[国际药学期刊编辑合作组织(ICPJE)正式成立,旨在提高临床和社会药学实践研究出版物的质量]。

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Farmaceuticos Comunitarios Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-04-15 DOI:10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2025).08
F Alves Da Costa, F Fernandez-Llimos, S Desselle, I Arnet, Z Babar, Ch Bond, M Cordina, V Garcia Cardenas, M El Hajj, R Jacobsen, A W Law, L S Nørgaard, C Polidori, N Shcherbakova, D Stewart, F S Tonin, A E Weidmann
{"title":"[国际药学期刊编辑合作组织(ICPJE)正式成立,旨在提高临床和社会药学实践研究出版物的质量]。","authors":"F Alves Da Costa, F Fernandez-Llimos, S Desselle, I Arnet, Z Babar, Ch Bond, M Cordina, V Garcia Cardenas, M El Hajj, R Jacobsen, A W Law, L S Nørgaard, C Polidori, N Shcherbakova, D Stewart, F S Tonin, A E Weidmann","doi":"10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2025).08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Resumen: </strong>The Granada statements were a result of the need to strengthen clinical, social and administrative pharmacy practice as an area of knowledge that translates into practice, research and policy. As a re-sponse, a group of clinical and social pharmacy practice journal editors launched an initiative in Grana-da in 2022 to discuss ways to improve the quality of publications in this area, which culminated in the Granada statements. Eighteen statements were developed, clustered into six main domains:1) the ap-propriate use of terminology; 2) developing impactful abstracts; 3) having the required peer reviews; 4) preventing journal scattering; 5) more effective and wiser use of journal and article performance met-rics; and 6) authors' selection of the most appropriate pharmacy practice journal to submit their work.The full Granada statements have been published in 14 journals.(1-14) These pioneering statements are rooted in similar endeavors undertaken by scholars in other health professions groups, fostering the concept of interdisciplinary consensus and advancing scientific paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":40648,"journal":{"name":"Farmaceuticos Comunitarios","volume":"17 2","pages":"5-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The International Collaboration of Pharmacy Journal Editors (ICPJE) formally constituted to foster quality around clinical and social pharmacy practice research publications].\",\"authors\":\"F Alves Da Costa, F Fernandez-Llimos, S Desselle, I Arnet, Z Babar, Ch Bond, M Cordina, V Garcia Cardenas, M El Hajj, R Jacobsen, A W Law, L S Nørgaard, C Polidori, N Shcherbakova, D Stewart, F S Tonin, A E Weidmann\",\"doi\":\"10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2025).08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Resumen: </strong>The Granada statements were a result of the need to strengthen clinical, social and administrative pharmacy practice as an area of knowledge that translates into practice, research and policy. As a re-sponse, a group of clinical and social pharmacy practice journal editors launched an initiative in Grana-da in 2022 to discuss ways to improve the quality of publications in this area, which culminated in the Granada statements. Eighteen statements were developed, clustered into six main domains:1) the ap-propriate use of terminology; 2) developing impactful abstracts; 3) having the required peer reviews; 4) preventing journal scattering; 5) more effective and wiser use of journal and article performance met-rics; and 6) authors' selection of the most appropriate pharmacy practice journal to submit their work.The full Granada statements have been published in 14 journals.(1-14) These pioneering statements are rooted in similar endeavors undertaken by scholars in other health professions groups, fostering the concept of interdisciplinary consensus and advancing scientific paradigm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmaceuticos Comunitarios\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"5-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020980/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmaceuticos Comunitarios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2025).08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmaceuticos Comunitarios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2025).08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简历:格拉纳达声明是需要加强临床,社会和行政药学实践的知识领域转化为实践,研究和政策的结果。作为回应,一组临床和社会药学实践期刊编辑于2022年在格拉纳达发起了一项倡议,讨论如何提高该领域出版物的质量,最终在格拉纳达声明中达到高潮。共提出了18项声明,分为6个主要领域:1)恰当地使用术语;2)撰写有影响力的摘要;3)进行必要的同行评审;4)防止轴颈散射;5)更有效、更明智地使用期刊和文章绩效指标;6)作者选择最合适的药学实践期刊投稿。完整的格拉纳达声明已经发表在14种期刊上。(1-14)这些开创性的声明植根于其他健康专业团体的学者所做的类似努力,促进了跨学科共识的概念和推进科学范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The International Collaboration of Pharmacy Journal Editors (ICPJE) formally constituted to foster quality around clinical and social pharmacy practice research publications].

Resumen: The Granada statements were a result of the need to strengthen clinical, social and administrative pharmacy practice as an area of knowledge that translates into practice, research and policy. As a re-sponse, a group of clinical and social pharmacy practice journal editors launched an initiative in Grana-da in 2022 to discuss ways to improve the quality of publications in this area, which culminated in the Granada statements. Eighteen statements were developed, clustered into six main domains:1) the ap-propriate use of terminology; 2) developing impactful abstracts; 3) having the required peer reviews; 4) preventing journal scattering; 5) more effective and wiser use of journal and article performance met-rics; and 6) authors' selection of the most appropriate pharmacy practice journal to submit their work.The full Granada statements have been published in 14 journals.(1-14) These pioneering statements are rooted in similar endeavors undertaken by scholars in other health professions groups, fostering the concept of interdisciplinary consensus and advancing scientific paradigm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Farmaceuticos Comunitarios
Farmaceuticos Comunitarios HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
351
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信