{"title":"细颗粒物暴露与癌症风险:前瞻性队列研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yuting Feng, Jiaoyuan Li, Yi Wang, Tongxin Yin, Qiankun Wang, Liming Cheng","doi":"10.1515/reveh-2024-0171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies examining the relationship between fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) exposure and cancer risk is inconclusive, with an evident scarcity of comprehensive data on the overall cancer risk. Given the emergence of new evidence, updated meta-analyses is essential. A search was performed on multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to Jan 2025. Hazard ratios (HRs), relative risks (RRs), or incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with their 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled. Moreover, a comprehensive and detailed quality assessment of the included studies was conducted to validate the plausibility of the findings. Overall, 57 original studies were included, covering 36 cancer categories and including overall cancer and malignancies specific to particular anatomical sites. For each increase of 10 μg per cubic meter in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration, there was an observed pooled HR of 1.07 for overall cancer (95 %CI:1.02-1.13). In the case of site-specific cancers, the pooled HRs were 1.11 (95 %CI:1.07-1.15), 1.06 (95 %CI:1.02-1.11), 1.17 (95 %CI:1.07-1.28), and 1.14 (95 %CI:1.03-1.26) for lung, breast, liver and esophageal cancers, respectively. Furthermore, PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure may potentially correlate with the risk of cancers at other anatomical locations including upper aerodigestive tract, oral cavity, kidney, skin, as well as digestive organs. In light of available evidence, it is inferred that PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure could potentially raise overall cancer risk with moderate certainty. As for site-specific malignancies, there is very low certainty evidence for lung cancer, low certainty evidence for breast cancer, and moderate certainty evidence for both liver and esophageal cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":21165,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on Environmental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fine particulate matter exposure and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.\",\"authors\":\"Yuting Feng, Jiaoyuan Li, Yi Wang, Tongxin Yin, Qiankun Wang, Liming Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/reveh-2024-0171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies examining the relationship between fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) exposure and cancer risk is inconclusive, with an evident scarcity of comprehensive data on the overall cancer risk. Given the emergence of new evidence, updated meta-analyses is essential. A search was performed on multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to Jan 2025. Hazard ratios (HRs), relative risks (RRs), or incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with their 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled. Moreover, a comprehensive and detailed quality assessment of the included studies was conducted to validate the plausibility of the findings. Overall, 57 original studies were included, covering 36 cancer categories and including overall cancer and malignancies specific to particular anatomical sites. For each increase of 10 μg per cubic meter in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration, there was an observed pooled HR of 1.07 for overall cancer (95 %CI:1.02-1.13). In the case of site-specific cancers, the pooled HRs were 1.11 (95 %CI:1.07-1.15), 1.06 (95 %CI:1.02-1.11), 1.17 (95 %CI:1.07-1.28), and 1.14 (95 %CI:1.03-1.26) for lung, breast, liver and esophageal cancers, respectively. Furthermore, PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure may potentially correlate with the risk of cancers at other anatomical locations including upper aerodigestive tract, oral cavity, kidney, skin, as well as digestive organs. In light of available evidence, it is inferred that PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure could potentially raise overall cancer risk with moderate certainty. As for site-specific malignancies, there is very low certainty evidence for lung cancer, low certainty evidence for breast cancer, and moderate certainty evidence for both liver and esophageal cancers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews on Environmental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews on Environmental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2024-0171\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2024-0171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
关于细颗粒物(PM2.5)暴露与癌症风险之间关系的研究尚无定论,显然缺乏有关整体癌症风险的综合数据。鉴于新证据的出现,更新元分析是必要的。检索了多个数据库,包括PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science和Cochrane Library,截止到2025年1月。提取风险比(hr)、相对风险比(RRs)或发病率比(IRRs)及其95% %置信区间(ci)并汇总。此外,对纳入的研究进行了全面和详细的质量评估,以验证研究结果的合理性。总共纳入了57项原始研究,涵盖了36种癌症类别,包括所有癌症和特定解剖部位的恶性肿瘤。PM2.5浓度每增加10 μg / m3,总体癌症的总风险比为1.07(95% %CI:1.02-1.13)。对于部位特异性癌症,肺癌、乳腺癌、肝癌和食管癌的合并hr分别为1.11(95 %CI:1.07-1.15)、1.06(95 %CI:1.02-1.11)、1.17(95 %CI:1.07-1.28)和1.14(95 %CI:1.03-1.26)。此外,PM2.5暴露可能与其他解剖部位的癌症风险相关,包括上气消化道、口腔、肾脏、皮肤和消化器官。根据现有证据,我们推断PM2.5暴露可能会增加总体癌症风险。至于部位特异性恶性肿瘤,肺癌的确定性证据非常低,乳腺癌的确定性证据很低,肝癌和食管癌的确定性证据中等。
Fine particulate matter exposure and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
Studies examining the relationship between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure and cancer risk is inconclusive, with an evident scarcity of comprehensive data on the overall cancer risk. Given the emergence of new evidence, updated meta-analyses is essential. A search was performed on multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to Jan 2025. Hazard ratios (HRs), relative risks (RRs), or incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with their 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled. Moreover, a comprehensive and detailed quality assessment of the included studies was conducted to validate the plausibility of the findings. Overall, 57 original studies were included, covering 36 cancer categories and including overall cancer and malignancies specific to particular anatomical sites. For each increase of 10 μg per cubic meter in PM2.5 concentration, there was an observed pooled HR of 1.07 for overall cancer (95 %CI:1.02-1.13). In the case of site-specific cancers, the pooled HRs were 1.11 (95 %CI:1.07-1.15), 1.06 (95 %CI:1.02-1.11), 1.17 (95 %CI:1.07-1.28), and 1.14 (95 %CI:1.03-1.26) for lung, breast, liver and esophageal cancers, respectively. Furthermore, PM2.5 exposure may potentially correlate with the risk of cancers at other anatomical locations including upper aerodigestive tract, oral cavity, kidney, skin, as well as digestive organs. In light of available evidence, it is inferred that PM2.5 exposure could potentially raise overall cancer risk with moderate certainty. As for site-specific malignancies, there is very low certainty evidence for lung cancer, low certainty evidence for breast cancer, and moderate certainty evidence for both liver and esophageal cancers.
期刊介绍:
Reviews on Environmental Health (REVEH) is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to fill the need for publication of review articles on hot topics in the field of environmental health. Reviews on Environmental Health aims to be an inspiring forum for scientists, environmentalists, physicians, engineers, and students who are concerned with aspects of human health, including quality of life, that are determined by physiological and psychosociological interactions between man and physical, chemical, biological, and social factors in the environment.
Reviews on Environmental Health is an important niche served by no other journal, that’s being a site where thoughtful reviews can be published on a variety of subjects related to both health and environment. One challenge is to bridge the research on environmental causes of disease with the clinical practice of medicine. Reviews on Environmental Health is a source of integrated information on environment and health subjects that will be of value to the broad scientific community, whether students, junior and senior professionals, or clinicians.