我听不见你:鸣禽在噪音中的听觉处理。

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Journal of Experimental Biology Pub Date : 2025-05-15 Epub Date: 2025-05-22 DOI:10.1242/jeb.250033
Trina L Chou, Megan D Gall
{"title":"我听不见你:鸣禽在噪音中的听觉处理。","authors":"Trina L Chou, Megan D Gall","doi":"10.1242/jeb.250033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animals have evolved complex auditory systems to extract acoustic information from natural environmental noise, yet they are challenged by rising levels of novel anthropogenic noise. Songbirds adjust their vocal production in response to increasing noise, but auditory processing of signals in noise remains understudied. Auditory processing characteristics, including auditory filter bandwidth, filter efficiency and critical ratios (level-independent signal-to-noise ratios at threshold), likely influence auditory and behavioral responses to noise. Here, we investigated the effects of noise on auditory processing in three songbird species (black-capped chickadees, tufted titmice and white-breasted nuthatches) that live in mixed-species flocks and rely on heterospecific communication to coordinate mobbing behaviors. We determined masked thresholds and critical ratios from 1 to 4 kHz using auditory evoked potentials. We predicted that nuthatches would have the lowest critical ratios given that they have narrowest filters, followed by titmice and then chickadees. We found that nuthatches had the greatest sensitivity in quiet conditions, but the highest critical ratios, suggesting their auditory sensitivity is highly susceptible to noise. Titmice had the lowest critical ratios, suggesting relatively minor impacts of noise on their auditory processing. This is not consistent with predictions based on auditory filter bandwidth, but is consistent with both recent behavioral findings and predictions made by auditory filter efficiency measures. Detrimental effects of noise were most prevalent in the 2-4 kHz range, frequencies produced in vocalizations. Our results using the critical ratio as a measure of processing in noise suggest that low levels of anthropogenic noise may influence these three species differently.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"I can't hear you: effects of noise on auditory processing in mixed-species flocks.\",\"authors\":\"Trina L Chou, Megan D Gall\",\"doi\":\"10.1242/jeb.250033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Animals have evolved complex auditory systems to extract acoustic information from natural environmental noise, yet they are challenged by rising levels of novel anthropogenic noise. Songbirds adjust their vocal production in response to increasing noise, but auditory processing of signals in noise remains understudied. Auditory processing characteristics, including auditory filter bandwidth, filter efficiency and critical ratios (level-independent signal-to-noise ratios at threshold), likely influence auditory and behavioral responses to noise. Here, we investigated the effects of noise on auditory processing in three songbird species (black-capped chickadees, tufted titmice and white-breasted nuthatches) that live in mixed-species flocks and rely on heterospecific communication to coordinate mobbing behaviors. We determined masked thresholds and critical ratios from 1 to 4 kHz using auditory evoked potentials. We predicted that nuthatches would have the lowest critical ratios given that they have narrowest filters, followed by titmice and then chickadees. We found that nuthatches had the greatest sensitivity in quiet conditions, but the highest critical ratios, suggesting their auditory sensitivity is highly susceptible to noise. Titmice had the lowest critical ratios, suggesting relatively minor impacts of noise on their auditory processing. This is not consistent with predictions based on auditory filter bandwidth, but is consistent with both recent behavioral findings and predictions made by auditory filter efficiency measures. Detrimental effects of noise were most prevalent in the 2-4 kHz range, frequencies produced in vocalizations. Our results using the critical ratio as a measure of processing in noise suggest that low levels of anthropogenic noise may influence these three species differently.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.250033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.250033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动物已经进化出复杂的听觉系统来从自然环境噪声中提取声学信息,但它们正面临着不断上升的新型人为噪声水平的挑战。鸣禽会根据不断增加的噪音调整它们的声音,但噪音中信号的听觉处理仍未得到充分研究。听觉处理特征,包括听觉滤波器带宽、滤波效率和临界比率(阈值下与电平无关的信噪比)可能影响对噪声的听觉和行为反应。本文研究了噪声对三种鸣禽(黑冠山雀、簇毛山雀和白胸nuthches)听觉加工的影响,这三种鸣禽生活在混种鸟群中,依靠异种沟通来协调鸣禽行为。我们利用听觉诱发电位确定了1-4 kHz的屏蔽阈值和临界比率。我们预测,鉴于它们的过滤器最窄,nuhut的临界比率最低,其次是山雀,然后是山雀。我们发现,在安静的条件下,五口雀的灵敏度最高,但临界比率最高,这表明它们的听觉灵敏度极易受到噪音的影响。山雀的临界比率最低,表明噪音对其听觉处理的影响相对较小。这与基于听觉过滤器带宽的预测不一致,但与最近的行为发现和听觉过滤器效率测量的预测一致。噪音的有害影响在2-4千赫范围内最为普遍,这是发声时产生的频率。我们使用临界比率作为噪声处理的测量结果表明,低水平的人为噪声可能对这三种物种产生不同的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
I can't hear you: effects of noise on auditory processing in mixed-species flocks.

Animals have evolved complex auditory systems to extract acoustic information from natural environmental noise, yet they are challenged by rising levels of novel anthropogenic noise. Songbirds adjust their vocal production in response to increasing noise, but auditory processing of signals in noise remains understudied. Auditory processing characteristics, including auditory filter bandwidth, filter efficiency and critical ratios (level-independent signal-to-noise ratios at threshold), likely influence auditory and behavioral responses to noise. Here, we investigated the effects of noise on auditory processing in three songbird species (black-capped chickadees, tufted titmice and white-breasted nuthatches) that live in mixed-species flocks and rely on heterospecific communication to coordinate mobbing behaviors. We determined masked thresholds and critical ratios from 1 to 4 kHz using auditory evoked potentials. We predicted that nuthatches would have the lowest critical ratios given that they have narrowest filters, followed by titmice and then chickadees. We found that nuthatches had the greatest sensitivity in quiet conditions, but the highest critical ratios, suggesting their auditory sensitivity is highly susceptible to noise. Titmice had the lowest critical ratios, suggesting relatively minor impacts of noise on their auditory processing. This is not consistent with predictions based on auditory filter bandwidth, but is consistent with both recent behavioral findings and predictions made by auditory filter efficiency measures. Detrimental effects of noise were most prevalent in the 2-4 kHz range, frequencies produced in vocalizations. Our results using the critical ratio as a measure of processing in noise suggest that low levels of anthropogenic noise may influence these three species differently.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信