口腔颌面外科中男性和女性住院治疗结果的半个世纪回顾:一份单一机构的报告。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Susan Keefe, Carrie Baldwin, Elda Fisher, Timothy A Turvey
{"title":"口腔颌面外科中男性和女性住院治疗结果的半个世纪回顾:一份单一机构的报告。","authors":"Susan Keefe, Carrie Baldwin, Elda Fisher, Timothy A Turvey","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited comprehensive historical data exist comparing male and female residents in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) residency programs. This gap underscores the need to examine sex-based differences to guide equitable policies and practices.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to measure and compare historical enrollment and graduation records between male and female residents within a single OMS residency program.</p><p><strong>Study design, setting, sample: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the University of North Carolina OMS graduation records from 1972 to 2023. The sample was composed of all trainees admitted to the program. All residents still in training, however, were not included in the analyses of postgraduate accomplishments.</p><p><strong>Independent variable: </strong>The independent variable was sex, categorized as male or female.</p><p><strong>Outcome variables: </strong>The outcome variables were attrition and training accomplishments. We documented medical degree, board certification, postgraduate training, and postgraduate employment for each graduate.</p><p><strong>Covariates: </strong>There was no covariate in the study.</p><p><strong>Analyses: </strong>Fisher's exact and χ<sup>2</sup> tests were used, with a significance threshold of P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample was composed of 148 admitted residents. Women comprised 19.6% (29) of total enrollees. Over time, the proportion of females admitted to the program increased from 0.8% (1/12) to 50% (8/16), P = .002. Among the 115 graduates, 13% (15/115) were women. The attrition rates for male and female residents prior to 2000 were 12% (8/65) and 50% (3/6), respectively (P = .04). However, no statistically significant difference was observed after 2000, (P = .5). postgraduate training (P = .42), postgraduate employment settings (P = .42), board certification status (P = .58), and completion of a medical degree (P = .18) did not differ significantly by sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>The University of North Carolina OMS program has seen an increased female representation since its program inception. While female trainees in the past had higher attrition rates, current data no longer support this. Postgraduation outcomes, including postgraduate training, medical degree, board certification, and entry into academic practice-are comparable between male and female graduates. A broader national analysis is recommended to determine if these findings are consistent across other programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Half-Century Review of Male and Female Resident Outcomes in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Single-Institution Report.\",\"authors\":\"Susan Keefe, Carrie Baldwin, Elda Fisher, Timothy A Turvey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joms.2025.03.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited comprehensive historical data exist comparing male and female residents in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) residency programs. This gap underscores the need to examine sex-based differences to guide equitable policies and practices.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to measure and compare historical enrollment and graduation records between male and female residents within a single OMS residency program.</p><p><strong>Study design, setting, sample: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the University of North Carolina OMS graduation records from 1972 to 2023. The sample was composed of all trainees admitted to the program. All residents still in training, however, were not included in the analyses of postgraduate accomplishments.</p><p><strong>Independent variable: </strong>The independent variable was sex, categorized as male or female.</p><p><strong>Outcome variables: </strong>The outcome variables were attrition and training accomplishments. We documented medical degree, board certification, postgraduate training, and postgraduate employment for each graduate.</p><p><strong>Covariates: </strong>There was no covariate in the study.</p><p><strong>Analyses: </strong>Fisher's exact and χ<sup>2</sup> tests were used, with a significance threshold of P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample was composed of 148 admitted residents. Women comprised 19.6% (29) of total enrollees. Over time, the proportion of females admitted to the program increased from 0.8% (1/12) to 50% (8/16), P = .002. Among the 115 graduates, 13% (15/115) were women. The attrition rates for male and female residents prior to 2000 were 12% (8/65) and 50% (3/6), respectively (P = .04). However, no statistically significant difference was observed after 2000, (P = .5). postgraduate training (P = .42), postgraduate employment settings (P = .42), board certification status (P = .58), and completion of a medical degree (P = .18) did not differ significantly by sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>The University of North Carolina OMS program has seen an increased female representation since its program inception. While female trainees in the past had higher attrition rates, current data no longer support this. Postgraduation outcomes, including postgraduate training, medical degree, board certification, and entry into academic practice-are comparable between male and female graduates. A broader national analysis is recommended to determine if these findings are consistent across other programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2025.03.011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2025.03.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:比较口腔颌面外科(OMS)住院医师项目中男性和女性住院医师的综合历史数据有限。这一差距强调有必要审查基于性别的差异,以指导公平的政策和做法。目的:本研究的目的是衡量和比较单一OMS住院医师计划中男性和女性住院医师的入学和毕业记录。研究设计、环境、样本:采用1972年至2023年北卡罗来纳大学OMS毕业记录进行回顾性队列研究。样本由所有被录取的学员组成。然而,所有仍在接受培训的住院医生都没有被纳入研究生成绩的分析。自变量:自变量为性别,分为男性和女性。结果变量:结果变量是减员和训练成绩。我们记录了每个毕业生的医学学位、委员会认证、研究生培训和研究生就业情况。协变量:本研究无协变量。分析:采用Fisher精确检验和χ2检验,显著性阈值为P。结果:样本由148名住院居民组成。女性占总入组者的19.6%(29)。随着时间的推移,该项目录取的女性比例从0.8%(1/12)增加到50% (8/16),P = 0.002。在115名毕业生中,13%(15/115)是女性。2000年以前男性居民流失率为12%(8/65),女性居民流失率为50% (3/6)(P = 0.04)。但2000年以后无统计学差异(P = 0.5)。研究生培训(P = .42)、研究生就业环境(P = .42)、委员会认证状态(P = .58)和完成医学学位(P = .18)在性别上没有显著差异。结论和相关性:北卡罗来纳大学OMS项目自项目开始以来,女性代表人数有所增加。虽然过去女性学员的流失率较高,但目前的数据不再支持这一点。毕业后的成果,包括研究生培训、医学学位、委员会认证和进入学术实践,在男性和女性毕业生之间是相当的。建议进行更广泛的全国分析,以确定这些发现是否与其他项目一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Half-Century Review of Male and Female Resident Outcomes in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Single-Institution Report.

