腰椎骨盆内固定中髂骨螺钉置入的ct解剖与临床分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
In vivo Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13951
Carina Fritzsche, Samy Mahjoub, Tobias Hüfner, Stephan Sehmisch, Sebastian Decker
{"title":"腰椎骨盆内固定中髂骨螺钉置入的ct解剖与临床分析。","authors":"Carina Fritzsche, Samy Mahjoub, Tobias Hüfner, Stephan Sehmisch, Sebastian Decker","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Iliac screws provide strong caudal anchorage for both long spinal fusions as well as short lumbopelvic fixations. However, anatomic based placement can be challenging, and complication rates are often underestimated.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We analysed 47 iliac screws being placed in 24 patients. Using postoperative computed tomography (CT), iliac screw placement was analysed with reference to anatomic landmarks. Iliac narrowings were described with regard to their relevance for iliac screw placement. Moreover, we analyzed clinical records for clinical complications. The latter were classified as intraoperative, postoperative, and radiological.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From starting points, described by distance to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), the average iliac screw length was 71.2±13.7 mm, and the diameter was as wide as 7.9±0.7 mm. Divergence was 30.7±12.6° (transverse plane) and caudal orientation was 34.2±13.0° (sagittal orientation). General pelvic dimensions correlated significantly with each other, and certainly with the length of implanted screws. Different adverse events and complications occurred. A total of 20% of patients were found with at least partial extracortical malpositioning. The main group of complications were postoperative with painful prominence in 20% of cases, wound infection in 8.9% and wound healing disorders in 6.7%. Further complications were radiological screw loosening (11.1%). No complications were detected in 33.3% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimal iliac screw size relative to the individual anatomy in general is not achieved. In most cases compared to the literature, iliac screw dimensions could be both longer and thicker. Perfect anatomic placement can be challenging, which highlights the need for individual preoperative CT-based surgical planning to achieve a strong caudal anchorage in lumbopelvic fixations. In general, the diameter seems to be more important than the screw length.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"39 3","pages":"1514-1523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CT-based Anatomic and Clinical Analysis of Iliac Screw Placement During Spinopelvic Fixation.\",\"authors\":\"Carina Fritzsche, Samy Mahjoub, Tobias Hüfner, Stephan Sehmisch, Sebastian Decker\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/invivo.13951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Iliac screws provide strong caudal anchorage for both long spinal fusions as well as short lumbopelvic fixations. However, anatomic based placement can be challenging, and complication rates are often underestimated.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We analysed 47 iliac screws being placed in 24 patients. Using postoperative computed tomography (CT), iliac screw placement was analysed with reference to anatomic landmarks. Iliac narrowings were described with regard to their relevance for iliac screw placement. Moreover, we analyzed clinical records for clinical complications. The latter were classified as intraoperative, postoperative, and radiological.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From starting points, described by distance to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), the average iliac screw length was 71.2±13.7 mm, and the diameter was as wide as 7.9±0.7 mm. Divergence was 30.7±12.6° (transverse plane) and caudal orientation was 34.2±13.0° (sagittal orientation). General pelvic dimensions correlated significantly with each other, and certainly with the length of implanted screws. Different adverse events and complications occurred. A total of 20% of patients were found with at least partial extracortical malpositioning. The main group of complications were postoperative with painful prominence in 20% of cases, wound infection in 8.9% and wound healing disorders in 6.7%. Further complications were radiological screw loosening (11.1%). No complications were detected in 33.3% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimal iliac screw size relative to the individual anatomy in general is not achieved. In most cases compared to the literature, iliac screw dimensions could be both longer and thicker. Perfect anatomic placement can be challenging, which highlights the need for individual preoperative CT-based surgical planning to achieve a strong caudal anchorage in lumbopelvic fixations. In general, the diameter seems to be more important than the screw length.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In vivo\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"1514-1523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042005/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In vivo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13951\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13951","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:髂螺钉为长脊柱融合和短腰骨盆固定提供强大的尾侧锚固。然而,基于解剖的放置是具有挑战性的,并发症的发生率往往被低估。患者和方法:我们分析了24例患者置入的47枚髂螺钉。通过术后计算机断层扫描(CT),参考解剖标志分析髂螺钉置入。我们描述了髂狭窄与髂螺钉置入的相关性。此外,我们还分析了临床并发症的临床记录。后者分为术中、术后和放射学。结果:以距髂后上棘(PSIS)的距离为起点,髂螺钉平均长度为71.2±13.7 mm,直径为7.9±0.7 mm。散度为30.7±12.6°(横切面),尾侧为34.2±13.0°(矢状面)。骨盆总体尺寸之间存在显著相关性,当然也与植入螺钉的长度相关。发生了不同的不良事件和并发症。总共有20%的患者被发现至少有部分皮质外错位。主要并发症组为术后疼痛突出(20%)、伤口感染(8.9%)和伤口愈合障碍(6.7%)。其他并发症为放射学螺钉松动(11.1%)。33.3%的患者未发现并发症。结论:相对于个体解剖结构而言,髂螺钉的大小并没有达到最佳。与文献相比,在大多数情况下,髂螺钉的尺寸可以更长和更厚。完美的解剖位置可能是具有挑战性的,这突出了需要单独的术前基于ct的手术计划,以实现腰盆腔固定的强尾侧锚固。一般来说,直径似乎比螺杆长度更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CT-based Anatomic and Clinical Analysis of Iliac Screw Placement During Spinopelvic Fixation.

Background/aim: Iliac screws provide strong caudal anchorage for both long spinal fusions as well as short lumbopelvic fixations. However, anatomic based placement can be challenging, and complication rates are often underestimated.

Patients and methods: We analysed 47 iliac screws being placed in 24 patients. Using postoperative computed tomography (CT), iliac screw placement was analysed with reference to anatomic landmarks. Iliac narrowings were described with regard to their relevance for iliac screw placement. Moreover, we analyzed clinical records for clinical complications. The latter were classified as intraoperative, postoperative, and radiological.

Results: From starting points, described by distance to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), the average iliac screw length was 71.2±13.7 mm, and the diameter was as wide as 7.9±0.7 mm. Divergence was 30.7±12.6° (transverse plane) and caudal orientation was 34.2±13.0° (sagittal orientation). General pelvic dimensions correlated significantly with each other, and certainly with the length of implanted screws. Different adverse events and complications occurred. A total of 20% of patients were found with at least partial extracortical malpositioning. The main group of complications were postoperative with painful prominence in 20% of cases, wound infection in 8.9% and wound healing disorders in 6.7%. Further complications were radiological screw loosening (11.1%). No complications were detected in 33.3% of patients.

Conclusion: Optimal iliac screw size relative to the individual anatomy in general is not achieved. In most cases compared to the literature, iliac screw dimensions could be both longer and thicker. Perfect anatomic placement can be challenging, which highlights the need for individual preoperative CT-based surgical planning to achieve a strong caudal anchorage in lumbopelvic fixations. In general, the diameter seems to be more important than the screw length.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信