用谷歌搜索证据:多少才够?一个中心的经验。

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Isomi M Miake-Lye, Selene Mak, Meron M Begashaw, Paul G Shekelle
{"title":"用谷歌搜索证据:多少才够?一个中心的经验。","authors":"Isomi M Miake-Lye, Selene Mak, Meron M Begashaw, Paul G Shekelle","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02836-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rise of powerful search engines (e.g., Google) make the searching for gray literature more feasible within the time and resources of a typical systematic review. However, there are no hypothesis-testing studies to guide us on how to conduct such a search. It is our belief that the \"best practices\" for incorporating Google searches might come from the collection of experiential evidence that users have had, from which can be drawn some tentative conclusions. It is our intention with this communication to relay our experience with Google searches for five projects and the lessons we think we have learned. We invite our systematic review colleagues to contribute their own experiences and thus to build up the experiential evidence about when and how to use Google as a search engine to supplement traditional computerized database searches.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"92"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Google to search for evidence: how much is enough? One center's experience.\",\"authors\":\"Isomi M Miake-Lye, Selene Mak, Meron M Begashaw, Paul G Shekelle\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-025-02836-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The rise of powerful search engines (e.g., Google) make the searching for gray literature more feasible within the time and resources of a typical systematic review. However, there are no hypothesis-testing studies to guide us on how to conduct such a search. It is our belief that the \\\"best practices\\\" for incorporating Google searches might come from the collection of experiential evidence that users have had, from which can be drawn some tentative conclusions. It is our intention with this communication to relay our experience with Google searches for five projects and the lessons we think we have learned. We invite our systematic review colleagues to contribute their own experiences and thus to build up the experiential evidence about when and how to use Google as a search engine to supplement traditional computerized database searches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016424/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02836-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02836-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强大的搜索引擎(例如b谷歌)的兴起使得在典型的系统综述的时间和资源范围内搜索灰色文献变得更加可行。然而,没有假设检验研究来指导我们如何进行这样的搜索。我们相信,整合谷歌搜索的“最佳实践”可能来自用户拥有的经验证据的收集,从中可以得出一些初步的结论。我们的目的是传达我们在谷歌搜索五个项目的经验和我们认为我们已经吸取的教训。我们邀请我们的系统评价同事提供他们自己的经验,从而建立关于何时以及如何使用谷歌作为搜索引擎来补充传统计算机数据库搜索的经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Google to search for evidence: how much is enough? One center's experience.

The rise of powerful search engines (e.g., Google) make the searching for gray literature more feasible within the time and resources of a typical systematic review. However, there are no hypothesis-testing studies to guide us on how to conduct such a search. It is our belief that the "best practices" for incorporating Google searches might come from the collection of experiential evidence that users have had, from which can be drawn some tentative conclusions. It is our intention with this communication to relay our experience with Google searches for five projects and the lessons we think we have learned. We invite our systematic review colleagues to contribute their own experiences and thus to build up the experiential evidence about when and how to use Google as a search engine to supplement traditional computerized database searches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信