臂丛和周围神经阻滞的实践和多样性:综述。

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Neha Singh, Vrushali Ponde, Balavenkatasubramanian Jagannathan, Gaurav Agarwal, Ritesh Roy, Amit Dixit
{"title":"臂丛和周围神经阻滞的实践和多样性:综述。","authors":"Neha Singh, Vrushali Ponde, Balavenkatasubramanian Jagannathan, Gaurav Agarwal, Ritesh Roy, Amit Dixit","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_97_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Regional anesthesia plays a crucial role in perioperative medicine, influencing both immediate and long-term outcomes. However, there is a lack of data regarding the utilization and practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks. We attempted to investigate the practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks using a validated questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A questionnaire was validated by 14 experts and was distributed online for the response. There were 1020 responses, and the data are expressed as frequencies and percentages. There were 58.2% females and 41.8% males, including 32.3% of the respondents with more than 20 years of experience and 27.5% having 10-20 years of experience. Participants from teaching hospitals, government, and private college comprised 49.7%, while those from the corporates and private practitioners constituted 50.2%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants fell into the age range of 31-40 years, followed by 41-50 years. The regional blocks were performed daily by 21.8%, weekly by 23.8%, every 15 days by 38.4%, and monthly by 16% of the participants. Furthermore, 43.6% of the participants discussed the block plan with the patients. The most common blocks of the upper limb and lower limb were the supraclavicular approach of the brachial plexus block (90.8%) and the fascia iliaca (82.5%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present survey highlights the details about the present practices, advantages, and limiting factors for using plexus and peripheral nerve blocks. This is the first data acquired with a validated survey from a South Asian Country, which can be used to compare changes in future practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"41 2","pages":"270-279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practices and diversities in plexus and peripheral nerve blocks: A survey.\",\"authors\":\"Neha Singh, Vrushali Ponde, Balavenkatasubramanian Jagannathan, Gaurav Agarwal, Ritesh Roy, Amit Dixit\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joacp.joacp_97_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Regional anesthesia plays a crucial role in perioperative medicine, influencing both immediate and long-term outcomes. However, there is a lack of data regarding the utilization and practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks. We attempted to investigate the practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks using a validated questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A questionnaire was validated by 14 experts and was distributed online for the response. There were 1020 responses, and the data are expressed as frequencies and percentages. There were 58.2% females and 41.8% males, including 32.3% of the respondents with more than 20 years of experience and 27.5% having 10-20 years of experience. Participants from teaching hospitals, government, and private college comprised 49.7%, while those from the corporates and private practitioners constituted 50.2%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants fell into the age range of 31-40 years, followed by 41-50 years. The regional blocks were performed daily by 21.8%, weekly by 23.8%, every 15 days by 38.4%, and monthly by 16% of the participants. Furthermore, 43.6% of the participants discussed the block plan with the patients. The most common blocks of the upper limb and lower limb were the supraclavicular approach of the brachial plexus block (90.8%) and the fascia iliaca (82.5%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present survey highlights the details about the present practices, advantages, and limiting factors for using plexus and peripheral nerve blocks. This is the first data acquired with a validated survey from a South Asian Country, which can be used to compare changes in future practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"270-279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_97_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_97_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:区域麻醉在围手术期医学中起着至关重要的作用,影响着近期和远期的预后。然而,缺乏关于臂丛和周围神经阻滞的应用和实践的数据。我们试图用一份有效的问卷调查臂丛和周围神经阻滞的做法。材料与方法:由14位专家对问卷进行验证,并在网上发放问卷。共有1020个回复,数据以频率和百分比表示。女性占58.2%,男性占41.8%,其中20年以上从业经验的占32.3%,10-20年从业经验的占27.5%。来自教学医院、政府和私立大学的受访者占49.7%,而来自企业和私人医生的受访者占50.2%。结果:参与者年龄以31 ~ 40岁居多,其次为41 ~ 50岁。21.8%的参与者每天、23.8%的参与者每周、38.4%的参与者每15天进行一次、16%的参与者每月进行一次。此外,43.6%的参与者与患者讨论了阻断计划。上肢和下肢最常见的阻滞分别为锁骨上入路臂丛阻滞(90.8%)和髂筋膜阻滞(82.5%)。结论:本调查重点介绍了目前使用丛神经和周围神经阻滞的做法、优点和限制因素。这是通过南亚国家的有效调查获得的第一个数据,可用于比较未来实践的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practices and diversities in plexus and peripheral nerve blocks: A survey.

Background and aims: Regional anesthesia plays a crucial role in perioperative medicine, influencing both immediate and long-term outcomes. However, there is a lack of data regarding the utilization and practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks. We attempted to investigate the practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks using a validated questionnaire.

Material and methods: A questionnaire was validated by 14 experts and was distributed online for the response. There were 1020 responses, and the data are expressed as frequencies and percentages. There were 58.2% females and 41.8% males, including 32.3% of the respondents with more than 20 years of experience and 27.5% having 10-20 years of experience. Participants from teaching hospitals, government, and private college comprised 49.7%, while those from the corporates and private practitioners constituted 50.2%.

Results: Most participants fell into the age range of 31-40 years, followed by 41-50 years. The regional blocks were performed daily by 21.8%, weekly by 23.8%, every 15 days by 38.4%, and monthly by 16% of the participants. Furthermore, 43.6% of the participants discussed the block plan with the patients. The most common blocks of the upper limb and lower limb were the supraclavicular approach of the brachial plexus block (90.8%) and the fascia iliaca (82.5%), respectively.

Conclusions: The present survey highlights the details about the present practices, advantages, and limiting factors for using plexus and peripheral nerve blocks. This is the first data acquired with a validated survey from a South Asian Country, which can be used to compare changes in future practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信