利用LENA语言与环境分析系统- A CONSORT分析,改善人工耳蜗植入儿童的语言环境。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
M Lathuilliere, I Prang, M-C Picot, V Macioce, M Mondain, N Loundon
{"title":"利用LENA语言与环境分析系统- A CONSORT分析,改善人工耳蜗植入儿童的语言环境。","authors":"M Lathuilliere, I Prang, M-C Picot, V Macioce, M Mondain, N Loundon","doi":"10.1016/j.anorl.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the contribution of family counseling based on Language and Environment Analysis (LENA) recording data to improving the language environment of children with cochlear implants.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Cochlear implanted children with prelingual deafness were included from 2 French cochlear implant centers and randomized between 2 age-matched groups: intervention and control. LENA recording and lexical assessment (PPVT-R or GAEL-P) were performed at T1 and, 5 months later, T2. Between the two, intervention group families received feedback from the LENA recording and parental counseling.</p><p><strong>Endpoints: </strong>The main endpoint was improvement in language environment after LENA-based family counseling: adult word count (AWC), child vocalizations (CV), conversational turns (CT), and TV/media exposure (TV). Secondary endpoints comprised feasibility of LENA and the impact of the language environment on language reception (PPVT-R and GAEL-P scores).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-three of the 90 included children were analyzed. Mean age was 39±14.2 months, with 43 boys. Between T1 and T2, CT increased by 15 percentiles in the intervention group, in contrast to a median 0 change in controls (P=0.03). For the other 3 LENA parameters (CV, AWC, TV), median change was zero, in both groups. Mean implant acceptability rating was 83%. Lexical reception scores correlated positively with CV (r=0.37, P<0.01), AWC (r=0.31, P<0.01) and CT (r=0.41, P<0.01) but not with TV (r=0.11, P=0.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LENA system can help parents optimize the child's language environment, and thus oral language development, particularly in young children.</p>","PeriodicalId":48834,"journal":{"name":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the language environment for children with cochlear implants, using the LENA language and environment analysis system - A CONSORT analysis.\",\"authors\":\"M Lathuilliere, I Prang, M-C Picot, V Macioce, M Mondain, N Loundon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anorl.2025.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the contribution of family counseling based on Language and Environment Analysis (LENA) recording data to improving the language environment of children with cochlear implants.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Cochlear implanted children with prelingual deafness were included from 2 French cochlear implant centers and randomized between 2 age-matched groups: intervention and control. LENA recording and lexical assessment (PPVT-R or GAEL-P) were performed at T1 and, 5 months later, T2. Between the two, intervention group families received feedback from the LENA recording and parental counseling.</p><p><strong>Endpoints: </strong>The main endpoint was improvement in language environment after LENA-based family counseling: adult word count (AWC), child vocalizations (CV), conversational turns (CT), and TV/media exposure (TV). Secondary endpoints comprised feasibility of LENA and the impact of the language environment on language reception (PPVT-R and GAEL-P scores).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-three of the 90 included children were analyzed. Mean age was 39±14.2 months, with 43 boys. Between T1 and T2, CT increased by 15 percentiles in the intervention group, in contrast to a median 0 change in controls (P=0.03). For the other 3 LENA parameters (CV, AWC, TV), median change was zero, in both groups. Mean implant acceptability rating was 83%. Lexical reception scores correlated positively with CV (r=0.37, P<0.01), AWC (r=0.31, P<0.01) and CT (r=0.41, P<0.01) but not with TV (r=0.11, P=0.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LENA system can help parents optimize the child's language environment, and thus oral language development, particularly in young children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2025.04.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2025.04.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价基于语言与环境分析(LENA)记录数据的家庭咨询对改善人工耳蜗儿童语言环境的贡献。材料与方法:从2个法国人工耳蜗中心选取植入人工耳蜗的语前耳聋患儿,随机分为干预组和对照组。在T1和5个月后T2分别进行LENA记录和词汇评估(PPVT-R或GAEL-P)。在这两者之间,干预组家庭从LENA记录和家长咨询中获得反馈。终点:主要终点是基于lena的家庭咨询后语言环境的改善:成人字数(AWC),儿童发声(CV),会话次数(CT)和电视/媒体曝光(TV)。次要终点包括LENA的可行性和语言环境对语言接受的影响(PPVT-R和GAEL-P评分)。结果:对90例患儿中的83例进行了分析。平均年龄39±14.2个月,男43例。在T1和T2之间,干预组的CT增加了15个百分位数,而对照组的中位数变化为0 (P=0.03)。对于其他3个LENA参数(CV、AWC、TV),两组的中位数变化均为零。平均种植体可接受率为83%。词汇接受得分与CV呈正相关(r=0.37, p)。结论:LENA系统可以帮助家长优化孩子的语言环境,从而促进口语发展,尤其是幼儿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the language environment for children with cochlear implants, using the LENA language and environment analysis system - A CONSORT analysis.

Objectives: To assess the contribution of family counseling based on Language and Environment Analysis (LENA) recording data to improving the language environment of children with cochlear implants.

Material and methods: Cochlear implanted children with prelingual deafness were included from 2 French cochlear implant centers and randomized between 2 age-matched groups: intervention and control. LENA recording and lexical assessment (PPVT-R or GAEL-P) were performed at T1 and, 5 months later, T2. Between the two, intervention group families received feedback from the LENA recording and parental counseling.

Endpoints: The main endpoint was improvement in language environment after LENA-based family counseling: adult word count (AWC), child vocalizations (CV), conversational turns (CT), and TV/media exposure (TV). Secondary endpoints comprised feasibility of LENA and the impact of the language environment on language reception (PPVT-R and GAEL-P scores).

Results: Eighty-three of the 90 included children were analyzed. Mean age was 39±14.2 months, with 43 boys. Between T1 and T2, CT increased by 15 percentiles in the intervention group, in contrast to a median 0 change in controls (P=0.03). For the other 3 LENA parameters (CV, AWC, TV), median change was zero, in both groups. Mean implant acceptability rating was 83%. Lexical reception scores correlated positively with CV (r=0.37, P<0.01), AWC (r=0.31, P<0.01) and CT (r=0.41, P<0.01) but not with TV (r=0.11, P=0.33).

Conclusion: The LENA system can help parents optimize the child's language environment, and thus oral language development, particularly in young children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
28.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
12 days
期刊介绍: European Annals of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck diseases heir of one of the oldest otorhinolaryngology journals in Europe is the official organ of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SFORL) and the the International Francophone Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SIFORL). Today six annual issues provide original peer reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches and review articles giving most up-to-date insights in all areas of otology, laryngology rhinology, head and neck surgery. The European Annals also publish the SFORL guidelines and recommendations.The journal is a unique two-armed publication: the European Annals (ANORL) is an English language well referenced online journal (e-only) whereas the Annales Françaises d’ORL (AFORL), mail-order paper and online edition in French language are aimed at the French-speaking community. French language teams must submit their articles in French to the AFORL site. Federating journal in its field, the European Annals has an Editorial board of experts with international reputation that allow to make an important contribution to communication on new research data and clinical practice by publishing high-quality articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信