硬膜外镇痛患者术后低血压预后模型的建立和验证。

IF 1.1 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Carlos E Guerra-Londono, Erika Taco Vasquez, Efrain Riveros, Ehsan Noori, David Greiver, Srikanth Pillai, Theodore Schiff, James Soetedjo, Maylyn Wu, Jaime Garzon Serrano
{"title":"硬膜外镇痛患者术后低血压预后模型的建立和验证。","authors":"Carlos E Guerra-Londono, Erika Taco Vasquez, Efrain Riveros, Ehsan Noori, David Greiver, Srikanth Pillai, Theodore Schiff, James Soetedjo, Maylyn Wu, Jaime Garzon Serrano","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_88_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Postoperative hypotension is common in adults receiving epidural analgesia. Although risk factors have been reported in the literature, prognostic models have not been developed or validated. We aimed to develop and validate a multivariable, prognostic model for postoperative hypotension in patients receiving epidural analgesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrieved retrospective cohort data of adults undergoing abdominal or thoracic surgery at five hospitals between 2014 and 2023 who received epidural analgesia for at least 24 hours after surgery. A systematic literature search helped define <i>a priori</i> candidate exposures. The primary outcome was postoperative hypotension during the first 72 hours after surgery. Multiple logistic regression was performed to evaluate a multivariable model. Exposures identified as statistically significant were used for logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, and decision-tree model of random forest. Classification error was used to compare models, and variable importance was used for random forest analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 829 participants were included. The incidence of postoperative hypotension was 38.8%. Multivariable analysis identified the following independent prognostic factors: male sex, white race, body mass index, intraoperative hypotension, use of arterial line, bupivacaine concentration of 0.125% (vs. lower concentrations), and anesthesia duration. The error misclassification rate was 67% for multiple logistic regression, 27% for linear discriminant analysis, and 33.4% for random forest model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using retrospective cohort data, a prognostic model of hypotension produced the best performance results using linear discriminant analysis, with an error misclassification rate of 27%. Further studies are required to perform model optimization for future clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"41 2","pages":"286-291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a prognostic model for postoperative hypotension in patients receiving epidural analgesia.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos E Guerra-Londono, Erika Taco Vasquez, Efrain Riveros, Ehsan Noori, David Greiver, Srikanth Pillai, Theodore Schiff, James Soetedjo, Maylyn Wu, Jaime Garzon Serrano\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joacp.joacp_88_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Postoperative hypotension is common in adults receiving epidural analgesia. Although risk factors have been reported in the literature, prognostic models have not been developed or validated. We aimed to develop and validate a multivariable, prognostic model for postoperative hypotension in patients receiving epidural analgesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrieved retrospective cohort data of adults undergoing abdominal or thoracic surgery at five hospitals between 2014 and 2023 who received epidural analgesia for at least 24 hours after surgery. A systematic literature search helped define <i>a priori</i> candidate exposures. The primary outcome was postoperative hypotension during the first 72 hours after surgery. Multiple logistic regression was performed to evaluate a multivariable model. Exposures identified as statistically significant were used for logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, and decision-tree model of random forest. Classification error was used to compare models, and variable importance was used for random forest analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 829 participants were included. The incidence of postoperative hypotension was 38.8%. Multivariable analysis identified the following independent prognostic factors: male sex, white race, body mass index, intraoperative hypotension, use of arterial line, bupivacaine concentration of 0.125% (vs. lower concentrations), and anesthesia duration. The error misclassification rate was 67% for multiple logistic regression, 27% for linear discriminant analysis, and 33.4% for random forest model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using retrospective cohort data, a prognostic model of hypotension produced the best performance results using linear discriminant analysis, with an error misclassification rate of 27%. Further studies are required to perform model optimization for future clinical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"286-291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002708/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_88_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_88_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:术后低血压在接受硬膜外镇痛的成人中很常见。虽然危险因素已在文献中报道,预后模型尚未开发或验证。我们的目的是开发和验证一个多变量的预后模型,用于接受硬膜外镇痛的患者术后低血压。材料和方法:我们检索了2014年至2023年间在五家医院接受腹部或胸部手术且术后至少24小时接受硬膜外镇痛的成人的回顾性队列数据。系统的文献检索有助于确定先验的候选暴露。主要结局是术后72小时内的低血压。采用多元逻辑回归对多变量模型进行评价。发现具有统计学意义的暴露被用于逻辑回归、线性判别分析和随机森林决策树模型。用分类误差比较模型,用变量重要度进行随机森林分析。结果:共纳入829名受试者。术后低血压发生率为38.8%。多变量分析确定了以下独立预后因素:男性、白人、体重指数、术中低血压、动脉导管使用、布比卡因浓度0.125%(相对于较低浓度)和麻醉时间。多元逻辑回归的误分类率为67%,线性判别分析的误分类率为27%,随机森林模型的误分类率为33.4%。结论:采用回顾性队列数据,采用线性判别分析,低血压预后模型的表现最佳,误判率为27%。需要进一步的研究来为未来的临床应用进行模型优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development and validation of a prognostic model for postoperative hypotension in patients receiving epidural analgesia.

Development and validation of a prognostic model for postoperative hypotension in patients receiving epidural analgesia.

Development and validation of a prognostic model for postoperative hypotension in patients receiving epidural analgesia.

Background and aims: Postoperative hypotension is common in adults receiving epidural analgesia. Although risk factors have been reported in the literature, prognostic models have not been developed or validated. We aimed to develop and validate a multivariable, prognostic model for postoperative hypotension in patients receiving epidural analgesia.

Material and methods: We retrieved retrospective cohort data of adults undergoing abdominal or thoracic surgery at five hospitals between 2014 and 2023 who received epidural analgesia for at least 24 hours after surgery. A systematic literature search helped define a priori candidate exposures. The primary outcome was postoperative hypotension during the first 72 hours after surgery. Multiple logistic regression was performed to evaluate a multivariable model. Exposures identified as statistically significant were used for logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, and decision-tree model of random forest. Classification error was used to compare models, and variable importance was used for random forest analysis.

Results: In total, 829 participants were included. The incidence of postoperative hypotension was 38.8%. Multivariable analysis identified the following independent prognostic factors: male sex, white race, body mass index, intraoperative hypotension, use of arterial line, bupivacaine concentration of 0.125% (vs. lower concentrations), and anesthesia duration. The error misclassification rate was 67% for multiple logistic regression, 27% for linear discriminant analysis, and 33.4% for random forest model.

Conclusion: Using retrospective cohort data, a prognostic model of hypotension produced the best performance results using linear discriminant analysis, with an error misclassification rate of 27%. Further studies are required to perform model optimization for future clinical use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信