脑脊液炎症细胞因子作为阿尔茨海默病谱系认知能力下降的预后指标。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Elham Ghanbarian, Babak Khorsand, Kellen K Petersen, Bhargav T Nallapu, S Ahmad Sajjadi, Richard B Lipton, Ali Ezzati
{"title":"脑脊液炎症细胞因子作为阿尔茨海默病谱系认知能力下降的预后指标。","authors":"Elham Ghanbarian, Babak Khorsand, Kellen K Petersen, Bhargav T Nallapu, S Ahmad Sajjadi, Richard B Lipton, Ali Ezzati","doi":"10.1177/13872877251335915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundNeuroinflammation actively contributes to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, the value of neuroinflammatory biomarkers for disease-staging or predicting disease progression remains unclear.ObjectiveTo investigate diagnostic and prognostic utility of inflammatory biomarkers in combination with conventional AD biomarkers.MethodsData from 258 participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of amyloid-β (Aβ), tau, and inflammation were analyzed. Clinically meaningful cognitive decline (CMCD) was defined as a ≥ 4-point increase on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscore 11. Predictor variables included demographics (D: age, sex, education), <i>APOE4</i> status (A), inflammatory biomarkers (I), and classic AD biomarkers of Aβ and p-tau181 (C). Models incorporating inflammatory biomarkers assessed their contribution to improving baseline diagnostic classification and 1-year CMCD prediction.ResultsAt 1-year follow-up, 27.1% of participants experienced CMCD. Adding inflammatory biomarkers to models with D and A variables (DA model) improved classification of cognitively normal (CN) versus mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and CN versus Dementia (<i>p </i>< 0.001). Similarly, inflammatory markers enhanced classification in models including C (DAC model), for CN versus MCI (<i>p </i>< 0.01) and CN versus Dementia (<i>p </i>< 0.001). Predictive performance for CMCD was improved in individuals with MCI and dementia in both models (all <i>p </i>< 0.05). In addition, the DAI model outperformed the DAC model in predicting CMCD for MCI and Dementia groups (both <i>p </i>< 0.05).ConclusionsAddition of CSF inflammatory biomarkers to biomarkers of AD improves diagnostic accuracy of clinical disease stage at baseline and add incremental value to AD biomarkers for prediction of cognitive decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251335915"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory cytokines as prognostic indicators for cognitive decline across Alzheimer's disease spectrum.\",\"authors\":\"Elham Ghanbarian, Babak Khorsand, Kellen K Petersen, Bhargav T Nallapu, S Ahmad Sajjadi, Richard B Lipton, Ali Ezzati\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877251335915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundNeuroinflammation actively contributes to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, the value of neuroinflammatory biomarkers for disease-staging or predicting disease progression remains unclear.ObjectiveTo investigate diagnostic and prognostic utility of inflammatory biomarkers in combination with conventional AD biomarkers.MethodsData from 258 participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of amyloid-β (Aβ), tau, and inflammation were analyzed. Clinically meaningful cognitive decline (CMCD) was defined as a ≥ 4-point increase on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscore 11. Predictor variables included demographics (D: age, sex, education), <i>APOE4</i> status (A), inflammatory biomarkers (I), and classic AD biomarkers of Aβ and p-tau181 (C). Models incorporating inflammatory biomarkers assessed their contribution to improving baseline diagnostic classification and 1-year CMCD prediction.ResultsAt 1-year follow-up, 27.1% of participants experienced CMCD. Adding inflammatory biomarkers to models with D and A variables (DA model) improved classification of cognitively normal (CN) versus mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and CN versus Dementia (<i>p </i>< 0.001). Similarly, inflammatory markers enhanced classification in models including C (DAC model), for CN versus MCI (<i>p </i>< 0.01) and CN versus Dementia (<i>p </i>< 0.001). Predictive performance for CMCD was improved in individuals with MCI and dementia in both models (all <i>p </i>< 0.05). In addition, the DAI model outperformed the DAC model in predicting CMCD for MCI and Dementia groups (both <i>p </i>< 0.05).ConclusionsAddition of CSF inflammatory biomarkers to biomarkers of AD improves diagnostic accuracy of clinical disease stage at baseline and add incremental value to AD biomarkers for prediction of cognitive decline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13872877251335915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251335915\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251335915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经炎症积极参与阿尔茨海默病(AD)的病理生理;然而,神经炎症生物标志物对疾病分期或预测疾病进展的价值仍不清楚。目的探讨炎症生物标志物与传统阿尔茨海默病生物标志物联合应用的诊断和预后价值。方法对258名阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)参与者的数据进行分析,这些参与者的脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物为淀粉样蛋白-β (Aβ)、tau和炎症。临床上有意义的认知衰退(CMCD)被定义为阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分值11增加≥4分。预测变量包括人口统计学(D:年龄、性别、教育程度)、APOE4状态(A)、炎症生物标志物(I)和AD经典生物标志物Aβ和p-tau181 (C)。纳入炎症生物标志物的模型评估了它们对改善基线诊断分类和1年CMCD预测的贡献。结果在1年随访中,27.1%的参与者经历了慢性阻塞性肺病。在具有D和A变量的模型(DA模型)中添加炎症生物标志物可改善认知正常(CN)与轻度认知障碍(MCI)以及CN与痴呆(p p p p p)的分类
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory cytokines as prognostic indicators for cognitive decline across Alzheimer's disease spectrum.

BackgroundNeuroinflammation actively contributes to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, the value of neuroinflammatory biomarkers for disease-staging or predicting disease progression remains unclear.ObjectiveTo investigate diagnostic and prognostic utility of inflammatory biomarkers in combination with conventional AD biomarkers.MethodsData from 258 participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of amyloid-β (Aβ), tau, and inflammation were analyzed. Clinically meaningful cognitive decline (CMCD) was defined as a ≥ 4-point increase on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscore 11. Predictor variables included demographics (D: age, sex, education), APOE4 status (A), inflammatory biomarkers (I), and classic AD biomarkers of Aβ and p-tau181 (C). Models incorporating inflammatory biomarkers assessed their contribution to improving baseline diagnostic classification and 1-year CMCD prediction.ResultsAt 1-year follow-up, 27.1% of participants experienced CMCD. Adding inflammatory biomarkers to models with D and A variables (DA model) improved classification of cognitively normal (CN) versus mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and CN versus Dementia (p < 0.001). Similarly, inflammatory markers enhanced classification in models including C (DAC model), for CN versus MCI (p < 0.01) and CN versus Dementia (p < 0.001). Predictive performance for CMCD was improved in individuals with MCI and dementia in both models (all p < 0.05). In addition, the DAI model outperformed the DAC model in predicting CMCD for MCI and Dementia groups (both p < 0.05).ConclusionsAddition of CSF inflammatory biomarkers to biomarkers of AD improves diagnostic accuracy of clinical disease stage at baseline and add incremental value to AD biomarkers for prediction of cognitive decline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信