{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣植入术中冠状动脉解剖困难的处理:关键问题是什么?","authors":"Takayuki Onishi, Gilbert H L Tang","doi":"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Predicting and preventing coronary obstruction in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is crucial due to its high mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>In native TAVR, predicting coronary obstruction requires assessing aortic cusp height, coronary artery height, valve-to-coronary distance, and leaflet calcium volume. The VIVID classification has been proposed for evaluating the risk of coronary obstruction in TAVR for failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. After TAVR with the Sapien 3 valve, the feasibility of redo TAVR and coronary access decreases with a shallower implantation of the initial Sapien 3. In redo TAVR of Sapien 3 within an Evolut valve, positioning the Sapien 3 outflow at node 4 improves redo TAVR feasibility and coronary accessibility compared to positioning at nodes 5 or 6. For valve sizing in redo TAVR with Sapien 3, in-vivo CT sizing results in smaller valve sizes than bench sizing, reducing coronary risk and improving redo TAVR feasibility. Leaflet modification and coronary stenting techniques and a dedicated leaflet-splitting device have been proposed to maintain coronary perfusion in high-risk cases.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Coronary preservation in high-risk TAVR remains a significant challenge, requiring further research into preprocedural planning and leaflet modification strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55197,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"367-374"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of difficult coronary anatomy during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: what are the key issues?\",\"authors\":\"Takayuki Onishi, Gilbert H L Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Predicting and preventing coronary obstruction in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is crucial due to its high mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>In native TAVR, predicting coronary obstruction requires assessing aortic cusp height, coronary artery height, valve-to-coronary distance, and leaflet calcium volume. The VIVID classification has been proposed for evaluating the risk of coronary obstruction in TAVR for failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. After TAVR with the Sapien 3 valve, the feasibility of redo TAVR and coronary access decreases with a shallower implantation of the initial Sapien 3. In redo TAVR of Sapien 3 within an Evolut valve, positioning the Sapien 3 outflow at node 4 improves redo TAVR feasibility and coronary accessibility compared to positioning at nodes 5 or 6. For valve sizing in redo TAVR with Sapien 3, in-vivo CT sizing results in smaller valve sizes than bench sizing, reducing coronary risk and improving redo TAVR feasibility. Leaflet modification and coronary stenting techniques and a dedicated leaflet-splitting device have been proposed to maintain coronary perfusion in high-risk cases.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Coronary preservation in high-risk TAVR remains a significant challenge, requiring further research into preprocedural planning and leaflet modification strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"367-374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001229\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management of difficult coronary anatomy during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: what are the key issues?
Purpose of review: Predicting and preventing coronary obstruction in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is crucial due to its high mortality risk.
Recent findings: In native TAVR, predicting coronary obstruction requires assessing aortic cusp height, coronary artery height, valve-to-coronary distance, and leaflet calcium volume. The VIVID classification has been proposed for evaluating the risk of coronary obstruction in TAVR for failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. After TAVR with the Sapien 3 valve, the feasibility of redo TAVR and coronary access decreases with a shallower implantation of the initial Sapien 3. In redo TAVR of Sapien 3 within an Evolut valve, positioning the Sapien 3 outflow at node 4 improves redo TAVR feasibility and coronary accessibility compared to positioning at nodes 5 or 6. For valve sizing in redo TAVR with Sapien 3, in-vivo CT sizing results in smaller valve sizes than bench sizing, reducing coronary risk and improving redo TAVR feasibility. Leaflet modification and coronary stenting techniques and a dedicated leaflet-splitting device have been proposed to maintain coronary perfusion in high-risk cases.
Summary: Coronary preservation in high-risk TAVR remains a significant challenge, requiring further research into preprocedural planning and leaflet modification strategies.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Cardiology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fourteen disciplines published across the year – including arrhythmias, molecular genetics, HDL cholesterol and clinical trials – every issue also contains annotated reference detailing the merits of the most important papers.