5-HT3受体拮抗剂预防妇科手术后恶心和呕吐:系统综述和网络荟萃分析

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hongxia Xu, Lingyan Rong, Shaohui Yang, Jiankun Xing, Huajun Dong, Huihui Liu, Xiaotao Chen, Lingyan Liu
{"title":"5-HT3受体拮抗剂预防妇科手术后恶心和呕吐:系统综述和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Hongxia Xu, Lingyan Rong, Shaohui Yang, Jiankun Xing, Huajun Dong, Huihui Liu, Xiaotao Chen, Lingyan Liu","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gynecological surgery is generally associated with a high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), for which a combination of antiemetic therapies is advised, but adherence to these protocols is often low. Given the current reality, a preferred 5-HT<sub>3</sub> receptor antagonist for preventing PONV as a result of gynecological operations might be desirable. However, the efficiency of different 5-HT<sub>3</sub> receptor antagonists in gynecological operations was not clear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of different 5-HT<sub>3</sub> antagonists in preventing PONV after gynecological surgery.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from their inception up to September 20, 2023.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Patients who received only 5-HT<sub>3</sub> antagonists to prevent nausea and vomiting following gynecologic surgical procedures were included. Only RCT articles and English language literature were included.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two investigators independently assessed the study quality and performed data extraction. R software and STATA 17 were used for this network meta-analysis to compare treatments using a frequentist approach.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Palonosetron demonstrated superior efficacy compared with ondansetron, with a significant difference in \"acute nausea,\" \"overall nausea,\" \"acute vomiting,\" \"late vomiting,\" \"late PONV,\" \"overall PONV,\" \"late rescue medicine\" and \">24 h rescue medicine.\" There was a significant difference between palonosetron and ramosetron in \"acute nausea,\" between ramosetron and ondansetron in \">24 h nausea,\" and between granisetron and ondansetron in \"late vomiting.\" Additionally, granisetron and palonosetron are generally ranked higher in the P-score system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In gynecological surgery, palonosetron demonstrated superior efficacy to ondansetron. Granisetron seemed to be the most effective alternative to palonosetron in our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"5-HT<sub>3</sub> receptor antagonists for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecological surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hongxia Xu, Lingyan Rong, Shaohui Yang, Jiankun Xing, Huajun Dong, Huihui Liu, Xiaotao Chen, Lingyan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.70197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gynecological surgery is generally associated with a high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), for which a combination of antiemetic therapies is advised, but adherence to these protocols is often low. Given the current reality, a preferred 5-HT<sub>3</sub> receptor antagonist for preventing PONV as a result of gynecological operations might be desirable. However, the efficiency of different 5-HT<sub>3</sub> receptor antagonists in gynecological operations was not clear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of different 5-HT<sub>3</sub> antagonists in preventing PONV after gynecological surgery.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from their inception up to September 20, 2023.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Patients who received only 5-HT<sub>3</sub> antagonists to prevent nausea and vomiting following gynecologic surgical procedures were included. Only RCT articles and English language literature were included.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two investigators independently assessed the study quality and performed data extraction. R software and STATA 17 were used for this network meta-analysis to compare treatments using a frequentist approach.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Palonosetron demonstrated superior efficacy compared with ondansetron, with a significant difference in \\\"acute nausea,\\\" \\\"overall nausea,\\\" \\\"acute vomiting,\\\" \\\"late vomiting,\\\" \\\"late PONV,\\\" \\\"overall PONV,\\\" \\\"late rescue medicine\\\" and \\\">24 h rescue medicine.\\\" There was a significant difference between palonosetron and ramosetron in \\\"acute nausea,\\\" between ramosetron and ondansetron in \\\">24 h nausea,\\\" and between granisetron and ondansetron in \\\"late vomiting.\\\" Additionally, granisetron and palonosetron are generally ranked higher in the P-score system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In gynecological surgery, palonosetron demonstrated superior efficacy to ondansetron. Granisetron seemed to be the most effective alternative to palonosetron in our study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70197\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妇科手术通常与术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)的高风险相关,因此建议联合止吐治疗,但这些方案的依从性通常较低。鉴于目前的现实,优选5-HT3受体拮抗剂来预防妇科手术引起的PONV可能是可取的。然而,不同的5-HT3受体拮抗剂在妇科手术中的疗效尚不清楚。目的:评价不同5-HT3拮抗剂预防妇科术后PONV的疗效。检索策略:检索随机临床试验(rct)的电子数据库,包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science,检索时间从rct开始到2023年9月20日。选择标准:包括仅接受5-HT3拮抗剂预防妇科手术后恶心和呕吐的患者。仅纳入随机对照试验文章和英语文献。数据收集和分析:两名研究者独立评估研究质量并进行数据提取。使用R软件和STATA 17进行网络荟萃分析,比较使用频率分析方法的治疗。主要结果:帕洛诺司琼疗效优于昂丹司琼,在“急性恶心”、“全面恶心”、“急性呕吐”、“晚期呕吐”、“晚期PONV”、“全面PONV”、“晚期抢救用药”和“>24 h抢救用药”方面均有显著差异。帕洛诺司琼和雷莫司琼在“急性恶心”方面有显著差异,雷莫司琼和昂丹司琼在“24小时恶心”方面有显著差异,格拉司琼和昂丹司琼在“晚期呕吐”方面有显著差异。此外,格拉司琼和帕洛诺司琼在p评分系统中的排名通常较高。结论:在妇科手术中,帕洛诺司琼的疗效优于昂丹司琼。在我们的研究中,格拉司琼似乎是帕洛诺司琼最有效的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
5-HT3 receptor antagonists for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecological surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: Gynecological surgery is generally associated with a high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), for which a combination of antiemetic therapies is advised, but adherence to these protocols is often low. Given the current reality, a preferred 5-HT3 receptor antagonist for preventing PONV as a result of gynecological operations might be desirable. However, the efficiency of different 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in gynecological operations was not clear.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of different 5-HT3 antagonists in preventing PONV after gynecological surgery.

Search strategy: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from their inception up to September 20, 2023.

Selection criteria: Patients who received only 5-HT3 antagonists to prevent nausea and vomiting following gynecologic surgical procedures were included. Only RCT articles and English language literature were included.

Data collection and analysis: Two investigators independently assessed the study quality and performed data extraction. R software and STATA 17 were used for this network meta-analysis to compare treatments using a frequentist approach.

Main results: Palonosetron demonstrated superior efficacy compared with ondansetron, with a significant difference in "acute nausea," "overall nausea," "acute vomiting," "late vomiting," "late PONV," "overall PONV," "late rescue medicine" and ">24 h rescue medicine." There was a significant difference between palonosetron and ramosetron in "acute nausea," between ramosetron and ondansetron in ">24 h nausea," and between granisetron and ondansetron in "late vomiting." Additionally, granisetron and palonosetron are generally ranked higher in the P-score system.

Conclusions: In gynecological surgery, palonosetron demonstrated superior efficacy to ondansetron. Granisetron seemed to be the most effective alternative to palonosetron in our study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信