非熏蒸性杀线虫剂对亚致死剂量的肠绵线虫、佛罗里达绵线虫、haplanaria和incognita的差异反应。

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Phytopathology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-29 DOI:10.1094/PHYTO-01-25-0028-R
Nabin Poudel, Richard F Davis, Paul M Severns, Theodore McAvoy, Ganapati B Jagdale, Timothy B Brenneman, Intiaz A Chowdhury
{"title":"非熏蒸性杀线虫剂对亚致死剂量的肠绵线虫、佛罗里达绵线虫、haplanaria和incognita的差异反应。","authors":"Nabin Poudel, Richard F Davis, Paul M Severns, Theodore McAvoy, Ganapati B Jagdale, Timothy B Brenneman, Intiaz A Chowdhury","doi":"10.1094/PHYTO-01-25-0028-R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Root-knot nematodes (RKNs; <i>Meloidogyne</i> spp.) are among the most widespread and damaging plant-parasitic nematodes known. Although <i>M. incognita</i> is the most prevalent RKN species, other species, including <i>M. enterolobii</i>, <i>M. floridensis</i>, and <i>M. haplanaria</i>, have recently been detected in multiple Georgia, United States, vegetable fields. Producers use chemical nematicides to manage <i>M. incognita</i> populations because most vegetable crops do not have effective RKN host resistance. We evaluated the effects of sublethal doses of nonfumigant nematicides-fluazaindolizine, fluensulfone, fluopyram, and oxamyl-on motility, egg hatching, and reproduction of these four RKN species. In vitro behavioral response assays revealed significant variation in motility between species, with <i>M. enterolobii</i> being the less sensitive to the evaluated nematicides. RKN population response in greenhouse conditions indicated that all the nematicides impaired the reproduction of the evaluated <i>Meloidogyne</i> species. Whereas most nematicides displayed a strong effect on reducing the egg hatching, fluazaindolizine appeared to have a poor effect on suppressing the egg hatching across all RKN species. No differences were observed among <i>Meloidogyne</i> species in their egg-hatching responses to nematicides. In this study, we conducted the first comprehensive evaluation of these nematicides on motility, reproduction, and egg hatching in these RKN species. This study enhances our understanding of the species-specific responses of different <i>Meloidogyne</i> spp. to nonfumigant nematicides.</p>","PeriodicalId":20410,"journal":{"name":"Phytopathology","volume":" ","pages":"1215-1222"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Response of <i>Meloidogyne enterolobii</i>, <i>M. floridensis</i>, <i>M. haplanaria</i>, and <i>M. incognita</i> to Sublethal Doses of Nonfumigant Nematicides.\",\"authors\":\"Nabin Poudel, Richard F Davis, Paul M Severns, Theodore McAvoy, Ganapati B Jagdale, Timothy B Brenneman, Intiaz A Chowdhury\",\"doi\":\"10.1094/PHYTO-01-25-0028-R\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Root-knot nematodes (RKNs; <i>Meloidogyne</i> spp.) are among the most widespread and damaging plant-parasitic nematodes known. Although <i>M. incognita</i> is the most prevalent RKN species, other species, including <i>M. enterolobii</i>, <i>M. floridensis</i>, and <i>M. haplanaria</i>, have recently been detected in multiple Georgia, United States, vegetable fields. Producers use chemical nematicides to manage <i>M. incognita</i> populations because most vegetable crops do not have effective RKN host resistance. We evaluated the effects of sublethal doses of nonfumigant nematicides-fluazaindolizine, fluensulfone, fluopyram, and oxamyl-on motility, egg hatching, and reproduction of these four RKN species. In vitro behavioral response assays revealed significant variation in motility between species, with <i>M. enterolobii</i> being the less sensitive to the evaluated nematicides. RKN population response in greenhouse conditions indicated that all the nematicides impaired the reproduction of the evaluated <i>Meloidogyne</i> species. Whereas most nematicides displayed a strong effect on reducing the egg hatching, fluazaindolizine appeared to have a poor effect on suppressing the egg hatching across all RKN species. No differences were observed among <i>Meloidogyne</i> species in their egg-hatching responses to nematicides. In this study, we conducted the first comprehensive evaluation of these nematicides on motility, reproduction, and egg hatching in these RKN species. This study enhances our understanding of the species-specific responses of different <i>Meloidogyne</i> spp. to nonfumigant nematicides.