC, TV), median change was zero, in both groups. Mean implant acceptability rating was 83%. Lexical reception scores correlated positively with CV (r=0.37, P<0.01), AWC (r=0.31, P<0.01) and CT (r=0.41, P<0.01) but not with TV (r=0.11, P=0.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LENA system can help parents optimize the child's language environment, and thus oral language development, particularly in young children.</p>","PeriodicalId":48834,"journal":{"name":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the language environment for children with cochlear implants, using the LENA language and environment analysis system - A CONSORT analysis.\",\"authors\":\"M Lathuilliere, I Prang, M-C Picot, V Macioce, M Mondain, N Loundon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anorl.2025.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the contribution of family counseling based on Language and Environment Analysis (LENA) recording data to improving the language environment of children with cochlear implants.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Cochlear implanted children with prelingual deafness were included from 2 French cochlear implant centers and randomized between 2 age-matched groups: intervention and control. LENA recording and lexical assessment (PPVT-R or GAEL-P) were performed at T1 and, 5 months later, T2. Between the two, intervention group families received feedback from the LENA recording and parental counseling.</p><p><strong>Endpoints: </strong>The main endpoint was improvement in language environment after LENA-based family counseling: adult word count (AWC), child vocalizations (CV), conversational turns (CT), and TV/media exposure (TV). Secondary endpoints comprised feasibility of LENA and the impact of the language environment on language reception (PPVT-R and GAEL-P scores).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-three of the 90 included children were analyzed. Mean age was 39±14.2 months, with 43 boys. Between T1 and T2, CT increased by 15 percentiles in the intervention group, in contrast to a median 0 change in controls (P=0.03). For the other 3 LENA parameters (CV, AWC, TV), median change was zero, in both groups. Mean implant acceptability rating was 83%. Lexical reception scores correlated positively with CV (r=0.37, P<0.01), AWC (r=0.31, P<0.01) and CT (r=0.41, P<0.01) but not with TV (r=0.11, P=0.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LENA system can help parents optimize the child's language environment, and thus oral language development, particularly in young children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2025.04.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2025.04.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving the language environment for children with cochlear implants, using the LENA language and environment analysis system - A CONSORT analysis.
Objectives: To assess the contribution of family counseling based on Language and Environment Analysis (LENA) recording data to improving the language environment of children with cochlear implants.
Material and methods: Cochlear implanted children with prelingual deafness were included from 2 French cochlear implant centers and randomized between 2 age-matched groups: intervention and control. LENA recording and lexical assessment (PPVT-R or GAEL-P) were performed at T1 and, 5 months later, T2. Between the two, intervention group families received feedback from the LENA recording and parental counseling.
Endpoints: The main endpoint was improvement in language environment after LENA-based family counseling: adult word count (AWC), child vocalizations (CV), conversational turns (CT), and TV/media exposure (TV). Secondary endpoints comprised feasibility of LENA and the impact of the language environment on language reception (PPVT-R and GAEL-P scores).
Results: Eighty-three of the 90 included children were analyzed. Mean age was 39±14.2 months, with 43 boys. Between T1 and T2, CT increased by 15 percentiles in the intervention group, in contrast to a median 0 change in controls (P=0.03). For the other 3 LENA parameters (CV, AWC, TV), median change was zero, in both groups. Mean implant acceptability rating was 83%. Lexical reception scores correlated positively with CV (r=0.37, P<0.01), AWC (r=0.31, P<0.01) and CT (r=0.41, P<0.01) but not with TV (r=0.11, P=0.33).
Conclusion: The LENA system can help parents optimize the child's language environment, and thus oral language development, particularly in young children.
期刊介绍:
European Annals of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck diseases heir of one of the oldest otorhinolaryngology journals in Europe is the official organ of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SFORL) and the the International Francophone Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SIFORL). Today six annual issues provide original peer reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches and review articles giving most up-to-date insights in all areas of otology, laryngology rhinology, head and neck surgery. The European Annals also publish the SFORL guidelines and recommendations.The journal is a unique two-armed publication: the European Annals (ANORL) is an English language well referenced online journal (e-only) whereas the Annales Françaises d’ORL (AFORL), mail-order paper and online edition in French language are aimed at the French-speaking community. French language teams must submit their articles in French to the AFORL site.
Federating journal in its field, the European Annals has an Editorial board of experts with international reputation that allow to make an important contribution to communication on new research data and clinical practice by publishing high-quality articles.