医疗保健服务效率评估的三十年:马来西亚卫生部的数据包络分析(DEA)。

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
M Zulfakhar Zubir, Aizuddin A N, Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf, A Aziz Harith, M Ihsanuddin Abas, Maizatul Izyami Kayat, M Firdaus M Radi, Mas Norehan Merican, Nurcholisah Fitra, Affendi M Ali, Sharifah Ain Shameera Syed Rusli
{"title":"医疗保健服务效率评估的三十年:马来西亚卫生部的数据包络分析(DEA)。","authors":"M Zulfakhar Zubir, Aizuddin A N, Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf, A Aziz Harith, M Ihsanuddin Abas, Maizatul Izyami Kayat, M Firdaus M Radi, Mas Norehan Merican, Nurcholisah Fitra, Affendi M Ali, Sharifah Ain Shameera Syed Rusli","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00624-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the most important ways to boost the health system's performance and lower the rising cost of healthcare is to increase its efficiency. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of the MOH in providing public health services and to gauge the progress of health plans in Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three output variables (number of admissions, number of outpatient attendances, and number of maternal and child health attendances) and six input variables (budget allocation, number of doctors, dentists, pharmacists, nurses, and community nurses) were used in a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Window Analysis. Eight input-output models' bias-corrected efficiency scores were obtained using bootstrapping.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ministry level in public health service.</p><p><strong>Participant: </strong>28 Decision making units (DMUs) from 1995 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Robust performance over the study period was shown by the mean bias-corrected efficiency score of 0.974 (95% CI: 0.907-0.989) under the Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) model. Lower Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) model scores, on the other hand, draw attention to scale-level inefficiencies. During the COVID-19 pandemic, efficiency decreased due to higher input demands and limited outputs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although MOH has attained a high level of technological efficiency, expanding operations and resolving inequalities in rural areas remain difficult. Targeted tactics including telemedicine adoption, resource redistribution, and a move towards preventive treatment are advised in order to improve fairness and resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11987374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three decades in healthcare service efficiency evaluation: a bootstrapping Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) of Ministry of Health Malaysia.\",\"authors\":\"M Zulfakhar Zubir, Aizuddin A N, Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf, A Aziz Harith, M Ihsanuddin Abas, Maizatul Izyami Kayat, M Firdaus M Radi, Mas Norehan Merican, Nurcholisah Fitra, Affendi M Ali, Sharifah Ain Shameera Syed Rusli\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13561-025-00624-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the most important ways to boost the health system's performance and lower the rising cost of healthcare is to increase its efficiency. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of the MOH in providing public health services and to gauge the progress of health plans in Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three output variables (number of admissions, number of outpatient attendances, and number of maternal and child health attendances) and six input variables (budget allocation, number of doctors, dentists, pharmacists, nurses, and community nurses) were used in a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Window Analysis. Eight input-output models' bias-corrected efficiency scores were obtained using bootstrapping.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ministry level in public health service.</p><p><strong>Participant: </strong>28 Decision making units (DMUs) from 1995 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Robust performance over the study period was shown by the mean bias-corrected efficiency score of 0.974 (95% CI: 0.907-0.989) under the Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) model. Lower Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) model scores, on the other hand, draw attention to scale-level inefficiencies. During the COVID-19 pandemic, efficiency decreased due to higher input demands and limited outputs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although MOH has attained a high level of technological efficiency, expanding operations and resolving inequalities in rural areas remain difficult. Targeted tactics including telemedicine adoption, resource redistribution, and a move towards preventive treatment are advised in order to improve fairness and resilience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11987374/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00624-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00624-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:提高卫生系统的绩效和降低医疗保健成本的最重要的途径之一是提高其效率。这项研究的目的是评估卫生部在提供公共卫生服务方面的效率,并衡量马来西亚卫生计划的进展情况。方法:采用数据包络分析(DEA)窗口分析,采用3个输出变量(入院人数、门诊人数和妇幼保健人数)和6个输入变量(预算分配、医生、牙医、药剂师、护士和社区护士人数)。采用自举法获得了8个投入产出模型的偏差校正效率得分。背景:公共卫生服务部级。参与者:28个决策单位(dmu), 1995 - 2022年。结果:在可变规模回报(VRS)模型下,偏差校正后的平均效率评分为0.974 (95% CI: 0.907-0.989),显示了研究期间的稳健表现。另一方面,较低的规模恒定回报(CRS)模型得分,引起了对规模水平效率低下的关注。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,由于投入需求增加和产出有限,效率下降。结论:尽管卫生部已经达到了很高的技术效率水平,但扩大业务和解决农村地区的不平等仍然很困难。建议采取有针对性的策略,包括采用远程医疗、资源再分配和转向预防性治疗,以提高公平性和复原力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three decades in healthcare service efficiency evaluation: a bootstrapping Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) of Ministry of Health Malaysia.

Background: One of the most important ways to boost the health system's performance and lower the rising cost of healthcare is to increase its efficiency. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of the MOH in providing public health services and to gauge the progress of health plans in Malaysia.

Methods: Three output variables (number of admissions, number of outpatient attendances, and number of maternal and child health attendances) and six input variables (budget allocation, number of doctors, dentists, pharmacists, nurses, and community nurses) were used in a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Window Analysis. Eight input-output models' bias-corrected efficiency scores were obtained using bootstrapping.

Setting: Ministry level in public health service.

Participant: 28 Decision making units (DMUs) from 1995 to 2022.

Results: Robust performance over the study period was shown by the mean bias-corrected efficiency score of 0.974 (95% CI: 0.907-0.989) under the Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) model. Lower Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) model scores, on the other hand, draw attention to scale-level inefficiencies. During the COVID-19 pandemic, efficiency decreased due to higher input demands and limited outputs.

Conclusions: Although MOH has attained a high level of technological efficiency, expanding operations and resolving inequalities in rural areas remain difficult. Targeted tactics including telemedicine adoption, resource redistribution, and a move towards preventive treatment are advised in order to improve fairness and resilience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信