中国视频平台与性保健:对早泄内容的评估。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY
Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2025-03-30 Epub Date: 2025-03-26 DOI:10.21037/tau-2025-104
Hao-Yang Lu, Rong-Hao Zhang, Xi Wen, Yi Wang, Ke-Qiu Wu, Zhong-Lai Li, Du Geon Moon, Wei-Fan Jiang
{"title":"中国视频平台与性保健:对早泄内容的评估。","authors":"Hao-Yang Lu, Rong-Hao Zhang, Xi Wen, Yi Wang, Ke-Qiu Wu, Zhong-Lai Li, Du Geon Moon, Wei-Fan Jiang","doi":"10.21037/tau-2025-104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Premature ejaculation (PE) is among the most commonly reported types of sexual dysfunction both globally and in China. Despite the growing popularity of online healthcare services and the greater availability of information in mainland China, there is a pressing need to assess the quality and reliability of PE-related content available online and address the potential impact of online misinformation. Thus, in this study, we assessed the quality of information regarding PE videos on the top video websites in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The top 10 video platforms in mainland China were searched using PE-related keywords for videos published as of July 2023. All available videos were examined for eligibility and reliability, and two reviewers independently evaluated the videos using Global Quality Score (GQS) scores for quality and DISCERN tools for their content reliability. All data were analyzed with SPSS software (IBM Corp.).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information on sexual medicine content related to PE was found to be available on just seven of the websites examined. From the 1,468 videos initially retrieved, 582 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 319 videos (54.81%) were deemed reliable, while 263 (45.19%) were classified as unreliable. The agreement between the two urologists reviewing the videos and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were deemed acceptable. There were significant differences in the quality, reliability, source, presentation format, and themes of the videos.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quality of resources on Chinese video platforms varies widely. Users seeking PE-related information should carefully select the appropriate platforms and opt for higher-quality videos. The existing participation of professional medical personnel was seen as insufficient, and joint efforts are needed to implement content review and the establishment of an evaluation framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"14 3","pages":"729-739"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Video platforms and sexual healthcare in China: assessment of content on premature ejaculation.\",\"authors\":\"Hao-Yang Lu, Rong-Hao Zhang, Xi Wen, Yi Wang, Ke-Qiu Wu, Zhong-Lai Li, Du Geon Moon, Wei-Fan Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tau-2025-104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Premature ejaculation (PE) is among the most commonly reported types of sexual dysfunction both globally and in China. Despite the growing popularity of online healthcare services and the greater availability of information in mainland China, there is a pressing need to assess the quality and reliability of PE-related content available online and address the potential impact of online misinformation. Thus, in this study, we assessed the quality of information regarding PE videos on the top video websites in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The top 10 video platforms in mainland China were searched using PE-related keywords for videos published as of July 2023. All available videos were examined for eligibility and reliability, and two reviewers independently evaluated the videos using Global Quality Score (GQS) scores for quality and DISCERN tools for their content reliability. All data were analyzed with SPSS software (IBM Corp.).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information on sexual medicine content related to PE was found to be available on just seven of the websites examined. From the 1,468 videos initially retrieved, 582 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 319 videos (54.81%) were deemed reliable, while 263 (45.19%) were classified as unreliable. The agreement between the two urologists reviewing the videos and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were deemed acceptable. There were significant differences in the quality, reliability, source, presentation format, and themes of the videos.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quality of resources on Chinese video platforms varies widely. Users seeking PE-related information should carefully select the appropriate platforms and opt for higher-quality videos. The existing participation of professional medical personnel was seen as insufficient, and joint efforts are needed to implement content review and the establishment of an evaluation framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"729-739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986497/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2025-104\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2025-104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早泄是全球和中国最常见的性功能障碍之一。尽管在线医疗服务在中国大陆越来越受欢迎,信息的可用性也越来越高,但迫切需要评估在线医疗相关内容的质量和可靠性,并解决在线错误信息的潜在影响。因此,在本研究中,我们评估了中国顶级视频网站上关于体育视频的信息质量。方法:使用pe相关关键词对截至2023年7月发布的中国大陆前10大视频平台进行搜索。对所有可用视频的合格性和可靠性进行了检查,两位评论者使用全球质量评分(GQS)对视频的质量进行了独立评估,并使用DISCERN工具对视频的内容可靠性进行了评估。所有数据均采用SPSS软件(IBM Corp.)进行分析。结果:在调查的网站中,只有7个网站提供了与PE相关的性医学内容信息。在最初检索的1468个视频中,582个符合纳入标准。其中,319个视频(54.81%)被认为是可靠的,263个(45.19%)被认为是不可靠的。两名泌尿科医生审查录像和组内相关系数(ICC)的一致意见被认为是可以接受的。在视频的质量、可靠性、来源、呈现格式和主题方面存在显著差异。结论:中国视频平台资源质量参差不齐。寻求体育相关信息的用户应仔细选择合适的平台,并选择高质量的视频。专业医务人员的现有参与被认为是不够的,需要共同努力实施内容审查和建立评价框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Video platforms and sexual healthcare in China: assessment of content on premature ejaculation.

Background: Premature ejaculation (PE) is among the most commonly reported types of sexual dysfunction both globally and in China. Despite the growing popularity of online healthcare services and the greater availability of information in mainland China, there is a pressing need to assess the quality and reliability of PE-related content available online and address the potential impact of online misinformation. Thus, in this study, we assessed the quality of information regarding PE videos on the top video websites in China.

Methods: The top 10 video platforms in mainland China were searched using PE-related keywords for videos published as of July 2023. All available videos were examined for eligibility and reliability, and two reviewers independently evaluated the videos using Global Quality Score (GQS) scores for quality and DISCERN tools for their content reliability. All data were analyzed with SPSS software (IBM Corp.).

Results: Information on sexual medicine content related to PE was found to be available on just seven of the websites examined. From the 1,468 videos initially retrieved, 582 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 319 videos (54.81%) were deemed reliable, while 263 (45.19%) were classified as unreliable. The agreement between the two urologists reviewing the videos and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were deemed acceptable. There were significant differences in the quality, reliability, source, presentation format, and themes of the videos.

Conclusions: The quality of resources on Chinese video platforms varies widely. Users seeking PE-related information should carefully select the appropriate platforms and opt for higher-quality videos. The existing participation of professional medical personnel was seen as insufficient, and joint efforts are needed to implement content review and the establishment of an evaluation framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信