Claire van Vliet MD , Shyama U. Tetar MD, PhD , H.J.G. Desirée van den Bongard MD, PhD , Tamara Fraikin BSc , Marloes Jeulink BSc , Miguel A. Palacios PhD , M. Petrousjka van den Tol MD, PhD , Ben J. Slotman MD, PhD , Anna M.E. Bruynzeel MD, PhD
{"title":"低危乳腺癌部分乳房放疗采用mri引导的适应性方法II期PARLOB研究的结果。","authors":"Claire van Vliet MD , Shyama U. Tetar MD, PhD , H.J.G. Desirée van den Bongard MD, PhD , Tamara Fraikin BSc , Marloes Jeulink BSc , Miguel A. Palacios PhD , M. Petrousjka van den Tol MD, PhD , Ben J. Slotman MD, PhD , Anna M.E. Bruynzeel MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2025.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The majority of patients with breast cancer are treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by postoperative whole or partial breast irradiation (PBI). Previous studies on PBI demonstrated similar ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences compared with whole breast irradiation, however, conflicting data on toxicity and cosmetic outcomes were reported. This study investigates the feasibility of stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for PBI, with emphasis on toxicity and cosmetic outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Patients with low-risk breast cancer suitable for PBI as defined by European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology guidelines were included. SMART was delivered in supine position in a 2-week course of 5 fractions of 6 Gy, or 6.5 Gy in case of high risk characteristics. Patient- and physician-reported toxicity and cosmetic outcomes were scored at 3, 9, 18, and 36 months postoperatively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between 2017 and 2020, 50 patients were included and 45 patients were treated with SMART. Median age was 66 years, median tumor size was 1.2 cm. Most tumors were Bloom Richardson grade 1 (55.6%) and estrogen receptor positive (95.6%). The majority did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy (80%). The highest grade acute toxicity was grade 2 in 20%, mostly fatigue. At 18 months, 4 patients (9%) reported grade 2 toxicity, consisting of fibrosis and fatigue. No grade ≥3 toxicity was recorded. At 9 and 18 months, 86.4% of patients were (very) satisfied with the cosmetic outcome. The cosmetic outcome was good-excellent compared with the contralateral breast at 18 months in 90.9% and 73.8% as scored by patients and physicians, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive PBI for patients with low-risk breast cancer was feasible and resulted in low rates of toxicity. Good cosmetic outcomes were reported by patients after a follow-up of 18 months.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":"15 5","pages":"Pages e434-e443"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partial Breast Radiation Therapy in Low-Risk Breast Cancer Using a Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Adaptive Approach; Results of the Phase 2 PARLOB Study\",\"authors\":\"Claire van Vliet MD , Shyama U. Tetar MD, PhD , H.J.G. Desirée van den Bongard MD, PhD , Tamara Fraikin BSc , Marloes Jeulink BSc , Miguel A. Palacios PhD , M. Petrousjka van den Tol MD, PhD , Ben J. Slotman MD, PhD , Anna M.E. Bruynzeel MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prro.2025.03.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The majority of patients with breast cancer are treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by postoperative whole or partial breast irradiation (PBI). Previous studies on PBI demonstrated similar ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences compared with whole breast irradiation, however, conflicting data on toxicity and cosmetic outcomes were reported. This study investigates the feasibility of stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for PBI, with emphasis on toxicity and cosmetic outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Patients with low-risk breast cancer suitable for PBI as defined by European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology guidelines were included. SMART was delivered in supine position in a 2-week course of 5 fractions of 6 Gy, or 6.5 Gy in case of high risk characteristics. Patient- and physician-reported toxicity and cosmetic outcomes were scored at 3, 9, 18, and 36 months postoperatively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between 2017 and 2020, 50 patients were included and 45 patients were treated with SMART. Median age was 66 years, median tumor size was 1.2 cm. Most tumors were Bloom Richardson grade 1 (55.6%) and estrogen receptor positive (95.6%). The majority did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy (80%). The highest grade acute toxicity was grade 2 in 20%, mostly fatigue. At 18 months, 4 patients (9%) reported grade 2 toxicity, consisting of fibrosis and fatigue. No grade ≥3 toxicity was recorded. At 9 and 18 months, 86.4% of patients were (very) satisfied with the cosmetic outcome. The cosmetic outcome was good-excellent compared with the contralateral breast at 18 months in 90.9% and 73.8% as scored by patients and physicians, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive PBI for patients with low-risk breast cancer was feasible and resulted in low rates of toxicity. Good cosmetic outcomes were reported by patients after a follow-up of 18 months.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages e434-e443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879850025000980\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879850025000980","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Partial Breast Radiation Therapy in Low-Risk Breast Cancer Using a Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Adaptive Approach; Results of the Phase 2 PARLOB Study
Purpose
The majority of patients with breast cancer are treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by postoperative whole or partial breast irradiation (PBI). Previous studies on PBI demonstrated similar ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences compared with whole breast irradiation, however, conflicting data on toxicity and cosmetic outcomes were reported. This study investigates the feasibility of stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for PBI, with emphasis on toxicity and cosmetic outcomes.
Methods and Materials
Patients with low-risk breast cancer suitable for PBI as defined by European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology guidelines were included. SMART was delivered in supine position in a 2-week course of 5 fractions of 6 Gy, or 6.5 Gy in case of high risk characteristics. Patient- and physician-reported toxicity and cosmetic outcomes were scored at 3, 9, 18, and 36 months postoperatively.
Results
Between 2017 and 2020, 50 patients were included and 45 patients were treated with SMART. Median age was 66 years, median tumor size was 1.2 cm. Most tumors were Bloom Richardson grade 1 (55.6%) and estrogen receptor positive (95.6%). The majority did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy (80%). The highest grade acute toxicity was grade 2 in 20%, mostly fatigue. At 18 months, 4 patients (9%) reported grade 2 toxicity, consisting of fibrosis and fatigue. No grade ≥3 toxicity was recorded. At 9 and 18 months, 86.4% of patients were (very) satisfied with the cosmetic outcome. The cosmetic outcome was good-excellent compared with the contralateral breast at 18 months in 90.9% and 73.8% as scored by patients and physicians, respectively.
Conclusions
Stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive PBI for patients with low-risk breast cancer was feasible and resulted in low rates of toxicity. Good cosmetic outcomes were reported by patients after a follow-up of 18 months.
期刊介绍:
The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes:
Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives
Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues
ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements
Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.