Background: Limited comprehensive historical data exist comparing male and female residents in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) residency programs. This gap underscores the need to examine sex-based differences to guide equitable policies and practices.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to measure and compare historical enrollment and graduation records between male and female residents within a single OMS residency program.

Study design, setting, sample: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the University of North Carolina OMS graduation records from 1972 to 2023. The sample was composed of all trainees admitted to the program. All residents still in training, however, were not included in the analyses of postgraduate accomplishments.

Independent variable: The independent variable was sex, categorized as male or female.

Outcome variables: The outcome variables were attrition and training accomplishments. We documented medical degree, board certification, postgraduate training, and postgraduate employment for each graduate.

Covariates: There was no covariate in the study.

Analyses: Fisher's exact and χ2 tests were used, with a significance threshold of P < .05.

Results: The sample was composed of 148 admitted residents. Women comprised 19.6% (29) of total enrollees. Over time, the proportion of females admitted to the program increased from 0.8% (1/12) to 50% (8/16), P = .002. Among the 115 graduates, 13% (15/115) were women. The attrition rates for male and female residents prior to 2000 were 12% (8/65) and 50% (3/6), respectively (P = .04). However, no statistically significant difference was observed after 2000, (P = .5). postgraduate training (P = .42), postgraduate employment settings (P = .42), board certification status (P = .58), and completion of a medical degree (P = .18) did not differ significantly by sex.

Conclusion and relevance: The University of North Carolina OMS program has seen an increased female representation since its program inception. While female trainees in the past had higher attrition rates, current data no longer support this. Postgraduation outcomes, including postgraduate training, medical degree, board certification, and entry into academic practice-are comparable between male and female graduates. A broader national analysis is recommended to determine if these findings are consistent across other programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: This monthly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments and diagnostic equipment and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信