挽救肺SBRT可能是肺叶切除术后的一种治疗选择。

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5603/rpor.104385
Geovanne Pedro Mauro, Maria Luiza Alves José Ferioli Pereira, Mauricio José de Oliveira Costa, Heloisa A Carvalho
{"title":"挽救肺SBRT可能是肺叶切除术后的一种治疗选择。","authors":"Geovanne Pedro Mauro, Maria Luiza Alves José Ferioli Pereira, Mauricio José de Oliveira Costa, Heloisa A Carvalho","doi":"10.5603/rpor.104385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study intends to analyze the feasibility and the outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a salvage treatment for lung cancer after primary surgery and compare them with the results of SBRT as the first treatment option.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with SBRT, either as a primary treatment or as salvage treatment after primary surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 2017 to January 2022, 68 patients were analyzed. 80% were 65 years-old or above. Seven (10%) underwent SBRT as a salvage treatment after primary surgery. Most lesions treated with primary SBRT were peripheral (n = 33; 54.1%), opposed to the salvage group, where 71.4% were central lesions (n = 5). Patients who had previous surgery presented with lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (p = 0.006). Median time between surgery and salvage SBRT was 35.4 months. Median follow-up was 29.3 months; median overall survival (OS) at 2 years and 3 years was, respectively, 73.5% and 67.6% (median 52.5 months), with no difference between groups. Median local, regional, and distant progression free survivals were not reached. Local control was 94.1% at 2 years and 92.6% at 3 years. Only 5 (8.2%) patients presented late grade 3-4 pneumonitis, and one, grade 5 (fatal), all in the primary SBRT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SBRT as salvage after primary surgery is feasible and seems to be safe. Outcomes are expected to be equivalent to those of the patients submitted to primary SBRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":47283,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","volume":"30 1","pages":"27-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salvage lung SBRT may be a curative option after lobectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Geovanne Pedro Mauro, Maria Luiza Alves José Ferioli Pereira, Mauricio José de Oliveira Costa, Heloisa A Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/rpor.104385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study intends to analyze the feasibility and the outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a salvage treatment for lung cancer after primary surgery and compare them with the results of SBRT as the first treatment option.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with SBRT, either as a primary treatment or as salvage treatment after primary surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 2017 to January 2022, 68 patients were analyzed. 80% were 65 years-old or above. Seven (10%) underwent SBRT as a salvage treatment after primary surgery. Most lesions treated with primary SBRT were peripheral (n = 33; 54.1%), opposed to the salvage group, where 71.4% were central lesions (n = 5). Patients who had previous surgery presented with lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (p = 0.006). Median time between surgery and salvage SBRT was 35.4 months. Median follow-up was 29.3 months; median overall survival (OS) at 2 years and 3 years was, respectively, 73.5% and 67.6% (median 52.5 months), with no difference between groups. Median local, regional, and distant progression free survivals were not reached. Local control was 94.1% at 2 years and 92.6% at 3 years. Only 5 (8.2%) patients presented late grade 3-4 pneumonitis, and one, grade 5 (fatal), all in the primary SBRT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SBRT as salvage after primary surgery is feasible and seems to be safe. Outcomes are expected to be equivalent to those of the patients submitted to primary SBRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"27-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999021/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.104385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.104385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在分析立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)作为原发性肺癌术后救助性治疗的可行性和疗效,并与SBRT作为首选治疗方案的结果进行比较。材料与方法:回顾性分析早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的SBRT治疗,无论是作为初级治疗还是作为初级手术后的救助治疗。结果:2017年1月至2022年1月,共分析68例患者。80%的人年龄在65岁或以上。7例(10%)在初次手术后接受SBRT作为挽救性治疗。原发性SBRT治疗的大多数病变为外周病变(n = 33;54.1%),而挽救组,71.4%为中心病变(n = 5)。既往手术患者1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)较低(p = 0.006)。从手术到挽救性SBRT的中位时间为35.4个月。中位随访时间为29.3个月;2年和3年的中位总生存期(OS)分别为73.5%和67.6%(中位52.5个月),组间无差异。未达到局部、区域和远处无进展生存的中位数。2年和3年局部控制率分别为94.1%和92.6%。只有5例(8.2%)患者出现晚期3-4级肺炎,1例出现5级(致命)肺炎,均为原发性SBRT组。结论:SBRT作为原发性手术后的抢救是可行且安全的。预期结果与接受原发性SBRT的患者相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Salvage lung SBRT may be a curative option after lobectomy.

Background: This study intends to analyze the feasibility and the outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a salvage treatment for lung cancer after primary surgery and compare them with the results of SBRT as the first treatment option.

Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with SBRT, either as a primary treatment or as salvage treatment after primary surgery.

Results: From January 2017 to January 2022, 68 patients were analyzed. 80% were 65 years-old or above. Seven (10%) underwent SBRT as a salvage treatment after primary surgery. Most lesions treated with primary SBRT were peripheral (n = 33; 54.1%), opposed to the salvage group, where 71.4% were central lesions (n = 5). Patients who had previous surgery presented with lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (p = 0.006). Median time between surgery and salvage SBRT was 35.4 months. Median follow-up was 29.3 months; median overall survival (OS) at 2 years and 3 years was, respectively, 73.5% and 67.6% (median 52.5 months), with no difference between groups. Median local, regional, and distant progression free survivals were not reached. Local control was 94.1% at 2 years and 92.6% at 3 years. Only 5 (8.2%) patients presented late grade 3-4 pneumonitis, and one, grade 5 (fatal), all in the primary SBRT group.

Conclusion: SBRT as salvage after primary surgery is feasible and seems to be safe. Outcomes are expected to be equivalent to those of the patients submitted to primary SBRT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is an interdisciplinary bimonthly journal, publishing original contributions in clinical oncology and radiotherapy, as well as in radiotherapy physics, techniques and radiotherapy equipment. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is a journal of the Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, the Czech Society of Radiation Oncology, the Hungarian Society for Radiation Oncology, the Slovenian Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Polish Study Group of Head and Neck Cancer, the Guild of Bulgarian Radiotherapists and the Greater Poland Cancer Centre, affiliated with the Spanish Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and the Portuguese Society of Radiotherapy - Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信