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phytopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1215-1222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-01-25-0028-R\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-01-25-0028-R","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根结线虫;丝状线虫属(Meloidogyne spp.)是已知分布最广、危害最大的植物寄生线虫之一。虽然不知名M. incognita是最常见的RKN种,但最近在美国佐治亚州的多个菜地中也发现了其他种,包括肠氏M.、佛罗里达氏M.和haplanaria。生产者使用化学杀线虫剂来管理黑僵菌种群,因为大多数蔬菜作物没有有效的抗RKN宿主能力。我们评估了亚致死剂量的非熏蒸性杀线虫剂——氟唑唑嗪、氟砜、氟吡喃和恶胺——对这四种RKN的运动能力、卵孵化和繁殖的影响。体外行为反应分析显示,不同物种之间的运动有显著差异,肠梭菌对所评估的杀线虫剂不太敏感。根结线虫在温室条件下的种群反应表明,所有的杀线虫剂都损害了所评价的根结线虫的繁殖。虽然大多数杀线虫剂对减少卵孵化有较强的作用,但氟唑唑嗪对所有RKN物种的卵孵化抑制作用较差。不同种属对杀线虫剂的卵孵化反应无差异。在这项研究中,我们首次对这些杀线虫剂在这些RKN物种中的运动、繁殖和卵孵化进行了综合评价。本研究提高了我们对非熏蒸性杀线虫剂对不同丝虫病线虫种类特异性反应的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential Response of Meloidogyne enterolobii, M. floridensis, M. haplanaria, and M. incognita to Sublethal Doses of Nonfumigant Nematicides.

Root-knot nematodes (RKNs; Meloidogyne spp.) are among the most widespread and damaging plant-parasitic nematodes known. Although M. incognita is the most prevalent RKN species, other species, including M. enterolobii, M. floridensis, and M. haplanaria, have recently been detected in multiple Georgia, United States, vegetable fields. Producers use chemical nematicides to manage M. incognita populations because most vegetable crops do not have effective RKN host resistance. We evaluated the effects of sublethal doses of nonfumigant nematicides-fluazaindolizine, fluensulfone, fluopyram, and oxamyl-on motility, egg hatching, and reproduction of these four RKN species. In vitro behavioral response assays revealed significant variation in motility between species, with M. enterolobii being the less sensitive to the evaluated nematicides. RKN population response in greenhouse conditions indicated that all the nematicides impaired the reproduction of the evaluated Meloidogyne species. Whereas most nematicides displayed a strong effect on reducing the egg hatching, fluazaindolizine appeared to have a poor effect on suppressing the egg hatching across all RKN species. No differences were observed among Meloidogyne species in their egg-hatching responses to nematicides. In this study, we conducted the first comprehensive evaluation of these nematicides on motility, reproduction, and egg hatching in these RKN species. This study enhances our understanding of the species-specific responses of different Meloidogyne spp. to nonfumigant nematicides.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Phytopathology
Phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
505
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Phytopathology publishes articles on fundamental research that advances understanding of the nature of plant diseases, the agents that cause them, their spread, the losses they cause, and measures that can be used to control them. Phytopathology considers manuscripts covering all aspects of plant diseases including bacteriology, host-parasite biochemistry and cell biology, biological control, disease control and pest management, description of new pathogen species description of new pathogen species, ecology and population biology, epidemiology, disease etiology, host genetics and resistance, mycology, nematology, plant stress and abiotic disorders, postharvest pathology and mycotoxins, and virology. Papers dealing mainly with taxonomy, such as descriptions of new plant pathogen taxa are acceptable if they include plant disease research results such as pathogenicity, host range, etc. Taxonomic papers that focus on classification, identification, and nomenclature below the subspecies level may also be submitted to Phytopathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信