Neha Singh, Vrushali Ponde, Balavenkatasubramanian Jagannathan, Gaurav Agarwal, Ritesh Roy, Amit Dixit
{"title":"臂丛和周围神经阻滞的实践和多样性:综述。","authors":"Neha Singh, Vrushali Ponde, Balavenkatasubramanian Jagannathan, Gaurav Agarwal, Ritesh Roy, Amit Dixit","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_97_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Regional anesthesia plays a crucial role in perioperative medicine, influencing both immediate and long-term outcomes. However, there is a lack of data regarding the utilization and practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks. We attempted to investigate the practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks using a validated questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A questionnaire was validated by 14 experts and was distributed online for the response. There were 1020 responses, and the data are expressed as frequencies and percentages. There were 58.2% females and 41.8% males, including 32.3% of the respondents with more than 20 years of experience and 27.5% having 10-20 years of experience. Participants from teaching hospitals, government, and private college comprised 49.7%, while those from the corporates and private practitioners constituted 50.2%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants fell into the age range of 31-40 years, followed by 41-50 years. The regional blocks were performed daily by 21.8%, weekly by 23.8%, every 15 days by 38.4%, and monthly by 16% of the participants. Furthermore, 43.6% of the participants discussed the block plan with the patients. The most common blocks of the upper limb and lower limb were the supraclavicular approach of the brachial plexus block (90.8%) and the fascia iliaca (82.5%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present survey highlights the details about the present practices, advantages, and limiting factors for using plexus and peripheral nerve blocks. This is the first data acquired with a validated survey from a South Asian Country, which can be used to compare changes in future practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"41 2","pages":"270-279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practices and diversities in plexus and peripheral nerve blocks: A survey.\",\"authors\":\"Neha Singh, Vrushali Ponde, Balavenkatasubramanian Jagannathan, Gaurav Agarwal, Ritesh Roy, Amit Dixit\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joacp.joacp_97_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Regional anesthesia plays a crucial role in perioperative medicine, influencing both immediate and long-term outcomes. However, there is a lack of data regarding the utilization and practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks. We attempted to investigate the practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks using a validated questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A questionnaire was validated by 14 experts and was distributed online for the response. There were 1020 responses, and the data are expressed as frequencies and percentages. There were 58.2% females and 41.8% males, including 32.3% of the respondents with more than 20 years of experience and 27.5% having 10-20 years of experience. Participants from teaching hospitals, government, and private college comprised 49.7%, while those from the corporates and private practitioners constituted 50.2%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants fell into the age range of 31-40 years, followed by 41-50 years. The regional blocks were performed daily by 21.8%, weekly by 23.8%, every 15 days by 38.4%, and monthly by 16% of the participants. Furthermore, 43.6% of the participants discussed the block plan with the patients. The most common blocks of the upper limb and lower limb were the supraclavicular approach of the brachial plexus block (90.8%) and the fascia iliaca (82.5%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present survey highlights the details about the present practices, advantages, and limiting factors for using plexus and peripheral nerve blocks. This is the first data acquired with a validated survey from a South Asian Country, which can be used to compare changes in future practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"270-279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_97_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_97_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Practices and diversities in plexus and peripheral nerve blocks: A survey.
Background and aims: Regional anesthesia plays a crucial role in perioperative medicine, influencing both immediate and long-term outcomes. However, there is a lack of data regarding the utilization and practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks. We attempted to investigate the practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks using a validated questionnaire.
Material and methods: A questionnaire was validated by 14 experts and was distributed online for the response. There were 1020 responses, and the data are expressed as frequencies and percentages. There were 58.2% females and 41.8% males, including 32.3% of the respondents with more than 20 years of experience and 27.5% having 10-20 years of experience. Participants from teaching hospitals, government, and private college comprised 49.7%, while those from the corporates and private practitioners constituted 50.2%.
Results: Most participants fell into the age range of 31-40 years, followed by 41-50 years. The regional blocks were performed daily by 21.8%, weekly by 23.8%, every 15 days by 38.4%, and monthly by 16% of the participants. Furthermore, 43.6% of the participants discussed the block plan with the patients. The most common blocks of the upper limb and lower limb were the supraclavicular approach of the brachial plexus block (90.8%) and the fascia iliaca (82.5%), respectively.
Conclusions: The present survey highlights the details about the present practices, advantages, and limiting factors for using plexus and peripheral nerve blocks. This is the first data acquired with a validated survey from a South Asian Country, which can be used to compare changes in future practices.
期刊介绍:
The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.